Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Hello all,


I've been renting my property out for the past year under a management agreement with an estate agent. It's coming up for renewal as the year is up, but clearly, I don't want to pay the fees again because 1) they've done nothing over the past year to justify it, and 2) I don't need to find someone else to live there as the current resident is perfectly happy. So, how do I go about this? Do I just tell them that I am renting it privately from now on? Do I have to give them any notice to this effect?


Can someone give me some advice please?


Cheers


Sean

As a novice 'accidental landlord', I once had a similar scenario whereby the estate agent had written* into the contract that they would get a repeat fee for every year the original tenants renewed their tenancy agreement. To get round this I simply told the estate agent that the tenants were not going to renew the agreement, and privately drew up a new agreement, cutting out the state agent. Now if I have to use an estate agent I insist on only paying them a 'finder's fee'. Foxton's got into trouble doing something similar, something along the lines of writing into the agreement that if the property was ever sold to the tenants, they would get a cut of the sale price.


*When I say written, the estate agent had infact sneakily given a website link to explain this particular T&C.

It could be argued that not everyone has access to the internet, so therefore it was an unfair contract.

I echo the above in saying read the contract you have with them. The answer to your questions will be in there. There will be a way around most things anyway. Quite normal for a letting agent to expect to continue to collect fees within a reasonable time frame of placing a tenant (stops landlords using them to find a tenant and terminating their services). But having said that, my advice would be never to sign a contract that demands that beyond a resonable time. I think one year is reasonable. More than that, no.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • I wonder how much the rebranding is costing in total?  Could the money be used in a better way ? 
    • It's not fair to hold Corbyn's brother's views against him when he has never explicitly or implicitly endorsed them. And he has enough of his own terrible positions to criticise anyway.
    • Completely unacceptable. They need to fund a proper, permanent park warden presence or this sort of behaviour will get worse. Parks should be safe for all to enjoy and being assaulted and threatened by teenage gangs may put more vulnerable people off using the park altogether. If they are prepared to threaten to hurt an animal then where might it lead? Sorry Alice but we'll have to disagree on this one. This does not sound like kids just being silly; lobbing water bombs at each other is one thing, but targeting complete strangers out for a walk and minding their own business and trying to kick their dog is, in my view, no laughing matter. A group of 15 teenagers can be intimidating, not to everyone but for some it can be, especially if their behaviour is aggressive.  
    • Now I have heard everything…..not send your kid to a school because you don’t like the name - so to get my head around this, if school is outstanding, parents won’t send their child there because of name of school? Or have I not understood?
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...