Jump to content

Recommended Posts

She clearly was very distressed and vulnerable. Every suicide is a tragedy and the immediate question is always one of whether anything could have been done to help her. Her friends and family especially will wrestle with that for a long time. I suspect that she had been battling with depression for some time, and that the decision to pursue with the assault charge was the final tipping point. It will be a complex mix of things that took her to this very tragic place though. Very sad. She had everything to live for in reality.
  • 3 weeks later...

Apollo astronaut Al Worden has died at the age of 88.


Worden served as command module pilot for Apollo 15 with Dave Scott and Jim Irwin. During the mission Worden became the first human to carry out a deep space walk. He logged 38 minutes in extravehicular activity outside the command module, "Endeavour."


  • 2 weeks later...

KidKruger Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Lord Bath 87 (Corona)


Very Sad..


Back in the 70's Myself and a friend were invited to go to Blenheim Palace to meet Lord Bath.

Cannot remember by who but it was a close family member.

We declined as we did not want to meet some Posh Rich person.

We had no idea about the Man at that time.


Really regretted it later..


DulwichFox

IlonaM Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> All those taken by the virus, some of whom are

> remembered in the Guardian:

>

> https://www.theguardian.com/world/2020/mar/18/not-

> ready-to-go-tributes-paid-to-uk-first-named-victim

> s-of-coronavirus

>

> A truly sobering read.


I agree , very sobering and glad to see you've come around to my way of thinking since foxy poo pooed me on the 2nd April

https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/forum/read.php?20,2107904


😱

Spartacus Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------


> I agree , very sobering and glad to see you've

> come around to my way of thinking since foxy poo

> pooed me on the 2nd April


I don't believe I was ever contrary to your way of thinking Sparticus. Every death is a tragic loss, whether in hospital, at home, in a care home, at home or abroad. It is painfully tragic that those looking after us on the front line are succumbing to the virus because they have not been given correct PPE.

Spartacus' original post of April 10, 09:07PM actually ran:


IlonaM Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> All those taken by the virus, some of whom are

> remembered in the Guardian:

>

> https://www.theguardian.com/world/2020/mar/18/not-

> ready-to-go-tributes-paid-to-uk-first-named-victim

> s-of-coronavirus

>

> A truly sobering read.


I agree , very sobering and glad to see you've come around to my way of thinking since you poo pooed me on the 2nd April https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/forum/read.php?20,2107904

ianr Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Spartacus' original post of April 10, 09:07PM

> actually ran:

>

> IlonaM Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > All those taken by the virus, some of whom are

> > remembered in the Guardian:

> >

> >

> https://www.theguardian.com/world/2020/mar/18/not-

>

> >

> ready-to-go-tributes-paid-to-uk-first-named-victim

>

> > s-of-coronavirus

> >

> > A truly sobering read.

>

> I agree , very sobering and glad to see you've

> come around to my way of thinking since you poo

> pooed me on the 2nd April

> https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/forum/read.php?

> 20,2107904



Actually I quoted the message as it was when I replied this morning. It still reads 'foxy'! Not sure of the point you're making ianr. I did not participate in the thread you are quoting. Let's focus on the point of the thread, shall we?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Per Cllr McAsh, as quoted above: “We are currently updating our Enforcement Policy and changes will allow for the issuing of civil penalties ranging from £175 to £300 for visible smoke emissions, replacing the previous reliance on criminal prosecution. " Is anyone au fait with the Clean Air Act 1993, and  particularly with the state of 'Smoke Control' law and practice generally?  I've just been looking  through some of it for the first time and, AFAICS, the "civil penalties ranging from £175 to £300" were introduced into the Clean Air Act, at Schedule 1A, in May 2022.  So it seems that, in this particular,  it's a matter of the enforcement policy trailing well behind the legislation.  I'm not criticising that at all, but am curious.  
    • Here's the part of march46's linked-to Southwark News article pertaining to Southwark Council. "Southwark Council were also contacted for a response. "Councillor James McAsh, Cabinet Member for Clean Air, Streets & Waste said: “One of Southwark’s key priorities is to create a healthy environment for our residents. “To achieve this we closely monitor legislation and measures that influence air pollution – our entire borough apart from inland waterways is designated as a Smoke Control Area, and we also offer substantial provision for electric vehicles to promote alternative fuel travel options and our Streets for People strategy. “We as a council support the work of Mums for Lungs and recognise the health and environmental impacts of domestic solid fuel burning, particularly from wood-burning appliances. “We are currently updating our Enforcement Policy and changes will allow for the issuing of civil penalties ranging from £175 to £300 for visible smoke emissions, replacing the previous reliance on criminal prosecution.  “This work is being undertaken in collaboration with other London boroughs as part of the pan-London Wood Burning Project, which aims to harmonise enforcement approaches and share best practice across the capital.” ETA: And here's a post I made a few years ago, with tangential relevance.  https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/278140-early-morning-drone-flying/?do=findComment&comment=1493274  
    • The solicitor is also the Executor. Big mistake, but my Aunt was very old, and this was the Covid years and shortly after so impossible to intervene and get a couple of close relatives to do this.  She had no children so this is the nephews and nieces. He is a single practitioner, and most at his age would have long since retired - there is a question over his competence Two letters have already gone essentially complaining - batted off and 'amusingly' one put the blame on us. There are five on our side, all speaking to each other, and ideally would work as a single point of contact.  But he has said that this is not allowed - we've all given approval to act on each others behalf. There are five on her late husband's side, who have not engaged with us despite the suggestion to work as a team, There is one other, who get's the lion's share, the typicical 'friend', but we are long since challenging the will. I would like to put another complaint together that he has not used modern collective communication (I expect that he is incapable) which had seriously delayed the execution of the will.   I know many in their 80s very adept with smart phones so that is not an ageist comment. The house has deteriorated very badly, with cold, damp and a serious leak.  PM me if you want to see the dreadful condition that it is now in. I would also question why if the five of us are happy to work together why all of us need to confirm in writing.             The house was lived in until Feb 23, and has been allowed to get like this.
    • Isn’t a five yearly electricity safety certificate one of the things the landlord must give for a legal tenancy?
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...