Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Looking for something a bit different to do this Summer? The new outdoor flying trapeze rig in Ruskin Park is brilliant. It?s suitable for kids age 6+. Adults welcome too so the whole family can get involved! Here?s some pics and a video clip from our lesson at the rig:


https://medium.com/@lorraineliyanage/secrets-of-south-london-tlcc-flying-trapeze-school-in-ruskin-park-a59968c288d0

This looks amazing.

Slightly surprised though to see this in the waiver: "Furthermore, TLCC Trapeze School employees have difficult jobs to perform and cannot prevent all accidents. They try to minimize the risk, but accidents may happen. By signing this agreement, I am waiving any claims against TLCC Trapeze School for negligence and expressly assume the risk of injury because of negligence or failure of equipment."

I understand there would be risks and given it's for kids from age 6 these must be well controlled. But surely users cannot take on responsibility for company's negligence??? Is this even possible under H&S regs?

We've done lots of classes now and it all looks very safe - yet to witness any accidents as everyone wears a harness and is clipped into safety lines at all times. There are three instructors per person. The only safety concern might be that a child forgets to clip themselves in while climbing the ladder and could potentially fall but a parent can stand at the bottom and supervise.

Safety of our students and everyone onsite is our top priority. There are three fully trained instructors for each class looking after a maximum of 10 students. All students wear a safety belt which is attached to safety lines during the activity. Students are also clipped into a safety device when climbing the ladder to the platform.


If you are in the park, please do drop by and we will be more than happy to show you around and take you through the class structure and safety procedures.


Lisa

Director - TLCC Trapeze School

Can you ask someone to waive their rights if you are negligent? That sounds like something that wouldn't hold up in court to me - although I'm no lawyer. I always thought that negligence is one thing you can't get out of. If the well maintained equipment fails for some freak reason, there may be a case. But I would have thought that any accident that was down to negligence on the part of the operator would be clearly their fault and no bit of paper would get them out of it?


That said, it sounds like a well run operation who have simply included the paperwork that those who know about this stuff and advised them, told them was required.

I'll see if I can get some more information about the waiver when I next go there. Waiver aside, it's a very safe activity from what I have observed (my daughter's had lots of lessons at different rigs in London) and a lot of fun for kids and parents.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • I'd quit this thread, let those who just want to slag Labour off have their own thread.  Your views on the economy are worth debating.  I'm just stunned how there wasn't this level of noise with the last government.  I could try to get some dirt on Badenoch but she is pointless  Whilst I am not a fan of the Daily Mirror at least there is some respite from Labour bashing. https://www.mirror.co.uk/news/politics/grenfell-hillsborough-families-make-powerful-36175862 https://www.mirror.co.uk/news/politics/nigel-farage-facing-parliamentary-investigation-36188612  
    • That is a bit cake and eat it tho, isn’t it?    At what point do we stop respecting other people’s opinions and beliefs  because history shows us we sometimes simply have no other choice  you are holding some comfort blanket that allows you to believe we are all equal and all valid and we can simply voice different options - without that ever  impacting on the real world  Were the racists we fought in previous generations different? Were their beliefs patronised by the elites of the time? Or do we learn lessons and avoid mistakes of the past?   racists/bigots having “just as much to say” is both true and yet, a thing we have learnt from the past. The lesson was not “ooh let’s hear them out. They sound interesting and valid and as worthy of an audience as people who hold the opposite opinion” 
    • I don't have a beef with you. But I do have a beef with people who feel that a certain portion of the public's opinion isn't valid.  I don't like racism any more than anyone else here. But I do dislike the idea that an individual's thoughts, beliefs and feelings, no matter how much I may disagree with them, are somehow worth less than my own.  And I get the sense that that is what many disenfranchised voters are feeling - that they are being looked down upon as ignorant, racists who have no right to be in the conversation. And that's what brings out people on the margins and drives them towards extremes, like Reform.  Whether you like it or not, the racist, bigot, anti-european nextdoor to you has just as much say in the country as you do. Intellectual superiority is never going to bring them round. 
    • What is your beef with me ? Why are you asking rhetorical questions?  fighting me but excusing reform? have a look in the mirror  you’ve lost your way 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...