Jump to content

Recommended Posts

The results I have: Harris Girl's, Kingsdale and Charter had 2/3 of their pupils gettting 5 GCSEs including English and Maths, Walworth Academy, a bit higher at 70%. I have requested the results for other schools in the borough from council officers.

Renata

I now have a few more results, these are currently unverified results, ie may change slightly with remarking:


Notre Dame 57%

Sacred Heart 81%

Harris Academy @ Peckham 49%

Harris Academy Bermondsey 64%

Harris Girl's Academy 67%

Walworth Academy 69%

Bacon's 66%

Globe Academy 42%


Renata

  • 3 months later...

Interesting reading the official league tables for Southwark


table for southwark


Well done to Harris Girls, particularly the fantastic value added score.


It looks as if Kingsdale's GCSE score has been revised downwards (Rentata mentions 66% getting 5 gcse including english and maths above but the table says only 45%. Is this the outcome following the investigation last summer? Does anyone know what happened in the end or is the topic still off limits?

The Evening Standard did a two page spread yesterday with results for every London Borough.


It was surprising to see that some schools in Lewisham had the lowest value added score than any other borough in London. Even Aske's had a negative VAM. But Harris Crystal Palace had a better GCSE pass rate that Dulwich College.

BB100 Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> The Evening Standard did a two page spread

> yesterday with results for every London Borough.

>

> It was surprising to see that some schools in

> Lewisham had the lowest value added score than any

> other borough in London. Even Aske's had a

> negative VAM. But Harris Crystal Palace had a

> better GCSE pass rate that Dulwich College.



This shows how quickly these school improve/deteriorate. When we were looking at schools just 4 years ago, Lewisham schools were considered much better than Southwark's and you wouldn't touch Harris Girls with a barge pole.


Goes to show that you need to do your homework and not necessarily go by the reputation of the school.

prickle Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> This shows how quickly these school

> improve/deteriorate. When we were looking at

> schools just 4 years ago, Lewisham schools were

> considered much better than Southwark's and you

> wouldn't touch Harris Girls with a barge pole.


The Lewisham schools with the lowest VAM have always been poor performing but it was interesting to see how the other borough's such as Harringay have left them behind. Lewisham LA seem to be blind to the fact that parents are going for smaller classes and streaming, and any gimmicks such as scholarships in other boroughs and not for 30 mixed ability children in one class. Lewisham has been really aggressive about improving their Primary schools, and it's working, but they do not seem to be making the same progress with the secondarys. I wonder if it's because the most able children in Lewisham are going to school in other boroughs.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • I have sympathy with any voter, anyone, who having witnessed the last 14 years and then Labour in the last year and wonders just how can things be this bad  unless a) they voted for brexit b) voted Tory after 2010 c) is thinking of voting reform  because anyone who thinks reform won’t make things a thousand times worse after voting for the previous?  It is they who are the problem.  They are the reason the country is in the doldrums with an embarrassingly-timid Labour government 
    • In what way? Maybe it just felt more intelligent and considered coming directly after Question Time, which was a barely watchable bun fight.
    • Yes, all this. Totally Sephiroth. The electorate wants to see transformation overnight. That's not possible. But what is possible is leading with the right comms strategy, which isn't cutting through. As I've said before, messaging matters more now than policy, that's the only way to bring the electorate with you. And I worry that that's how Reform's going to get into power.  And the media LOVES Reform. 
    • “There was an excellent discussion on Newscast last night between the BBC Political Editor, the director of the IFS and the director of More In Common - all highly intelligent people with no party political agenda ” I would call this “generous”   Labour should never have made that tax promise because, as with - duh - Brexit, it’s pretending the real world doesn’t exist now. I blame Labour in no small part for this delusion. But the electorate need to cop on as well.  They think they can have everything they want without responsibilities, costs or attachments. The media encourage this  Labour do need to raise taxes. The country needs it.  Now, exactly how it’s done remains to be seen. But if people are just going to go around going “la la laffer curve. Liars! String em up! Vote someone else” then they just aren’t serious people reckoning with the problem yes Labour are more than a year into their term, but after 14 years of what the Tories  did? Whoever takes over, has a major problem 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...