Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I need some advice...


I have a property outside of London which I let out.

We have a Property Management Company and I don't think they are maintaining the property as they should.


I've told them about the roof leaking over a long period of time, but recently it actually collapsed into one of the rooms. After a significant amount of time, it was finally fixed but I now need to repair the room and furnishings which were damaged.


They have said they have no liability as they fixed the roof but I want to claim damages. They said I wouldn't win and to be prepared to cover their legal fees.


It's all in writing...



Thanks

Angelina

as a landlord, you will have insurance - make a claim with your insurer and they will instigate the investigation as to liability.


Also get a lawyer on the case- again, a decent insurance policy should have some access to legal advice as a minimum

well, funnily Sue - I'm trying but it seems that some of the other owners don't understand what's going on (ie what building maintenance means) or they're a bit intimidated.



I'm actually looking for recommendations for a tenacious lawyer who will actually sort it out (rather than a wishy-washy one)..


It might mean the issue extends to the Directors as well (I'm a shareholder, being a FH owner of one flat)

This forum is good for queries


https://www.lemonfool.co.uk/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=11659&sid=8d421b463d27f5b7a1564e7f3cb29f85


.I don't know if they would recommend a suitable lawyer but I'm sure they'd point you in the right direction .


The Property MC sound rather like bullies to me . I assume if you're a shareholder that there's a Residential Management Company .You could look them up on Company House and see what the asccounts are like ,be good to know if there's money at hand to do work .

  • 2 years later...

Victor8ST Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Speak to a good lawyer about this because if you

> have insurance you'll be able to fix everything

> and not spend money from your pocket.


Re Victor8ST: see https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/forum/read.php?30,1960889,2119824#msg-2119824, where he's pushing https://houseandgardencare.com/garden/best-petrol-lawn-mower-guide-for-buyers, ie https://houseandgardencare.com/garden/best-petrol-lawn-mower-guide-for-buyers


The preceding post here will probably be populated in a few days with another website URL he's currently being paid to make look popular and respectable.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • beansprout, what other countries are you familiar with?
    • Counterpoint: there was zero misrepresentation of truth    never mind the bbc or the uk (for now)-  his own country and government impeached him for trying to overturn an election.  What happened was unforgivable. Trump adding a few “non violent”’ legally wise words absolves him of nothing  but back to bbc and uk.  They were correct and now we have Trump threatening to sue for a billion have English people lost all self-respect (that question was answers 9 years ago and is repeated almost daily) 
    • Point is.. top two have quit.. BBC is now what? From being well respected world wide.. not only for news, programs, no idea about pod casts.. Only thing we as a country do well currently is broadcast remembrance service…. Lets face it.. only country that I know of who can release wrong people from jail.. one gave himself up if news is to believed and the other is where? Only country I know of who actually pay people to leave, flights etc and they are back in country .. all heard via Radio 4…  
    • It doesn't matter what channel it was on, how pernicious the subject is and when it happened. Mis-representing the truth in broadcast is not only morally wrong, it's against the OFCOM code of ethics.  Everyone in the industry is trained in how not to do it, most are made to take the BBC's own 'Safeguarding the Trust' course, even if they aren't making BBC programmes.  There wasn't much fuss at the time, because no one knew about it.  "Unless you hate Britain, hate liberals, hate the BBC, want a divided country, support the most powerful person in the world despite his many failings". What the programme makers personally think or feel should never affect how they tell a story; to do so is deeply unprofessional and a sackable offence.  It's the job of the BBC and of all programming to inform viewers of the facts and let them make up their own minds. Even in campaigning documentaries.   
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...