Jump to content

Recommended Posts

This makes no sense to me. Its a tax on London as the financial capital of the world and if anyone in this country sees it as a good idea then please expalin to me why this is the case.


Personally I think it will make us less competitive. There are few things that Britain leads the world at these days and this is one of them. It will drag investors away from Europe and into the US/Asia. London will be weakened as a financial centre as compared to New York/Asia and as a result the UK will likely lose huge amounts of employment and corporation taxes. Less money will then be available to fund our huge debts and public expenditure, including public sector salaries and pension obligations.

The phrase is "cutting off the nose to spite the face". We have to punish those bad bankers. Even if it does cripple the economy. That'll teach them... as they move offshore.


Unless the major financial centre of the world impose it in unison, it will fail. And I can't see China falling into line anytime soon as, if the UK/Europe and the US impose this, Hong Kong will become the place to do business.

Well Joseph Stiglitz would be better qualified than most of us to comment and he's a supporter


That doesn't mean he's right, just that it's wrong to call the whole thing anti-London, European-led, anti bank


Paul Krugman, no leftie he - has also weighed in


Against it we have the Taxpayers Alliance - a bunch of barking mad, single-note tub-thumpers


As for Loz's point can we please please please stop with the "bankers will abandon us" thing? Even bankers have said post finanial-crisis that better regulations should have been in place. But prior to teh crisis any move towards ANY kind of regulation was met with that kind of "we will move to somewhere more competitive" rhetoric


That doesn't make me anti-banking at all, but some perspective please

StraferJack Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> As for Loz's point can we please please please stop with the "bankers will abandon us" thing?

> Even bankers have said post finanial-crisis that better regulations should have been in place. But

> prior to teh crisis any move towards ANY kind of regulation was met with that kind of "we will move

> to somewhere more competitive" rhetoric


But isn't that exactly how Blair and Brown positioned the City to leapfrog New York to become the leading financial hub? They reduced regulations (which admittedly helped cause the mess we're in) and the financial institutions duly shifted their operations over here.


In times of global operations it is very simple task to route transactions through alternative countries. And bankers (and the tax they pay) tend to go where the money is.


I have no problem with the tax itself, but unless it is imposed unilaterally it will cause major issues for London. Sweden tried to do it on their own once, and "the volume of bond trading fell by 85%, even though the tax rate on five-year bonds was only 0.003%. The volume of futures trading fell by 98% and the options trading market disappeared."

SJ, that is a poor post. You just hand-picked a couple of economists who (could possibly be seen to) agree with one side of the argument. Besides, Stiglitz supports a world-wide financial transaction tax, which is very different from a Europe-wide tax.


And as if the Taxpayers Alliance are the only ones against the tax?! Come on!!


As for the "bankers will abandon us" argument... when it becomes more effective to do business somewhere else, it will happen (why on earth wouldn't it?)

Blimey - I never expected anyone to take my examples as being the only ones. Of course I cherry-picked but only to reply to Mick's one-dimensional question. And Siglitz supporting a global tax is exactly the point I made later - it's not some idea proposed soley by the EU
The Germans and French would love it as 80% of it would be paid by us....for about a year....and then all the FEX operations etc would move elsewhere and not us or them would get a cent. Global, I'm in, without, never. Foook me if the lunatics ever get their hands on the keys this country will be like Greece...without the climate.
ok. Agree, but I don't think it should be priority on the European table at this exact moment in time for obvious reasons. I think global dialogue on this is reasobnable, but remain a biy cynical about it every happenning (*see also Kyote? or whatever it was)

What's happening now is a result of many things, some of which you correctly identify on another thread re: Euro, but primarily it is a result of the 2008 banking crisis. The dialogues wasn't "permitted" before 2008 ("we don't need regulation!") and since then events have moved on to a degree where it's deemed irrelevant to worry about piddly banking details when so much else is at stake


And it's hard to disagree on one level


But it is odd that SO much banking reform happened post 30's depression, to secure a stable base, when so little has happened this time. The banks/financial industry are calling the shots to a degree unknown back then and it is that which undermines so many government initiatives now.


I appreciate times are different, technology and global economy etc, but my view is that governments need to be able to, at least for a few years, slap down ratings agencies, certain market activities until stability has returned. Then we can look to open things up again. But as things stand what democratic countries need/want and what markets/institutions need/want are very different. An elected government can't stay elected appeasing the markets so it's a vicious circle


It's not an EU created or specific circle so to me, any criticism of the EU alone is also fiddling whilst Rome burns. It doesn't make the critique incorrect but it's not really the point either

StraferJack Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> > Global, I'm in, without, never.


> That's closer to my position than you might think

> from my posts above but as a concept, it should be

> on the table



That's why the thread is entitled "European" Tax on Financial Transactions. The clue is in the question.

katie1997 Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I'm struggling to understand the original question

> Mick Mac. Any chance you could put it into

> language I can easily understand, perhaps using a

> few analogies about fluffy kittens and sparkly

> things? Thanks


I have pm'd you, honey bunny.

Mick Mac Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> *Bob* Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > What does the little lady think, Mick?

>

> She's really not sure what to make of it all. But

> as she used to work for GoldmanSachs she probably

> has more of a clue than most.


I bet the GS traders really miss the elevenses cake trolley...

Chippy Minton Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> It was discussed by the G20 a few weeks ago so (potentially) it would be pretty much global. The

> discussions didn't get anywhere though, not least because Osborne strongly opposes it.


Not to mention China and the US. Without those three on board it's pretty much dead in the water.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Exactly what I said, that Corbyn's group of univeristy politics far-left back benchers would have been a disaster during Covid if they had won the election. Here you go:  BBC News - Ex-union boss McCluskey took private jet flights arranged by building firm, report finds https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cp3kgg55410o The 2019 result was considered one of the worst in living memory for Labour, not only for big swing of seats away from them but because they lost a large number of the Red-wall seats- generational Labour seats. Why? Because as Alan Johnson put it so succinctly: "Corbyn couldn't lead the working class out of a paper bag"! https://youtu.be/JikhuJjM1VM?si=oHhP6rTq4hqvYyBC
    • Agreed and in the meantime its "joe public" who has to pay through higher prices. We're talking all over the shop from food to insurance and everything in between.  And to add insult to injury they "hurt " their own voters/supporters through the actions they have taken. Sadly it gets to a stage where you start thinking about leaving London and even exiting the UK for good, but where to go????? Sad times now and ahead for at least the next 4yrs, hence why Govt and Local Authorities need to cut spending on all but essential services.  An immediate saving, all managerial and executive salaries cannot exceed and frozen at £50K Do away with the Mayor of London, the GLA and all the hanging on organisations, plus do away with borough mayors and the teams that serve them. All added beauracracy that can be dispensed with and will save £££££'s  
    • The minimum wage hikes on top of the NICs increases have also caused vast swathes of unemployment.
    • Exactly - a snap election will make things even worse. Jazzer - say you get a 'new' administration tomorrow, you're still left with the same treasury, the same civil servants, the same OBR, the same think-tanks and advisors (many labour advisors are cross-party, Gauke for eg). The options are the same, no matter who's in power. Labour hasn't even changed the Tories' fiscal rules - the parties are virtually economically aligned these days.  But Reeves made a mistake in trying too hard, too early to make some seismic changes in her first budget as a big 'we're here and we're going to fix this mess, Labour to the rescue' kind of thing . They shone such a big light on the black hole that their only option was to try to fix it overnight. It was a comms clusterfuck.  They'd perhaps have done better sticking to Sunak's quiet, cautious approach, but they knew the gullible public was expecting an 24-hour turnaround miracle.  The NIC hikes are a disaster, I think they'll be reversed soon and enough and they'll keep trying till they find something that sticks.   
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...