Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Not for the chef, perhaps. The difference is cost of operations. If you want to retain choice of places to GO and eat, then these dark kitchens are very much a bad thing, as not only are "front of house" restaurants struggling due to rates and rents, oversupply on the street, etc but they are being undercut by this type of kitchen.


something very few are likely contemplating is the services such as deliveroo and uber eats do not share the customer's details with the restaurants using them, and so the resto cannot market to these customers, nor can they be assured of their return business (IF) a dark kitchen is set up in their place.


Deliveroo (for example) are building a database of who wants what food where, when, at what price and how long they'll wait for it. This is extremely valuable information and I would be very surprised if they do not use it to develop their own restaurants/kitchens or "collaborations" with others. The manner in which Amazon has depleted the high streets is going to happen for restaurants, too. It's a worrying state of affairs, and I'm not sure many establishments realise the danger they could be in.

A better way is to take a college course or find a good youtube channel for the kind of food you would normally order in and learn to cook it yourself. That way you won't be supporting exploitative labour practices, have food prepared in a hygienic environment, have peace of mind regarding the freshness and quality of ingredients and not be destroying your long term health by not overloading the "meal" with sugar and salt used as preservatives and msg to trick you into thinking the slop you've just [over] paid for actually tastes remotely good.

When Deliveroo started, it was supposed to be a "premium" service, i.e. delivering food from the type of restaurants that wouldn't normally deliver.


Now they're reheating pre-prepared food in metal boxes in industrial estates, and charging restaurant prices for it.

se22cat Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> A better way is to take a college course or find a

> good youtube channel for the kind of food you

> would normally order in and learn to cook it

> yourself. That way you won't be supporting

> exploitative labour practices, have food prepared

> in a hygienic environment, have peace of mind

> regarding the freshness and quality of ingredients

> and not be destroying your long term health by not

> overloading the "meal" with sugar and salt used as

> preservatives and msg to trick you into thinking

> the slop you've just paid for actually tastes

> remotely good.


The competition in London, especially between eateries and takeaways is going to lead to iffy practices...I had some disgusting spare ribs from a local place about 18 months ago and have not had a takeaway since...

If you can read a recipe and get supplies in then you can cook imo

Perhaps irrationally I always found the idea of Deliveroo unpleasant. Guy loaded up with takeaways from a place you couldn't be bothered walking/cycling to yourself, cycling in the cold driving rain for ?7 an hour plus ?1 per delivery. And now the thing he's bringing to you isn't even the thing you actually really thought you were getting.


(Yes, there are many crappy minimum wage jobs out there, and no one coerces anyone into working for Deliveroo).

fishbiscuits Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> With Deliveroo, you can tell if it's coming from

> their own kitchen as it's labelled "editions".

> Just Eat is always just a normal takeaway.


Yes - I noticed the Deliveroo "Editions"


The website tried to push me on to it as if it was preferable (but I did notice what it was so must be pretty clear).

Jennys Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Stuck recently for many hours in King?s A and E

> and getting really hungry, I was grateful when my

> son ordered for me, from North Wales where he

> lives, a Franco Manca pizza which arrived within

> 15 minutes of being ordered.



I was in the children's bit of the A and E in King's not long ago, and there was what appeared to be a whole family in there eating burgers and chips.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • I do hope NOT. He's backed by GB News which focus's predominantly on immigration while the BBC focus predominantly on the Israel - Gazza conflict.   
    • Everyone gets the point that Corbynites try to make with the "total number of votes cast" statistic, it's just a specious one.  In 2017, Corbyn's Labour got fewer votes than May's Tories (both the percentage of votes and aggregate number of votes). In 2019, Corbyn's Labour fewer votes than Johnson's Tories (both the percentage of votes and aggregate number of votes); and he managed to drop 2.7 million votes or 6.9% of vote share between the two elections. I repeat, he got trounced by Boris F***ing Johnson and the Tories after the Brexit omnishambles. It is not true that a "fairer" electoral system would have seen Labour beat the Tories: Labour simply got fewer votes than the Tories. Corbyn lost twice. There is no metric by which he won the general election. His failure to win was a disaster for the UK, and let Johnson and Truss and Sunak into office. Corbynites have to let go of this delusion that Corbyn but really won somehow if you squint in a certain way. It is completely irrelevant that Labour under Corbyn got more votes than Labour under Starmer. It is like saying Hull City was more successful in its 2014 FA Cup Final than Chelsea was in its 2018 FA Cup Final, because Hull scored 2 goals when Chelsea only scored 1. But guess what - Chelsea won its game and Hull City lost. Corbyn's fans turned out to vote for him - but an even larger group of people who found him repellant were motivated enough to show up and vote Tory.
    • I guess its the thing these days to demonstrate an attitude, in this instance seemingly of the negative kind, instead of taking pride in your work and have standards then 🤷‍♀️
    • Nope, I'd just get on with my day and forget about it. And I wouldn't report them on the basis that they might spill my coffee in the future.  However the OP seems to think that this young woman is deliberately pushing her bell, slamming her gate etc, having repeatedly been asked not to. I'd wager the woman is a bit pee'd off and there's a bit of a stand-off going on. Best course of action is to go out, take the parcel, smile sweetly, say hello, tell her you hope she's having a nice day / staying cool etc, in a way that comes across as genuine and not pass-agg,  and to let it diffuse. Might find it calms down a bit.  But I like the girl hate the idea of her being denigrated on here when she works so hard. 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...