Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Now that's a blast from the past!! A Uni day tipple.....was that the beginnings of alcopops? Closely followed by hooch!


I've not seen it in years. Presume the big supermarkets dont sell it.


Are there any old school off licences locally? Thinkvthey would be the most likely stockist.

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/20149-mad-dog-2020/#findComment-492913
Share on other sites

I think Two Dogs and Hooch were both alcoholic lemonade. Can't remember which was first..... Do remember drinking far too much of both!!


Hooch had a cartoon lemon on it originally which the manufacturers were made to change since it was deemed to encourage children to drink it.


20/20 we used to drink whilst getting ready to go out! Don't remember liking it even then!

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/20149-mad-dog-2020/#findComment-492921
Share on other sites

Help-Ma-Boab Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Vodka mixed with Hooch. That brings back some

> blurry mid 90's memories.


Just mid-90s, Help-Ma?


Now what was in a Blastaway? It was Castaway (alcoholic Lilt) and summat else.


And what was the difference between blue and red Thunderbird, *Bob*? I remember neither as tasting of much.

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/20149-mad-dog-2020/#findComment-493023
Share on other sites

*Bob* Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Moos Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> And

> > Thunderbird, for some reason.

>

> Blue or Red, Madam? Shall I pour... ?


I think its usually drunk straight from the bottle.


Which is probably just as well as I don't like to ask what type of glass should, or should not, be used.

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/20149-mad-dog-2020/#findComment-493092
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Andy is an absolute star. Have used him for years and he’s become a hugely trusted and valued friend as well as handyman. Always willing to go the extra mile and doesn’t cut corners, but great on pricing. Can’t recommend enough.
    • Surely you are still covered under these circumstances even if you don't have the physical licence? I can't believe you would be prevented from driving? That would be a ridiculous system. I don't recall any delays   when mine was renewed. Why would their medical department be involved if you have no medical issues? Could someone have made some admin mistake somewhere along the line?
    • Does anyone have the same problem.  I am 79 and have sent my licence renewal form to the DVLA on the 21st October 20 which they have received. I have just received a letter from them them dated 22 December 2025 today saying my licence is with their Drivers Medal Department and will be processed as soon as possible. This follows my telephone call to them after three weeks  from the October date as I had not received my licence back as per their time frame. I also followed this up mid December after finally getting through but did not get any confirmation as to what the situation was. Is this normal practice? On the 7 January 2026 I will be unable to drive as my licence has not been sent back. I have no medical issues and meet all the requirements with no problem as per previous renewals in fact nothing has changed health wise.Their the letter states if they need any more details from me, they will contact me directly. Why has it taken 2 and a half months get get this far? Is this some sort of ploy to get older drivers to finally give up their driving by making life difficult as possible.  Has anyone else experienced this. Read Medical not Medal.
    • You're being a little disingenuous here. It is simply not true that "the area should remain suburban 2/3 storeys maximum" because: -> the area the development is in isn't 2/3 storeys maximum today - as evidenced by the school on the lot adjoining the development to the south, as well as the similarly-sized buildings to the north and east.  -> the SPG doesn't preclude this type of development anyway. This "genie in a bottle" stuff is desperate barrel-scraping. Now you're raising the spectre of a 9 storey building on the Gibbs & Dandy site (the chance would be a fine thing) but also arguing Southwark is too slow to approve things and opposed to development more than 2-3 storeys!
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...