Jump to content

Recommended Posts

You're assuming the ad stands for the same thing in 2000AD as it does now but it is set so far into the future (well after the collapse of religion and the arrival of Tharg the Mighty) that it obviously follows the Brianonian calendar and stands for After Derek.

Brian Derek of the retail tailors of Sutton in Ashfield?


Was it dated from conception or birth?


I can understand how that would have the global cultural impact to merit a recalculation of the calendar.


Bespoke is the ultimate expression of personal style as well as a significant part of any wardrobe.

As Hugo says..




So, I think we should have our very own calendar.


I suggest that this year be year zero in our "Keff-ian" calendar.


So 2010 P.K ( previously keef ) was last year & this year 1 A.K ( after keef )



I'm open to suggestions for the names of the week & month.


Monday = MacGabhannday ?


Tuesday = ?


Wednesday =


Nette:-S

You guys were making it up as you went along when pontificating about the calender.


So, here's an extra little piece of bull.


John K


? 9. Deinde, ne in posterum a XII kalendas aprilis aequinoctium recedat, statuimus bissextum quarto quoque anno (uti mos est) continuari debere, praeterquam in centesimis annis; qui, quamvis bissextiles antea semper fuerint, qualem etiam esse volumus annum MDC, post eum tamen qui deinceps consequentur centesimi non omnes bissextiles sint, sed in quadringentis quibusque annis primi quique tres centesimi sine bissexto transigantur, quartus vero quisque centesimus bissextiles sit, ita ut annus MDCC, MDCCC, MDCCCC bissextiles non sint. Anno vero MM, more consueto dies bissextus intercaletur, februario dies XXIX continente, idemque ordo intermittendi intercalandique bissextum diem in quadringentis quibusque annis perpetuo conservetur.

edhistory Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> You guys were making it up as you went along when

> pontificating about the calender.

>

> So, here's an extra little piece of bull.

>

> John K

>

> ? 9. Deinde, ne in posterum a XII kalendas aprilis

> aequinoctium recedat, statuimus bissextum quarto

> quoque anno (uti mos est) continuari debere,

> praeterquam in centesimis annis; qui, quamvis

> bissextiles antea semper fuerint, qualem etiam

> esse volumus annum MDC, post eum tamen qui

> deinceps consequentur centesimi non omnes

> bissextiles sint, sed in quadringentis quibusque

> annis primi quique tres centesimi sine bissexto

> transigantur, quartus vero quisque centesimus

> bissextiles sit, ita ut annus MDCC, MDCCC, MDCCCC

> bissextiles non sint. Anno vero MM, more consueto

> dies bissextus intercaletur, februario dies XXIX

> continente, idemque ordo intermittendi

> intercalandique bissextum diem in quadringentis

> quibusque annis perpetuo conservetur.



Hee hee


You said bissex & annis.


They're rude words


:-$

edhistory Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> You guys were making it up as you went along when

> pontificating about the calender.

>

> So, here's an extra little piece of bull.

>

> John K

>

> ? 9. Deinde, ne in posterum a XII kalendas aprilis aequinoctium recedat, statuimus bissextum quarto

> quoque anno (uti mos est) continuari debere, praeterquam in centesimis annis; qui, quamvis

> bissextiles antea semper fuerint, qualem etiam esse volumus annum MDC, post eum tamen qui

> deinceps consequentur centesimi non omnes bissextiles sint, sed in quadringentis quibusque

> annis primi quique tres centesimi sine bissexto transigantur, quartus vero quisque centesimus

> bissextiles sit, ita ut annus MDCC, MDCCC, MDCCCC bissextiles non sint. Anno vero MM, more consueto

> dies bissextus intercaletur, februario dies XXIX continente, idemque ordo intermittendi

> intercalandique bissextum diem in quadringentis quibusque annis perpetuo conservetur.


But that just explains leap years?


PS Nette - you missed posterum

That was the Gregorian modification John K, and previously referred to as the 'real' start date of the current calendar (as opposed to Anno Domini) in the 16th Century.


Apparently 'bissextiles' is a name for 'leap' year, and I've heard there was something particularly pneumatic about them ;-)

A young schoolchild told me that when they mark their spellings in class they put a tick for correct spellings and a dot for incorrect spellings.


When I said why don't they use a cross (X) for wrong spellings I was told it may hurt people's feelings.


Political Correctness Gone Mad? I bet they wouldn't do this in Free Schools.


Bring back a big fat X in red ink I say.

I think you can probably blame the parents who sue at the drop of a hat, and the legislation that allows them to do it, rather than the school.


It seems a bit illogical, they are both just symbols after all. It doesn't matter whether a dot or a cross means 'wrong', eventually they'll both take on the same associations and emotions.

My own teachers had many variations on marking styles - sometimes using numbers or other symbols. Some used acronyms to communicate varying degrees of incorrectness. No points for guessing what NBG meant. ;-)


Several teachers would not mark incorrect answers at all - just score correct ones.


In Sweden or Finland a tick means wrong. In some Asian countries a 0 means correct.


I don't see why this would be an issue, so long as the kids know what it means.


I could only see this as being 'mad' if you wanted education to churn out an endless line of automatons.

StraferJack Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> which school, silverfox?


I think it would be wrong to name the school. It's the example I was highlighting.


Children need to learn what failure is so they can strive to improve. It also helps them appreciate achievement after effort. This applies in all areas including sport. Too many schools, for example, have adopted contradictory notions of uncompetitive competition. Nobody loses lest it discriminates against or offends others.


This is not preparing children for the real world.

Thinking about this, it's not PCGM, it's just an educational approach.

It's not about offending, it's about not discouraging and alienating.


I'm sure there are proper educationalists out there who could tell me, maybe I'm just making an assumption.


The rights and wrongs of this approach I'm not qualified or experienced to comment on, but surely this is nothing to do with PCGM.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Hello,  I feel as though our apartment is damp. I would like to borrow a dehumidifier to ascertain whether it is or not. Does anyone have a dehumidifier that I could borrow for a week?  thank you,    Brigid
    • Post much better this Xmas.  Sue posted about whether they send Xmas cards; how good the post is,  is relevant.  Think I will continue to stay off Instagram!
    • These have reduced over the years, are "perfect" lives Round Robins being replaced by "perfect" lives Instagram posts where we see all year round how people portray their perfect lives ?    The point of this thread is that for the last few years, due to issues at the mail offices, we had delays to post over Christmas. Not really been flagged as an issue this year but I am still betting on the odd card, posted well before Christmas, arriving late January. 
    • Two subjects here.  Xmas cards,  We receive and send less of them.  One reason is that the cost of postage - although interestingly not as much as I thought say compared to 10 years ago (a little more than inflation).  Fun fact when inflation was double digits in the 70s cost of postage almost doubled in one year.  Postage is not a good indication of general inflation fluctuating a fair bit.  The huge rise in international postage that for a 20g Christmas card to Europe (no longer a 20g price, now have to do up to 100g), or a cheapskate 10g card to the 'States (again have to go up to the 100g price) , both around a quid in 2015, and now has more than doubled in real terms.  Cards exchanged with the US last year were arriving in the New Year.  Funnily enough they came much quicker this year.  So all my cards abroad were by email this year. The other reason we send less cards is that it was once a good opportunity to keep in touch with news.  I still personalise many cards with a news and for some a letter, and am a bit grumpy when I get a single line back,  Or worse a round robin about their perfect lives and families.  But most of us now communicate I expect primarily by WhatApp, email, FB etc.  No need for lightweight airmail envelope and paper in one.    The other subject is the mail as a whole. Privitisation appears to have done it no favours and the opening up of competition with restrictions on competing for parcel post with the new entrants.  Clearly unless you do special delivery there is a good chance that first class will not be delivered in a day as was expected in the past.   Should we have kept a public owned service subsidised by the tax payer?  You could also question how much lead on innovation was lost following the hiving off of the national telecommunications and mail network.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...