Jump to content

Recommended Posts

*Bob* Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I never knew that about Pearl Harbour!!

>

> Wowzer - all this stuff really makes you think.



US was told 3 days prior to the attack on pearl harbor by Australian secret service that Japan fleet was on it?s way,


If you were US, would you not get your fleet out of harbor?


US did everything it could to provoke Japan.


3 air craft carriers where on maneuvers, that was lucky, keeping your most important assets out of danger.

HAL9000 Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> StraferJack Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > conspiracy theorists

>

> Just to put the record straight: I have only ever

> used this screen name on the EDF.


Same here, I have only used one screen name on the EDF. But for some unknown reason it doesn't stop Straferjack from dishing the dirt at evry opportunity.

Scylla100 Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Check out what Noam Chomsky has to say about 9/11

> conspiracy theories and this man is seriously no

> friend to anybody in authority

>

> edited to say you didn't put any linky linky text

> in there



http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3Fq4teGzhTo


Gore Vidal

Straferjack said on another thread that he'll only listens to people if they hold certain positions as in the case of Tony Blair, former PM. This suggests to me that SJ does not have the analytical skills to determine another person's knowledge or capability other than their position.


Now if SJ & Paco wants to be judges then I suggest they should read the thread and be in the possession of the full facts rather than being spoon fed with information. However, with their inability to gather relevant information then I very much doubt I'll want to take their views seriously.

UDT, throughout this wonderful thread you have become obsessed wirh other people's 'intellect' as you call it... It's wonderfully ironic of you to do so given that you paint yourself as quite a dumb-ass really.


The deluded really are deluded.... >:D<

StraferJack Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> >

> in the wider scheme of things, this is true. In

> the last couple of weeks, not enough people of

> note have said anything like as sensible


In response to:


Undisputedtruth Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> What Tony Blair has said is nothing new.


The above came from the Blair on Moral decline thread in the drawing room.


So yes Straferjack, I believe you've said such words to that effect.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Just a quick note that my son was mugged last night on Dunstans Road just after 6pm. Two youths on bikes with balaclavas stole his phone, headphones and driver’s license near the mansion block next to Dawson’s Heights. Please be vigilant when walking in the area after dark. 
    • They clearly don’t.  I would expect better from the council.  Rather dismally, it sounds like any complaints or requests just fall on deaf ears.
    • No, because they are a business and their job is to make a profit. It is the local council, on our behalf, who should be giving regard to the environment. Gala, not unreasonably, might take the view that it is the council's role to protect the environment of Southwark, and if they have no objection to this scheme then frankly why shouldn't they (Gala) go ahead? And the council also seems to take the view that they are focused on revenue and not the environment. Otherwise they might listen to the environmental pleas here. The mistake you are making is assuming that either party to this transaction (we are clearly only bystanders) gives a flying fig for the environment when there is money in the offing.
    • It struck me last year that any dialogue with Gala themselves e.g. at the box-ticking "Community Engagement Sessions" is completely pointless, as they are just a business trying to do whatever is necessary to hold their event; the park is just a venue to them, a necessary facility, and they'll say anything to secure it. They don't care about it's welfare or upkeep, over and above making sure there's no complaints big enough to prevent them using it again. I've found that discussing issues with them has just led to them using that info to counteract that issue - effectively helping them strengthen their position. What I find frustrating is that the council, despite being the body that decides on this, and should be representing local residents, takes no active part in any discussions or presentations, so there's no way to engage with them apart from an online consultation which is clearly also a box ticking exercise, bearing in mind for the last two years the overwhelming majority (97% of respondents) objected to the event. Why are Gala running the community meetings? Why do Gala run the issue hotline? If the council really care about the park and the surrounding community, and still allow this type of event, they should be way more hands on with taking responsibility for it's running, not just handing it all over to a profit making company.  Sorry, probably tldr but so sad about the repeated negative impact on our (once beautiful & peaceful) park and just exasperated that there's so little that can be done to halt it. This is just the start, it WILL turn into another Brockwell Park, and Gala & the council just don't care.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...