Jump to content

Recommended Posts

The results I have: Harris Girl's, Kingsdale and Charter had 2/3 of their pupils gettting 5 GCSEs including English and Maths, Walworth Academy, a bit higher at 70%. I have requested the results for other schools in the borough from council officers.

Renata

I now have a few more results, these are currently unverified results, ie may change slightly with remarking:


Notre Dame 57%

Sacred Heart 81%

Harris Academy @ Peckham 49%

Harris Academy Bermondsey 64%

Harris Girl's Academy 67%

Walworth Academy 69%

Bacon's 66%

Globe Academy 42%


Renata

  • 3 months later...

Interesting reading the official league tables for Southwark


table for southwark


Well done to Harris Girls, particularly the fantastic value added score.


It looks as if Kingsdale's GCSE score has been revised downwards (Rentata mentions 66% getting 5 gcse including english and maths above but the table says only 45%. Is this the outcome following the investigation last summer? Does anyone know what happened in the end or is the topic still off limits?

The Evening Standard did a two page spread yesterday with results for every London Borough.


It was surprising to see that some schools in Lewisham had the lowest value added score than any other borough in London. Even Aske's had a negative VAM. But Harris Crystal Palace had a better GCSE pass rate that Dulwich College.

BB100 Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> The Evening Standard did a two page spread

> yesterday with results for every London Borough.

>

> It was surprising to see that some schools in

> Lewisham had the lowest value added score than any

> other borough in London. Even Aske's had a

> negative VAM. But Harris Crystal Palace had a

> better GCSE pass rate that Dulwich College.



This shows how quickly these school improve/deteriorate. When we were looking at schools just 4 years ago, Lewisham schools were considered much better than Southwark's and you wouldn't touch Harris Girls with a barge pole.


Goes to show that you need to do your homework and not necessarily go by the reputation of the school.

prickle Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> This shows how quickly these school

> improve/deteriorate. When we were looking at

> schools just 4 years ago, Lewisham schools were

> considered much better than Southwark's and you

> wouldn't touch Harris Girls with a barge pole.


The Lewisham schools with the lowest VAM have always been poor performing but it was interesting to see how the other borough's such as Harringay have left them behind. Lewisham LA seem to be blind to the fact that parents are going for smaller classes and streaming, and any gimmicks such as scholarships in other boroughs and not for 30 mixed ability children in one class. Lewisham has been really aggressive about improving their Primary schools, and it's working, but they do not seem to be making the same progress with the secondarys. I wonder if it's because the most able children in Lewisham are going to school in other boroughs.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Week 11 fixtures...   Saturday 8th November Tottenham Hotspur v Manchester United Everton v Fulham West Ham United v Burnley Sunderland v Arsenal Chelsea v Wolverhampton Wanderers   Sunday 9th November Aston Villa v AFC Bournemouth Brentford v Newcastle United Crystal Palace v Brighton & Hove Albion Nottingham Forest v Leeds United Manchester City v Liverpool
    • Another recommendation for Dulwich Test and Services Centre. Only been using them for a couple of years but wish I’d found them earlier 
    • A new roadmap (surely railmap?!) for rail accessibility has been published: https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/accessible-railways-roadmap It says "approximately 56% of stations and around 66% of the 1.3 billion journeys that take place on the network have step-free access to platforms...  "£373 million has been committed over the next 5 years to deliver Access for All projects, providing step-free access from station entrances to and between platforms, alongside other essential accessibility upgrades. These works, together, will increase the number of step-free stations across Great Britain from 56% to 58%. "This improvement will make travel easier with step-free access available at stations covering an increased share of total rail journeys – from 66% up to 71%" Don't know what that means for us here: upgrading Peckham Rye would cover a lot of rail journeys but the cost has no doubt increased from the £40m figure previously quoted. So that would eat into a lot of the funding.
    • It's not really though, is it. It's practical.  At least we're allowed Christmas lights.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...