Jump to content

Wooden bed nest for sale and other baby items by Gro


Recommended Posts

Hello!


We have a wooden bed nest which has been modified under the new guidelines for sale for ?55. Ideal in the first 4 months so you don't have to get out of your own bed as the bed nest can be attached and stand right next to you own bed.


Has been so useful for our second baby (we never had one for our first). Smoke free household and bed nest comes with a mattress which has been very well looked after.



Other items for sale:


Gro egg thermometer (like new): ?5

2 Gro black out blinds (very good condition): ?15

Snooze shade Original (like new): ?9

Skip Hop Alphabet Zoo Activity Gym from JoJo's (Original ?60): ?25



Free books:


Secrets of the Baby-Wisperer (Tracy Hogg)

A guide for calmer toddlers & happier parents (Sarah Ockwell-Smith)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...
  • 1 month later...

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Latest Discussions

    • I believe around 57% of the 5,538 people who were part of the self selecting sample making up the original consultation, opposed the LTN. So just over 3,000 people. This was around 3 years ago now. I think there’s something like 40,000+ living across se22 and SE21 🤷‍♂️  The LTN is a minority interest at best. Whilst it’s an obsession for a small number on the transport thread who strongly oppose it, I suspect most locals quietly approve of the improvements made to that junction. …and we still haven’t heard who has supposedly been pressurising the emergency services and how (are we seriously going with the far left / the commies)? Is anyone willing to stand up and support the 'One' claim that people are partially covering their plates and driving through the filters due to inadequate signage? Again, it all sounds a little ridiculous / desperate. Feels like it may be time for them to start coming to terms with the changes.
    • Okay Earl, of those 'consulted' how many voices were in favour of the junction and how many against? Were there more responses in favour or more against? This local junction change is being driven by Southwark Labour Councillors- not as you assert by Central Govt. Also, if consultations are so irrelevant as indicators of meaningful local support in the way you seem to imply, why do organisations like Southwark Cyclists constantly ask their members to respond to all and any consultation on LTN's and CPZ's?  
    • You could apply the same argument to any kind of penalty as an effective deterrent.  Better than doing nothing. 
    • Check the link I provided above. It gives a very full account of where the push for LTNs came from, (in brief, central government). The consultation did not show that the majority of local residents were against the LTN. Not for the first time, you’ve confused a ‘consultation’ with a ‘referendum’. The outcome of local elections (which many opposed to LTNs excitedly promoted as a referendum on the scheme at the time…until they lost), suggests they are actually quite popular. All the polling on LTNs generally, also shows strong majority support across London.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...