Jump to content

Recommended Posts

This whole thread is a diversion from a serious matter of great importance to East Dulwich.


Katie1997 has hinted at it, and I will now write as much as I dare.


[1] Several years ago someone wrote on the East Dulwich Forum about an underground river that runs underneath Barry Road from The Plough to Peckham Rye Common.


[2] Only a few days ago someone wrote in that other place about an underground river near Stuart Road.


[3] Southwark Council has not explained why it keeps the sluice gates in Peckham Rye Park locked, or the interesting timetable and reasons for their temporary openings.


John K

Katie97 I hope it's ok for me to comment: "Let's hear what, er, UDT has to say, eh, 'New' Nexus?",


Don't you think there are others hurling personal insults?


Don't you think it's strange you only perceive insults when it's someone who has different views to you.


"As it happens, I don't understand the financial crisis much and rather than joining a specific forum for finance professionals (eg experts), I thought that I'd join the East Dulwich Forum in the hope that someone whose knowledge I could trust would join up thus enlightening me in all manner of financial crisis matters (and the collapse of civilisation as we know it)".



Please tell me is the "collapse of civilisation as we know it", bracketed because you feel the people who

are enlightening you have covered the changes you believe will come?

edhistory Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> This whole thread is a diversion from a serious

> matter of great importance to East Dulwich.

>

> Katie1997 has hinted at it, and I will now write

> as much as I dare.

>

> [1] Several years ago someone wrote on the East

> Dulwich Forum about an underground river that runs

> underneath Barry Road from The Plough to Peckham

> Rye Common.

>

> [2] Only a few days ago someone wrote in that

> other place about an underground river near Stuart

> Road.

>

> [3] Southwark Council has not explained why it

> keeps the sluice gates in Peckham Rye Park locked,

> or the interesting timetable and reasons for their

> temporary openings.

>

> John K


John K, I'm afraid you misunderstand my post, I wasn't 'hinting' at anything of the sort. I have no idea about what you refer to above, nor are any of my posts on this thread related to it. The Nessie thing (if that's what you're thinking of) was meant to be light-hearted and jovial and no ulterior meaning whatsoever.

TE44 Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Katie97 I hope it's ok for me to comment: "Let's

> hear what, er, UDT has to say, eh, 'New' Nexus?",

>

> Don't you think there are others hurling personal

> insults?

>

> Don't you think it's strange you only perceive

> insults when it's someone who has different views

> to you.


TE44 - no, I don't think its strange as the reason I 'perceived' an insult was due to the following from udt "I doubt katie etc has the mental capacity to understand ...blah, blah etc'. So that's definitely not a case of me 'perceiving' an insult. That WAS a personal insult, irrespective of whether I agree with udt or not.


Now did I ever say that others weren't hurling personal insults? But its interesting that you didn't pick up on the unprovoked personal insult towards others on this thread (perhaps than those whose views you possibly agree with?)


> "As it happens, I don't understand the financial

> crisis much and rather than joining a specific

> forum for finance professionals (eg experts), I

> thought that I'd join the East Dulwich Forum in

> the hope that someone whose knowledge I could

> trust would join up thus enlightening me in all

> manner of financial crisis matters (and the

> collapse of civilisation as we know it)".

>

>

> Please tell me is the "collapse of civilisation as

> we know it", bracketed because you feel the

> people who

> are enlightening you have covered the changes you

> believe will come?


No. Short but hopefully succinct answer for you as I'm in the middle of cooking Sunday lunch.

Ok, Hugo, I said that I'd get some links that show past, known disgusting behaviour by the US government to show why it is reasonable not to trust them.


Here are two to be getting on with:


US deliberately giving syphilis to asylum patients in the name of science.


And on their own citizens this also.

And tragic and a crime against humanity. Slightly different scale wouldn't you say? Unless you're claiming that this was also a precursor to destroying the planet and putting in place the New World Order?


Sorry, no, of course you wouldn't say. ;-)

http://www.whale.to/b/bay_of_tonkin_incident.html


http://911review.com/articles/anon/false_flag_perations.html


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation_Northwoods


1966 U.S. Army dispenses Bacillus subtilis variant niger throughout the New York City subway system. More than a million civilians are exposed when army scientists drop lightbulbs filled with the bacteria onto ventilation grates.


968 CIA experiments with the possibility of poisoning drinking water by injecting chemicals into the water supply of the FDA in Washington, D.C.


1990 More than 1500 six-month old black and hispanic babies in Los Angeles are given an "experimental" measles vaccine that had never been licensed for use in the United States. CDC later admits that parents were never informed that the vaccine being injected to their children was experimental.


This is not a bash at Americans,

Americans have lost control of America

Katie97 I found your post "Let's hear what, er, UDT has to say, eh, 'New' Nexus?" insulting, as far as I can


remember your postings have in a funny juvenile way been based around paranoia. I don't mind a laugh, but I


feel your above posts are a pisstake, when someone wants to give there understanding of your wit, you can't


hear it. But nice to see you appreciate the nessie post.



edited (typing mistake)

No New Nexus, that's just a great example of where you are misrepresenting the facts to generate fear and panic.


Neither of the first two tests were of harmful bacteria, and it's necessary to investigate to the possible effects of the release of harmful bacteria in this way. The final one is just an attack on a rather shameful clinical test, not quite on the scale of the syphilis experiment.


Do you recognize that the essence of your complaint is that the US government did not give the public the full picture, when you deliberately attempt to disguise the full picture from the readers of this forum?


I'm interested if you plan to apologize for the children that died in the UK after the outrageous MMA scare distributed by conspiracy theorists scared mothers into failing to vaccinate their children?


No, I thought not.


You talk about America having lost control (as if it's now), and then cite two examples almost half a century ago and one two decades ago.


Must try harder.

Huguenot Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> No New Nexus, that's just a great example of where

> you are misrepresenting the facts to generate fear

> and panic.

>

> Neither of the first two tests were of harmful

> bacteria, and it's necessary to investigate to the

> possible effects of the release of harmful

> bacteria in this way. The final one is just an

> attack on a rather shameful clinical test, not

> quite on the scale of the syphilis experiment.

>

> Do you recognize that the essence of your

> complaint is that the US government did not give

> the public the full picture, when you deliberately

> attempt to disguise the full picture from the

> readers of this forum?

>

> I'm interested if you plan to apologize for the

> children that died in the UK after the outrageous

> MMA scare distributed by conspiracy theorists

> scared mothers into failing to vaccinate their

> children?

>

> No, I thought not.

>

> You talk about America having lost control (as if

> it's now), and then cite two examples almost half

> a century ago and one two decades ago.

>

> Must try harder.


I do not remember posting about MMA, maybe you could expand on this accusation or is this one of your, guilt by association - that you are so readily happy to thro at people.

TE44 Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Katie97 I found your post "Let's hear what, er,

> UDT has to say, eh, 'New' Nexus?" insulting, as

> far as I can


TE44 - fair enough if you found that post of mine insulting, however, it was in response to Nexus' remarks. I don't think anyone takes kindly to unprovoked, personal insults such as the one referring to whether I have the mental capacity to understand something or not.


> remember your postings have in a funny juvenile

> way been based around paranoia. I don't mind a

> laugh, but I

>

> feel your above posts are a pisstake, when someone

> wants to give there understanding of your wit, you

> can't

>

> hear it. But nice to see you appreciate the nessie

> post.

>

> edited (typing mistake)


Oh, I do hear it. Loud and clear. And by the way, whilst I appreciate you are entitled to your opinion, I find your remarks insulting too.

Sorry, MMR, not MMA. Typo


The usual scare story circulated by bullshitters looking for attention. In this case claiming that the MMR vaccine caused autism and it was only being distributed to save the government money.


Dead kids and permanent disfigurements created by the conspiracy theory shitheads.

Huguenot Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Sorry, MMR, not MMA. Typo

>

> The usual scare story circulated by bullshitters

> looking for attention. In this case claiming that

> the MMR vaccine caused autism and it was only

> being distributed to save the government money.

>

> Dead kids and permanent disfigurements created by

> the conspiracy theory shitheads.


OK, MMR where did I post about this?


Potty mouth.

I'm sorry LD, but none of these are on a par with claiming that the government killed 3,000 of its own citizens to bag some cash and hide some documents.


And let's not forget that 911 is being used as an example to prove that there is a New World Order out there determine to bankrupt the world and starve and enslave the citizens.


Rendition - nothing to do with it at all. That's the intelligence services in a time of war.


Not saying it's not bad - just saying it has nothing to do with the premise of this thread.

I'm just putting up blatant cases of disgusting behaviour by our governments which they have lied about.


I'm not really into the New World Order thing, because I don't think they are smart enough to control everything to that extent, but I would be surprised if they didn't have long term plans on how to best protect their interests to the detriment of all us little folk.


If that involved killing a few thousand people to introduce draconian laws then I don't think they'd be too worried, after all the loss of life in Afghanistan and Iraq is not something they are overly concerned about. However, I am not sure the evidence that happened is clear. It's hard to make sense of what actually happened because there is a lot of contradictory 'evidence' about. So I'm staying neutral on that until something more substantial turns up.

Well, let's be clear, there is no evidence at all that it was a conspiracy. There is enormous amounts of evidence that it wasn't.


If you're still sitting On the fence it's because you want to, not because there's a problem with the evidence.


That's like me saying I'm on the fence about Jupiter being made by mice out of playdoh.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Post much better this Xmas.  Sue posted about whether they send Xmas cards; how good the post is,  is relevant.  Think I will continue to stay off Instagram!
    • These have reduced over the years, are "perfect" lives Round Robins being replaced by "perfect" lives Instagram posts where we see all year round how people portray their perfect lives ?    The point of this thread is that for the last few years, due to issues at the mail offices, we had delays to post over Christmas. Not really been flagged as an issue this year but I am still betting on the odd card, posted well before Christmas, arriving late January. 
    • Two subjects here.  Xmas cards,  We receive and send less of them.  One reason is that the cost of postage - although interestingly not as much as I thought say compared to 10 years ago (a little more than inflation).  Fun fact when inflation was double digits in the 70s cost of postage almost doubled in one year.  Postage is not a good indication of general inflation fluctuating a fair bit.  The huge rise in international postage that for a 20g Christmas card to Europe (no longer a 20g price, now have to do up to 100g), or a cheapskate 10g card to the 'States (again have to go up to the 100g price) , both around a quid in 2015, and now has more than doubled in real terms.  Cards exchanged with the US last year were arriving in the New Year.  Funnily enough they came much quicker this year.  So all my cards abroad were by email this year. The other reason we send less cards is that it was once a good opportunity to keep in touch with news.  I still personalise many cards with a news and for some a letter, and am a bit grumpy when I get a single line back,  Or worse a round robin about their perfect lives and families.  But most of us now communicate I expect primarily by WhatApp, email, FB etc.  No need for lightweight airmail envelope and paper in one.    The other subject is the mail as a whole. Privitisation appears to have done it no favours and the opening up of competition with restrictions on competing for parcel post with the new entrants.  Clearly unless you do special delivery there is a good chance that first class will not be delivered in a day as was expected in the past.   Should we have kept a public owned service subsidised by the tax payer?  You could also question how much lead on innovation was lost following the hiving off of the national telecommunications and mail network.
    • Why have I got a feeling there was also a connection with the beehive in Brixton on that road next to the gym
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...