Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Hello all,


I've been renting my property out for the past year under a management agreement with an estate agent. It's coming up for renewal as the year is up, but clearly, I don't want to pay the fees again because 1) they've done nothing over the past year to justify it, and 2) I don't need to find someone else to live there as the current resident is perfectly happy. So, how do I go about this? Do I just tell them that I am renting it privately from now on? Do I have to give them any notice to this effect?


Can someone give me some advice please?


Cheers


Sean

As a novice 'accidental landlord', I once had a similar scenario whereby the estate agent had written* into the contract that they would get a repeat fee for every year the original tenants renewed their tenancy agreement. To get round this I simply told the estate agent that the tenants were not going to renew the agreement, and privately drew up a new agreement, cutting out the state agent. Now if I have to use an estate agent I insist on only paying them a 'finder's fee'. Foxton's got into trouble doing something similar, something along the lines of writing into the agreement that if the property was ever sold to the tenants, they would get a cut of the sale price.


*When I say written, the estate agent had infact sneakily given a website link to explain this particular T&C.

It could be argued that not everyone has access to the internet, so therefore it was an unfair contract.

I echo the above in saying read the contract you have with them. The answer to your questions will be in there. There will be a way around most things anyway. Quite normal for a letting agent to expect to continue to collect fees within a reasonable time frame of placing a tenant (stops landlords using them to find a tenant and terminating their services). But having said that, my advice would be never to sign a contract that demands that beyond a resonable time. I think one year is reasonable. More than that, no.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • CPR Dave, attendance records are available on Southwark's website. Maggie Browning has attended 100% of meetings. Jon Hartley has attended 65%.
    • I do hope NOT, wouldn't trust Farage as far as I could throw him, Starmer & co.  He's backed by GB News which focus's predominantly on immigration while the BBC focus predominantly on the Israel - Gazza conflict.   
    • Everyone gets the point that Corbynites try to make with the "total number of votes cast" statistic, it's just a specious one.  In 2017, Corbyn's Labour got fewer votes than May's Tories (both the percentage of votes and aggregate number of votes). In 2019, Corbyn's Labour fewer votes than Johnson's Tories (both the percentage of votes and aggregate number of votes); and he managed to drop 2.7 million votes or 6.9% of vote share between the two elections. I repeat, he got trounced by Boris F***ing Johnson and the Tories after the Brexit omnishambles. It is not true that a "fairer" electoral system would have seen Labour beat the Tories: Labour simply got fewer votes than the Tories. Corbyn lost twice. There is no metric by which he won the general election. His failure to win was a disaster for the UK, and let Johnson and Truss and Sunak into office. Corbynites have to let go of this delusion that Corbyn but really won somehow if you squint in a certain way. It is completely irrelevant that Labour under Corbyn got more votes than Labour under Starmer. It is like saying Hull City was more successful in its 2014 FA Cup Final than Chelsea was in its 2018 FA Cup Final, because Hull scored 2 goals when Chelsea only scored 1. But guess what - Chelsea won its game and Hull City lost. Corbyn's fans turned out to vote for him - but an even larger group of people who found him repellant were motivated enough to show up and vote Tory.
    • I guess its the thing these days to demonstrate an attitude, in this instance seemingly of the negative kind, instead of taking pride in your work and have standards then 🤷‍♀️
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...