Jump to content

Recommended Posts

This makes no sense to me. Its a tax on London as the financial capital of the world and if anyone in this country sees it as a good idea then please expalin to me why this is the case.


Personally I think it will make us less competitive. There are few things that Britain leads the world at these days and this is one of them. It will drag investors away from Europe and into the US/Asia. London will be weakened as a financial centre as compared to New York/Asia and as a result the UK will likely lose huge amounts of employment and corporation taxes. Less money will then be available to fund our huge debts and public expenditure, including public sector salaries and pension obligations.

The phrase is "cutting off the nose to spite the face". We have to punish those bad bankers. Even if it does cripple the economy. That'll teach them... as they move offshore.


Unless the major financial centre of the world impose it in unison, it will fail. And I can't see China falling into line anytime soon as, if the UK/Europe and the US impose this, Hong Kong will become the place to do business.

Well Joseph Stiglitz would be better qualified than most of us to comment and he's a supporter


That doesn't mean he's right, just that it's wrong to call the whole thing anti-London, European-led, anti bank


Paul Krugman, no leftie he - has also weighed in


Against it we have the Taxpayers Alliance - a bunch of barking mad, single-note tub-thumpers


As for Loz's point can we please please please stop with the "bankers will abandon us" thing? Even bankers have said post finanial-crisis that better regulations should have been in place. But prior to teh crisis any move towards ANY kind of regulation was met with that kind of "we will move to somewhere more competitive" rhetoric


That doesn't make me anti-banking at all, but some perspective please

StraferJack Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> As for Loz's point can we please please please stop with the "bankers will abandon us" thing?

> Even bankers have said post finanial-crisis that better regulations should have been in place. But

> prior to teh crisis any move towards ANY kind of regulation was met with that kind of "we will move

> to somewhere more competitive" rhetoric


But isn't that exactly how Blair and Brown positioned the City to leapfrog New York to become the leading financial hub? They reduced regulations (which admittedly helped cause the mess we're in) and the financial institutions duly shifted their operations over here.


In times of global operations it is very simple task to route transactions through alternative countries. And bankers (and the tax they pay) tend to go where the money is.


I have no problem with the tax itself, but unless it is imposed unilaterally it will cause major issues for London. Sweden tried to do it on their own once, and "the volume of bond trading fell by 85%, even though the tax rate on five-year bonds was only 0.003%. The volume of futures trading fell by 98% and the options trading market disappeared."

SJ, that is a poor post. You just hand-picked a couple of economists who (could possibly be seen to) agree with one side of the argument. Besides, Stiglitz supports a world-wide financial transaction tax, which is very different from a Europe-wide tax.


And as if the Taxpayers Alliance are the only ones against the tax?! Come on!!


As for the "bankers will abandon us" argument... when it becomes more effective to do business somewhere else, it will happen (why on earth wouldn't it?)

Blimey - I never expected anyone to take my examples as being the only ones. Of course I cherry-picked but only to reply to Mick's one-dimensional question. And Siglitz supporting a global tax is exactly the point I made later - it's not some idea proposed soley by the EU
The Germans and French would love it as 80% of it would be paid by us....for about a year....and then all the FEX operations etc would move elsewhere and not us or them would get a cent. Global, I'm in, without, never. Foook me if the lunatics ever get their hands on the keys this country will be like Greece...without the climate.
ok. Agree, but I don't think it should be priority on the European table at this exact moment in time for obvious reasons. I think global dialogue on this is reasobnable, but remain a biy cynical about it every happenning (*see also Kyote? or whatever it was)

What's happening now is a result of many things, some of which you correctly identify on another thread re: Euro, but primarily it is a result of the 2008 banking crisis. The dialogues wasn't "permitted" before 2008 ("we don't need regulation!") and since then events have moved on to a degree where it's deemed irrelevant to worry about piddly banking details when so much else is at stake


And it's hard to disagree on one level


But it is odd that SO much banking reform happened post 30's depression, to secure a stable base, when so little has happened this time. The banks/financial industry are calling the shots to a degree unknown back then and it is that which undermines so many government initiatives now.


I appreciate times are different, technology and global economy etc, but my view is that governments need to be able to, at least for a few years, slap down ratings agencies, certain market activities until stability has returned. Then we can look to open things up again. But as things stand what democratic countries need/want and what markets/institutions need/want are very different. An elected government can't stay elected appeasing the markets so it's a vicious circle


It's not an EU created or specific circle so to me, any criticism of the EU alone is also fiddling whilst Rome burns. It doesn't make the critique incorrect but it's not really the point either

StraferJack Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> > Global, I'm in, without, never.


> That's closer to my position than you might think

> from my posts above but as a concept, it should be

> on the table



That's why the thread is entitled "European" Tax on Financial Transactions. The clue is in the question.

katie1997 Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I'm struggling to understand the original question

> Mick Mac. Any chance you could put it into

> language I can easily understand, perhaps using a

> few analogies about fluffy kittens and sparkly

> things? Thanks


I have pm'd you, honey bunny.

Mick Mac Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> *Bob* Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > What does the little lady think, Mick?

>

> She's really not sure what to make of it all. But

> as she used to work for GoldmanSachs she probably

> has more of a clue than most.


I bet the GS traders really miss the elevenses cake trolley...

Chippy Minton Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> It was discussed by the G20 a few weeks ago so (potentially) it would be pretty much global. The

> discussions didn't get anywhere though, not least because Osborne strongly opposes it.


Not to mention China and the US. Without those three on board it's pretty much dead in the water.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Direct link to joint statement : https://thehaguegroup.org/meetings-bogota-en/?link_id=2&can_id=2d0a0048aad3d4915e3e761ac87ffe47&source=email-pi-briefing-no-26-the-bogota-breakthrough&email_referrer=email_2819587&email_subject=pi-briefing-no-26-the-bogot_-breakthrough&&   No. 26 | The Bogotá Breakthrough “The era of impunity is over.” That was the message from Bogotá, Colombia, where governments from across the Global South and beyond took the most ambitious coordinated action since Israel’s genocidal assault on Gaza began 21 months ago. Convened by The Hague Group and co-chaired by the governments of Colombia and South Africa, the Emergency Conference on Palestine brought together 30 states for two days of intensive deliberation — and emerged with a concrete, coordinated six-point plan to restrain Israel’s war machine and uphold international law. States took up the call from their host, Colombian President and Progressive International Council Member Gustavo Petro, who had urged them to be “protagonists together.” Twelve governments signed onto the measures immediately. The rest now have a deadline: 20 September 2025, on the eve of the United Nations General Assembly. The unprecedented six measures commit states to:     Prevent military and dual use exports to Israel.     Refuse Israeli weapons transfers at their ports.     Prevent vessels carrying weapons to Israel under their national flags.     Review all public contracts to prevent public institutions and funds from supporting Israel’s illegal occupation.     Pursue justice for international crimes.     Support universal jurisdiction to hold perpetrators accountable. “We came to Bogotá to make history — and we did,” said Colombian President Gustavo Petro. “Together, we have begun the work of ending the era of impunity. These measures show that we will no longer allow international law to be treated as optional, or Palestinian life as disposable.” The measures are not symbolic. They are grounded in binding obligations under international law — including the International Court of Justice’s July 2024 advisory opinion declaring Israel’s occupation unlawful, and September 2024’s UN General Assembly Resolution ES-10/24, which gave states a 12-month deadline to act. UN Special Rapporteur on the situation of human rights in the occupied Palestinian territory Francesca Albanese called them “a momentous step forward.” “The Hague Group was born to advance international law in an era of impunity,” said South Africa’s Foreign Minister, Ronald Lamola. “The measures adopted in Bogotá show that we are serious — and that coordinated state action is possible.” The response from Washington was swift — and revealing. In a threatening statement to journalists, a US State Department spokesperson accused The Hague Group of “seeking to isolate Israel” and warned that the US would “aggressively defend our interests, our military, and our allies, including Israel, from such coordinated legal and diplomatic” actions. But instead of deterring action, the threats have only clarified the stakes. In Bogotá, states did not flinch. They acted — and they invite the world to join them. The deadline for further states to take up the measures is now two months away. And with it, the pressure is mounting for governments across the world — from Brazil to Ireland, Chile to Spain — to match words with action. As Albanese said, “the clock is now ticking for states — from Europe to the Arab world and beyond — to join them.” This is not a moment to observe. It is a moment to act. Share the Joint Statement from Bogotá and popularise the six measures. Write to your elected representative and your government and demand they sign on before 20 September. History was made in Bogotá. Now, it’s up to all of us to ensure it becomes reality, that Palestinian life is not disposable and international law is not optional. The era of impunity is coming to an end. Palestine is not alone. In solidarity, The Progressive International Secretariat  
    • Most countries charge for entry to museums and galleries, often a different rate for locals (tax payers) and foreign nationals. The National Gallery could do this, also places like the Museums in South Kensington, the British Library and other tax-funded institutions. Many cities abroad add a tourist tax to hotel bills. It means tourists help pay for public services.
    • Having just been to Co-op to redeem a 50p off Co-op members' card voucher on an item that is now 50p more than it was last week, Tesco can't come soon enough
    • Surely that depends on the amount.  It can be quite piffling.  
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...