Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Rye Lane needs to be closed to replace major gas mains along it and the latest estimate, since the Southwark News report below, is that this will take 60 weeks from January 2019 to April 2020. This will require major excavations and only a pavement for pedestrians past the works is expected to be kept open.

https://www.southwarknews.co.uk/news/rye-lane-gas-network-upgrade-set-to-bring-more-traffic-jams-to-peckham/


A diversion for buses will run via Copeland Road, which will become very congested, meaning more people are likely to drive off East Dulwich Road to cut through the Bellenden Road area. With the main redevelopment of Peckham Rye station starting in spring 2019 and due to continue to autumn 2021, hope somehow the most disruptive bits can happen at the same time. Otherwise there could be 3 years of disruption for buses, cycling and driving from East Dulwich.

Good spot goosey-goosey, seems the council plans to dig up Bellenden, Lyndhurst and a whole host of other roads in 2019 for the Spine. So could not come at a worse time whether you travel by bike, bus or car.


Honestly can't see how the Spine can go ahead as planned now. The council has a legal duty to minimise disruption to the road network by not having multiple streets blocked by road works. Also opening its flagship cycle route at a time when the streets it runs along are gridlocked won't encourage more people to cycle and will damage both Southwark's and the Spine's reputation.


Apparently Transport for London has even refused to let Southwark use its cycle quietway branding for the route as the Spine(less) proposals simply failed to reduce motor traffic or safely separate people cycling. Unfortunately while the proposals were also rejected by a resounding 2/3 of people who responded, they were quietly rubber stamped days before the council shut down for the May elections. Maybe there is a silver lining if this all means the Spine gets a rethink.

Thanks for posting all this. Whilst it would appear the work does need to be done, I hope that Southwark will see sense and not have this and the station works happening at the same time, yet that does seem to happen a lot! But what came first: The station plans or the gas main improvement plans?

The gas lot (sorry I think I mean something gas networks) have wanted to do this since 2011.


Apparently has now become urgent.


And the gas lot seem to want to send cyclists the same way they are sending all the other traffic possibly resulting in cyclists getting squashed as they make the turn under the bridge on Copeland Road - and that is apart from the right-hand or left-hand turn back onto the main drag to get back onto the canal path.

PeckhamRose Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Oh come on, the gas company are not out to kill

> cyclists. They are out to improve a gas network.


Well, it's a bit like the Tour de Peckham down Rye Lane at the moment during rush hour, so these cyclists will have to go somewhere and if that includes sharp turns amongst traffic i can see it being dangerous.

Before anyone gets too hysterical about this, shall we wait for some facts? The Southwark News report says that "residents fear it could take months" - where does the sixty weeks figure quoted above come from (I've looked all over and can't find any information)? Also the gas company says the work will be done in several phases so it's not as if Rye Lane will be fully closed for a year. It might be awful or it might be slightly inconvenient, but it's not helpful for everyone to create these apocalyptic scenarios (and start shoehorning their own agendas about blocking the Southwark Spine etc) before we have any idea of what the scope or nature of the works will be!

rollflick Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Unfortunately while the proposals

> were also rejected by a resounding 2/3 of people

> who responded, they were quietly rubber stamped

> days before the council shut down for the May

> elections.


Has this been published somewhere? I thought that the consultation hadn't been responded to formally and no decision had been made?

Sure, sources as follows:

On 60 week closure, below is an extract of email allegedly from Cllr Richard Livingstone obtained by Southwark Cyclists (SC), also confirmed by Southwark's Traffic Manager on site visit on 11 October 2018 that was attended by them:


"I understand that the closure will be for 60 weeks from January, as Southern Gas Network are having to replace the two gas mains under the street. The pavements will remain open to pedestrians and SGN will compensate businesses for any loss of earnings. SGN first approached the council about doing this in 2011. There has been discourse between the council and them since that time and it is clear that the council could not justify putting the work off for longer.


A diversion along Copeland Road to the east of Rye Lane has been identified and this will be signposted and advertised.


I have asked officers to put in place a second route for cyclists to the west of Rye Lane and for this to be signposted. Whilst I don?t mind cars having to take a longer route around Rye Lane, I think it would be unfair for cyclists travelling north-westwards to not have a quicker option.



Regards

Councillor Richard Livingstone"


alex_b, Spine route proposals consultation showing only 28% of respondents in favour can be found here: https://consultations.southwark.gov.uk/environment-leisure/eastdulwichtopeckham/

There is still the statutory stage of publishing traffic orders in 'late 2018' to go through but that's normally just a formality.


In terms of closure yes you're absolutely right Rendelharris that the whole of Rye Lane won't be closed, it will be a rolling closure but that still means larger vehicles in particular all the buses will need to go round via Copeland Road during the whole duration of works. The problem for cycling is that the streets to the west are some of the least intuitive to navigate in the borough due to the mix of one-ways and diagonals. Southwark Cyclists are proposing permeability improvements to make it easier for people cycling to skirt round the blocked bit of Rye Lane to the west. That would also reduce the pressure on Copeland, helping bus users & drivers. For what it's worth all cycling groups objected to the current plans for the Spine, preferring the previous plan to remove the Bellenden gyratory that by comparison received a majority of consultees in favour.

The rolling closures of Rye Lane when they did the water/sewer pipes a couple of years ago were awful, traffic regularly backed up, buses terminated after just a few stops travelled, and not helped by the fact that there are huge numbers of regular deliveries that need to take place to the front of the shops there (as there is no back access or place to deliver). This sounds like a bigger project. Not really looking forward to it.

jimbo1964 Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> As a cycle commuter I do anything to avoid Rye

> Lane anyway.



It?s not too bad if you?re there before 7.15. Although the amount of traffic lights at the moment are a bit ridiculous.

  • 2 weeks later...

Rye Lane closure: Exhibition and drop in at Rye Lane Chapel in Rye Lane (near Primark) on November 1st 4-7pm. Loads of detail of bus diversions etc. This is being organised by Southern Gas Networks. There will also be details of the rolling programme of works.


Full discussion at Peckham and Nunhead Community Council on Weds November 14th. Meeting at Harris Academy(112 Peckham Road SE15 5DZ) starts at 7pm


work to start Monday Jan 7th 2019 and last 13mths.


https://southwarkcyclists.org.uk/rye-lane-to-close-from-january-7th/

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Rant ahead: You're not one of them but unfortunately, there's a substrate of posters here that do very little except moan and come up with weird conspiracy theories. They're immediately highly critical of just about any change, and their initial assumption is that everyone else is a total fucking contemptible idiot. For example: don't you think that the people who run the libraries will have considered the impact of timing of reconstruction on library users? (In fact, we know they have - because they've made arrangements at other libraries to attempt to mitigate the disruption). After all, these are the people that spend their whole working week thinking about libraries and dealing with library users (and the kids especially). You don't go into the library game for the chicks and fame - so it's fair to assume that librarians are committed to public service and public access to libraries, including by kids. Likewise the built environment people (engineers, architects, construction managers, project managers, construction contractors, subcontractors or whoever is on this job) are told to minimise disruption on every job they do. The thing that occurs to us as amateurs within 30 seconds of us seeing something is probably not something a full time professional hasn't thought about! Southwark Council, the NHS, TfL, Dulwich Estate, Thames Water, Openreach - they're not SPECTRE factories filled with malevolent chaosmongers trying to persecute anyone. They're mostly filled with people who understand their job and try to do their best with what they've been given - just like all of us. Nobody is perfect or immune from challenge, and that's fair enough, but why not at least start from the assumption that there's a good reason why things have been done the way they have? Any normal person would be pleased that their busy, pretty, lively local library is getting refurbished, and will have more space and facilities for kids and teens, and will be more efficient to run and warmer in winter. But no, EDT_Forumite_752 had kids who did an exam 20 years ago, and this makes them an expert on library refurbishment who can see it's all just stuff and nonsense for the green agenda and why can't it all be put off... 😡😡😡
    • I completely misread the previous post, sorry. For some reason I thought the mini cooper was also a police vehicle, DUH.
    • This has given me ideas for the ginger wine I love, that no one else likes!      
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...