But HN if you say this isn’t about Trump then we can never ever even approach dialogue
the documentary was about Trump, the things he said and did and how those words were edited and acted on
if you want to ignore absolutely everything else and just in a complete vacuum look at an editing decision - that’s on you
I don’t think you are a proactive Trump supporter. But you make yourself one by proxy if you can’t look at this decision in the round. He literally does not care about these rules. Which is why he gets away with so much. If we were talking about him in the past tense then this would be easier - but he is very much an enemy of everything we hold dear, and the bbc isn’t - even allowing for this edit
if I have previously explicitly or otherwise painted you as an actual Trump supporter I apologise and clarify that now. But on this actual issue I don’t think we will ever come close to agreeing
Meanwhile - bbc enemies run their hands and trump carries on with his mission
I would prefer “intolerant of nonsense, outspoken and direct” and I definitely try to avoid “bullying”
Am I above personal insults and name-calling? Hmmm. On balance I think I receive more than I give
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.