Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I think you really need to ask the Dulwich Estate, to be fair, but they?re not the most...erm, progressive of organisations and while I wish you luck I?d be amazed if they allowed it.


I suspect you?d need to get lawyers involved in some form or other, and then it becomes a question of whether you can afford it. The Estate has some very deep pockets.

Very difficult. The scheme dates back to the 1960s, when leasholders acquired the right to but their freehold. Before then all properties were leasehold from the estate who buried these rights in the leases. The scheme was introduced so that, as freeholds were sold, the same rights were embedded in the land rights - so it is all reggistered with the title to your house. I think it has been considered by the Courts and held to be watertight.


You would be better off speaking as a group to the estate about whatever your issues are - for instance, if it is planning type issues, you could all approach the estate and negotiate. If it is just to avoid the annual charge - that pays for the maintenance of a lot of the spaces around Dulwich - like all the greens surrounded by white posts - as well as the admin on the scheme. If fewer people pay the cost goes up for the rest!

epiphany Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> The issue is unreasonable and

> inconsistent planning rejection and approvals, not

> the service charge.


Yup, that sounds like Dulwich Estate.


My wife once freelanced for an architects firm on a project where an inhabitant of the Estate wanted to convert a building into a very useful space for small businesses to work from for very reasonable rents. A great idea, it never got off the ground because the Estate were simply so hard to deal with in exactly the manner you describe; seemingly no rhyme or reason to their decisions, no consistency, no willingness to explain themselves.

https://www.thedulwichestate.org.uk/property-on-the-estate/residential-freehold/applications-for-building-works


It seems all perfectly clear- it's a great pity that East Dulwich has been allowed to degenerate into the eyesore it has due to ridiculous planning approvals

Why don't a group of you get together and go and see then about planning issues in your road? In my road we had all assumed that there was a limit on what you could do because of the estate, but one house worked with them to come up with a much more extensive extension plan and since then we have all just copied that plan. The estate are a bit obsessed about what the houses look like from the road, and keeping the road homogeneous, but otherwsie they can be a bit more flexible, particularly if they think neighbours are in favour.

uncleglen Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> https://www.thedulwichestate.org.uk/property-on-th

> e-estate/residential-freehold/applications-for-bui

> lding-works

>

> It seems all perfectly clear- it's a great pity

> that East Dulwich has been allowed to degenerate

> into the eyesore it has due to ridiculous planning

> approvals



Have you actually had any dealings with the Estate on matters like this? They are NOT consistent in their behaviour.

  • 4 months later...

You might be able to take over the management by applying for a right to manage (RTM) if you qualify. Gives the leaseholders control of looking after the property. Or you could try collective enfranchisement, where you buy your freehold. There are 2 ways to do this. The first is an informal route - where you ask your freeholder for a cost. This maybe dangerous to do as the freeholder may charge more than should and add further covenants meaning you may still be liable to pay for extra charges. The second is the formal route - You will need a specialist lawyer such as 'Leasehold solutions' and instruct your own surveyor for valuation. THey will help to protect you from any onerous issues and help to get a fair price for enfranchisement.

get more help from the National Leasehold Campaign on facebook and Leasehold Knowledge Partnership. There is so much happening with leasehold reform from Governement and the Law commissioner.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • From the school newsletter:   A New Name for Dog Kennel Hill As you know we have been discussing and consulting with stakeholders about a  name change at DKH for a while. Following engagement with staff, pupils and  families, we gathered all views on a name change for the school and after  careful consideration of the feedback, the Local Committee and the Trust have  agreed with changing the school name to Grove Primary School from  September 2025.  Over the next few months we will begin a gradual process of changing our  name on signage, our website and emails etc. We will keep you updated.  We will be looking at designing a new logo to match the new school name and  will be working closely with a graphic designer to get creative. The school  council will be actively involved in this process. We will share the results with  you as soon as a design has been agreed and confirmed. We will be creating a  new school jumper to replace the old one, once the logo has been finalised. We  will phase this in over time.  We know that this is a welcoming change for some and that there are  parents and children who will be sad about the change. However, as a school  we think it will be a positive change for our school community and we will  work together to ensure that the ethos and culture of DKH will remain!
    • if I think of Corbyn dealing with a global pandemic (a lot of his supporters and some of his family come from the woo end of the spectrum - his brother is a proper anti-vax nut), then the  invasion of Ukraine (Corbyn long record of not exactly condemning Putin even as he killed people on British soil and many other matters, I  really do shudder    
    • If no one else has a problem, then it sugggests that the delivery person may not be aware of any harm and would respond well to a conversation. It also goes without saying that just because no one else has a problem, that the OP is not valid in raising their issues.
    • Remember, you never know what someone else is going through behind closed doors....
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...