Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I didn't really know where to post this, so thought a thread for things of scientific interest wasn't a bad thing to do.


Anyway, here it is, time lapse footage from the International Space Station above some pretty dramatic aurora



hmm, embeds no longer work. ho hum, you'll have to click through

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/19696-the-lab-for-all-things-sciencey/
Share on other sites

silverfox Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> And...Einstein may be wrong - neutrinos may travel

> faster than light (TBC or to be refuted)


Refuted. Dodgy equipment.



PS mockney what have you done!! This thread will only encourage those who think that reading the 'New Scientist' makes them sound clever. You know who you are.


*sniffs*





;-)

katie1997 Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> PS mockney what have you done!! This thread will

> only encourage those who think that reading the

> 'New Scientist' makes them sound clever. You know

> who you are.

>


At last! Been waiting for this kind ofhttp://t3.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcRUFoGuJK__IC_DexXA8L1sp9DF63idHRiqJsSIHzxB16ne4ytJ thread...


...Hoyvin, glayvin...

katie1997 Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> PS mockney what have you done!! This thread will

> only encourage those who think that reading the

> 'New Scientist' makes them sound clever. You know

> who you are.

>

> *sniffs*

>

>

>

>

> ;-)


Signed Beaker and Dr Bunsen Honeydew B)


*inserts pic of the Muppet's scientists*

This thread will only encourage those who think that reading the 'New Scientist' makes them sound clever


I read New Scientist for stories about bonobos, chimps at a push. I'd estimate 1 in 3 issues carries such awesomeness. Mockers is right, monkey science IS fun.


Sometimes I'm rewarded with other interesting and exciting and fun stuff. Other times it's full of things I can't and have no inclination to understand.


Rather like Heat magazine.


Hurray for science.

John Naughton had an interesting view on this: "Britain is a country in which the word "intellectual" is often preceded by the sneering adjective "so-called", where smart people are put down because they are "too clever by half"


It is a sign of the miserable psychology of modern Britain that people would come on to a thread about the exciting world of science in order to sneer at it.


I read New Scientist because it is inspiring and full of hope, a celebration of the spirit of inquiry and the creativity of our fellow men. Shame on those who would belittle it. ;-)

I think tbf 'intellectual' (complete with sneer) is usually directed at those who study/teach/discuss one or more of English/History/Politics/Sociology/Art... etc.


Surely sciencey types are still boffins.


Boffins are fun - I don't think many people sneer at Stephen Hawking, and I can't see any evidence on this thread of sneering either. A little light-hearted leg-pulling perhaps but no sneering.

Really? I didn't see anyone teasing boffins here, I did see someone mention something about trying to 'sound clever' (implying that they're not clever), which is tantamount to using the phrase 'so-called'. That's what made me recall Naughton's comment.


I'm not cross about it, just resigned to the paucity of enthusiasm for science.


But I'll bow to your better judgment.

Huguenot Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Really? I didn't see anyone teasing boffins here,

> I did see someone mention something about trying

> to 'sound clever' (implying that they're not

> clever), which is tantamount to using the phrase

> 'so-called'. That's what made me recall Naughton's

> comment.


If you mean me Huguenot, feel free to name and shame me. I don't bite...much.


> I'm not cross about it, just resigned to the

> paucity of enthusiasm for science.


Gotta be one of the funniestr things I have read today :))


> But I'll bow to your better judgment.


Just want to quickly thank mockney for this thread, its made my day. I know sometimes I take myself (and the forum) too serioously. Will respond late r once the WHOOSHING has died down on this thread and Iwhen 'm not on the move. Good day for the plane spotters in ED tho (tu)

Hey Hughie, I didn't think it was sneery on Katie's part. Doesn't strike me as her modus operandi, being the sunny wee thing she is and all. I do actually know a few people who read New Scientist to sound clever. Well, when I say New Scientist, I mean their twitter thread.


But I liked what you said about its being "full of hope". It is that. And I am that today. There are good things to be discovered.

But sir? If neutrinos are taking a short cut - isn't that cheating? And if not Sir, then was Dr. Who right after all? And why didn't they try an Operetta Collaboration before embarking on the full Ring Cycle?


Yes Sir.


*trudges sulkily out of lab - after leaving gas taps on*

I've seen that as well Meds. It's intriguing.


I'm guessing that the supply hose must contract as it cools down. However, I'd expect this to happen gradually - but the dribble is all at the same time.


I can think of a couple of things that may create this effect.


The first is that the contraction causes water to gather at a slow rate in the showerhead, but surface tension prevents this leaving through the nozzles. As the gathered water builds, pressure on the nozzles increases thanks to gravity, and eventually this exceeds the breaking strain of the surface tension, allowing water to escape. Because the surface tension of flowing water is lower, it doesn't reseal, and all the gathered water empties out at once.


Or, it may be that the hose passes some temperature threshold which prompts something to 'ping' back into place.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Please rescue. There are plenty of kittens waiting in shelters for a loving home. Try reaching out to https://straycatclub.org.uk/ You can also find an endless list of shelters down below: https://www.catchat.org/index.php/cat-rescue-centres-uk-ireland You should be vetted to ensure you can provide a suitable environment. Unlike breeders, shelters ensure kittens have been spayed/neutered, microchipped & recieve their vaccination.  
    • hellosailor, I feel you on this one. People continue to breathe life into the misconceptions that cats are low-maintenance, natural wanderers or that they can't be prevented from accessing a road - all of which no doubt contributes to these harsh measures. Shelters would do better using their position & platforms to educate rather than applying blanket rules that alienate potential adopters. It does sound like there are inconsistencies in the way Celia Hammond operates. I know of people who have adopted despite not providing a truly suitable environment for their cats. Personally, I was heartbroken to learn that two of the kittens that I had fostered, after being adopted, would later go "missing" on a regular basis. It's a stark reminder that while safety precautions are crucial, overly rigid policies may push well-meaning people toward buying instead of adopting, undermining the very mission of rescue organisations. TWB has taken the initiative to lead by example, teaching clients the importance of mental & physical enrichment, & having policies in place to prevent, for example, the dangers that come with giving cats access to the streets. It has become far too commonplace to see posts regarding cats who have been run over, only for the owners to adopt & repeat the cycle all over again. If shelters could provide insight on why these measures are in place & solutions, these shelters would not only free space within their shelters but educate the public & the overall standards of responsible pet ownership in London. Celia Hammond is a charity most are familiar with, but there are so many others listed within this link; https://www.catchat.org/index.php/cat-rescue-centres-uk-ireland An up & coming charity that is not found in this link, that deserves an honorable mention is https://straycatclub.org.uk/  
    • Looking for a new member of the family.  Will be looking into cat resuce centre's as well before anyone mentions. But my son is in adoration with Kittens and would like to bring one up from a young age. If anyone has any leads, they would be most welcome. 
    • I'm not suggesting that the staff are not good people, it's a fantastic charity to work or volunteer for and what they champion and advocate for is super important. It's great that you had a successful adoption through them and really good to hear that you had a positive experience but I was relaying that anecdotally the many people I know who have tried to rescue a cat from them have been turned down. I myself tried to adopt from them a few years ago and they nixed my application when I said I lived on a road which cars go down. They didn't even do a home visit, that was enough to rule us out. Hopefully things have changed since then to allow more animals to find a loving home. 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...