Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I didn't really know where to post this, so thought a thread for things of scientific interest wasn't a bad thing to do.


Anyway, here it is, time lapse footage from the International Space Station above some pretty dramatic aurora



hmm, embeds no longer work. ho hum, you'll have to click through

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/19696-the-lab-for-all-things-sciencey/
Share on other sites

silverfox Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> And...Einstein may be wrong - neutrinos may travel

> faster than light (TBC or to be refuted)


Refuted. Dodgy equipment.



PS mockney what have you done!! This thread will only encourage those who think that reading the 'New Scientist' makes them sound clever. You know who you are.


*sniffs*





;-)

katie1997 Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> PS mockney what have you done!! This thread will

> only encourage those who think that reading the

> 'New Scientist' makes them sound clever. You know

> who you are.

>


At last! Been waiting for this kind ofhttp://t3.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcRUFoGuJK__IC_DexXA8L1sp9DF63idHRiqJsSIHzxB16ne4ytJ thread...


...Hoyvin, glayvin...

katie1997 Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> PS mockney what have you done!! This thread will

> only encourage those who think that reading the

> 'New Scientist' makes them sound clever. You know

> who you are.

>

> *sniffs*

>

>

>

>

> ;-)


Signed Beaker and Dr Bunsen Honeydew B)


*inserts pic of the Muppet's scientists*

  Quote
This thread will only encourage those who think that reading the 'New Scientist' makes them sound clever


I read New Scientist for stories about bonobos, chimps at a push. I'd estimate 1 in 3 issues carries such awesomeness. Mockers is right, monkey science IS fun.


Sometimes I'm rewarded with other interesting and exciting and fun stuff. Other times it's full of things I can't and have no inclination to understand.


Rather like Heat magazine.


Hurray for science.

John Naughton had an interesting view on this: "Britain is a country in which the word "intellectual" is often preceded by the sneering adjective "so-called", where smart people are put down because they are "too clever by half"


It is a sign of the miserable psychology of modern Britain that people would come on to a thread about the exciting world of science in order to sneer at it.


I read New Scientist because it is inspiring and full of hope, a celebration of the spirit of inquiry and the creativity of our fellow men. Shame on those who would belittle it. ;-)

I think tbf 'intellectual' (complete with sneer) is usually directed at those who study/teach/discuss one or more of English/History/Politics/Sociology/Art... etc.


Surely sciencey types are still boffins.


Boffins are fun - I don't think many people sneer at Stephen Hawking, and I can't see any evidence on this thread of sneering either. A little light-hearted leg-pulling perhaps but no sneering.

Really? I didn't see anyone teasing boffins here, I did see someone mention something about trying to 'sound clever' (implying that they're not clever), which is tantamount to using the phrase 'so-called'. That's what made me recall Naughton's comment.


I'm not cross about it, just resigned to the paucity of enthusiasm for science.


But I'll bow to your better judgment.

Huguenot Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Really? I didn't see anyone teasing boffins here,

> I did see someone mention something about trying

> to 'sound clever' (implying that they're not

> clever), which is tantamount to using the phrase

> 'so-called'. That's what made me recall Naughton's

> comment.


If you mean me Huguenot, feel free to name and shame me. I don't bite...much.


> I'm not cross about it, just resigned to the

> paucity of enthusiasm for science.


Gotta be one of the funniestr things I have read today :))


> But I'll bow to your better judgment.


Just want to quickly thank mockney for this thread, its made my day. I know sometimes I take myself (and the forum) too serioously. Will respond late r once the WHOOSHING has died down on this thread and Iwhen 'm not on the move. Good day for the plane spotters in ED tho (tu)

Hey Hughie, I didn't think it was sneery on Katie's part. Doesn't strike me as her modus operandi, being the sunny wee thing she is and all. I do actually know a few people who read New Scientist to sound clever. Well, when I say New Scientist, I mean their twitter thread.


But I liked what you said about its being "full of hope". It is that. And I am that today. There are good things to be discovered.

But sir? If neutrinos are taking a short cut - isn't that cheating? And if not Sir, then was Dr. Who right after all? And why didn't they try an Operetta Collaboration before embarking on the full Ring Cycle?


Yes Sir.


*trudges sulkily out of lab - after leaving gas taps on*

I've seen that as well Meds. It's intriguing.


I'm guessing that the supply hose must contract as it cools down. However, I'd expect this to happen gradually - but the dribble is all at the same time.


I can think of a couple of things that may create this effect.


The first is that the contraction causes water to gather at a slow rate in the showerhead, but surface tension prevents this leaving through the nozzles. As the gathered water builds, pressure on the nozzles increases thanks to gravity, and eventually this exceeds the breaking strain of the surface tension, allowing water to escape. Because the surface tension of flowing water is lower, it doesn't reseal, and all the gathered water empties out at once.


Or, it may be that the hose passes some temperature threshold which prompts something to 'ping' back into place.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • My understanding is the "free event" is 100% Gala, nothing to do with the council. Obviously Gala will still make money from the food & drink that they are trying to coerce punters into buying on their social media posts. Their costs will be negligible due to already having the infrastructure in place for Gala. So Gala are trying to appear community minded by providing this "free event", but the real goal is to set a precedent for a fourth day's festival - which surely no one could possibly object to?!? - in preparation for applying (again) for two three-day festivals spread over two weekends. It's only another two days, right, and the site & equipment is already there, so why would anyone object?!? More money for the council, much more money for Gala, win-win right? But yet another week of our park taken away from us, too, and another 18,000 people trampling & littering the park, and another week of disturbance for the native birds & wildlife...
    • Meson Don Felipe on The Cut was my go to place for many years. Though it's now many years since I was there. 10-15 minute walk from the Tate. If you go can you tell me what it's like nowadays?
    • Doubt you would have got much change out of £150.00 for battery and certainly having forked out for it, best to use your car. I recently sold  my car via webuyanycar.com - very pleasant experience & was roughly what I was expecting. Pop your bangers reg jnto their website to get an idea of price - they do send e mails once a fortnight/month just as an aid for you. Easy enough to delete - don’t even have to read valuation. They literally buy any car - if you can’t get it to them, they will charge you to get it there or recommend a co that will do it for you. Must say, mine was a 2014 reg and whilst a bit suspicious, paid extra to get money into my account as needed it for next car but was assured funds had I not gone down route I took would be in my account within 5 days. I now live in the country - every time I have been back to Dulwich and surrounding area, normally get a fine for driving at wrong time or parking at  wrong time so if I drive now, park in West or East Dulwich and do everything else by public transport and walking.  Were I still to be living in ED then before I left was pondering this very issue but since I have been back regularly for health reason I no longer drive but take the train and then buses, walk or Uber. Much cheaper than running a car and had I stayed, that would have been the course I would have taken. I don’t go out everyday, have an allotment or job to go to or family so in my case, would be cheaper not to have a car.  Was truely shocked   at the cost of second hand cars…..but where I now live only has a smattering of buses so no choice but to have wheels to get from A to B etc.          
    • If you don't use the car often then suggest disconnect the battery between use by undoing the earth (negative / minus sign) cable from the battery and the battery will then last longer between use. Remember, central locking, alarm, clock, etc won't work with battery disconnected and wit ours I have to lock the doors with central locking before disconnecting battery as only have key on one door (leave bonnet open before locking doors). Hope this helps  
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...