Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Can anyone help? My late father had a flat which was shared ownership. The Housing Association had a 35 per cent share of it and he owned 65 per cent of it. We are going to sell his flat and we obviously have to repay the 35 per cent which was not his, back to the housing association - my question is, is that 35 per cent based on what the flat was purchased for when he bought it, i.e. around 9 years ago or do we pay back 35 per cent of what it's worth now? Any info greatly appreciated. thanks
Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/19429-shared-ownership-question/
Share on other sites

Surely they own 35% of the flat's current value, otherwise it wouldn't be a 35% stake, it would be a set figure. The point of it being a percentage is that it adjusts with the market, inflation etc.


And you probably wouldn't ask if your 65% was 65% of the value then or now would you? No different the other way around.

Hi


Depends on what kind of shared ownership it is but normally the lease will contain a provision that you notify the housing associaiton of your intention to sell and they have the flat valued by the district valuer. They normally also have a right to nominate a purchaser for the flat within a specific time frame. If they make no nomination or if their nominee fails to proceed with the purchase then you have the right to sell the property on the open market for 65% of the value set by the district valuer and the buyer acquires your 65% share (rather than selling the flat for the full market value and paying back 35% to the Housing Association. You mention that your father paid rent to the housing association so the likelihood is that the above procedure will be correct. There is another way to own a property on shared ownership which is for the housing association to have a charge over the property for their percentage in which case you would sell for the full market value and then repay the housing association their share. Best thing is to contact the Husing Association and they will be able to let you know the correct procedure.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • The current wave of xenophobia is due to powerful/influential people stirring up hatred.  It;'s what happened in the past, think 1930s Germany.  It seems to be even easier now as so many get their information from social media, whether it is right or wrong.  The media seeking so called balance will bring some nutter on, they don't then bring a nutter on to counteract that. They now seem to turn to Reform at the first opportunity. So your life is 'shite', let;s blame someone else.  Whilst sounding a bit like a Tory, taking some ownership/personal responsibility would be a start.  There are some situations where that may be more challenging, in deindustrialised 'left behind' wasteland we can't all get on our bikes and find work.  But I loathe how it is now popular to blame those of us from relatively modest backgrounds, like me, who did see education and knowledge as a way to self improve. Now we are seen by some as smug liberals......  
    • Kwik Fit buggered up an A/C leak diagnosis for me (saying there wasn't one, when there was) and sold a regas. The vehicle had to be taken to an A/C specialist for condensor replacement and a further regas. Not impressed.
    • Yes, these are all good points. I agree with you, that division has led us down dangerous paths in the past. And I deplore any kind of racism (as I think you probably know).  But I feel that a lot of the current wave of xenophobia we're witnessing is actually more about a general malaise and discontent. I know non-white people around here who are surprisingly vocal about immigrants - legal or otherwise. I think this feeling transcends skin colour for a lot of people and isn't as simple as, say, the Jew hatred of the 1930s or the Irish and Black racism that we saw laterally. I think people feel ignored and looked down upon.  What you don't realise, Sephiroth, is that I actually agree with a lot of what you're saying. I just think that looking down on people because of their voting history and opinions is self-defeating. And that's where Labour's getting it wrong and Reform is reaping the rewards.   
    • @Sephiroth you made some interesting points on the economy, on the Lammy thread. Thought it worth broadening the discussion. Reeves (irrespective of her financial competence) clearly was too downbeat on things when Labour came into power. But could there have been more honesty on the liklihood of taxes going up (which they have done, and will do in any case due to the freezing of personal allowances).  It may have been a silly commitment not to do this, but were you damned if you do and damned if you don't?
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...