Jump to content

Recommended Posts

My initial thought is that they shouldn't be in the squad in the first place if they know the birth is likely to be during the match. I don't think they should be dropping everything and leaving a job half done.


That said, I definitely don't think they should be expected to miss the birth of their child, you wouldn't be in most jobs.

Peckhamgatecrasher Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Controversial question: what do you think of

> players rushing back to be at wifey's side when

> they are giving birth?

>

> I rather think it's somewhat unprofessional.



I'm sure the wives don't think its unprofessional. Giving birth is not easy - although I have not tried it, it certainly doesn't look easy.

Well the answer would be that if you know you?re having a baby you shouldn?t go on tour then.


But what team wouldn?t want a player like Shane Warne or Kevin Pietersen there for at least 3 out of five tests if possible. Trouble is when you let them do it then you have to let the Ashley Giles? of this world, who you could probably live without, do it to.


Should the women?s team be given time off to give birth?

Keef Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

That said, I definitely don't think they should be expected to miss the birth of their child, you wouldn't be in most jobs.


Keef - in my old job it was said you could be present at conception or birth but not both

Peckhamgatecrasher Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Bloody Nora - I forgot the final was on.

>

> You and I could fall out kpc, I am a Maid of Kent!


PGC - have been following Warwickshire for a long time now. First ever game was a John Player League match against Kent somewhere in the mists of time.

  • 2 weeks later...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • As I had a moan on here about the truly abysmal Christmas meal we had at The Cherry Tree last year, I am redressing the balance by saying we had a really excellent Christmas meal at Franklins last night. Every course was absolutely delicious and  really well cooked. The staff were lovely despite being exhausted and run off their feet. In particular, my sea bass was a large portion and cooked to perfection, in stark contrast to the small dried up portion The Cherry Tree provided, from which I was barely able to scrape a teaspoonful of flesh (that is not an exaggeration). And our Franklins meal cost less than half what we paid at The Cherry Tree (to be fair, that was on Christmas Day so the Cherry Tree costs would have been higher, but that doesn't excuse the appalling quality meal). Thank you again to Franklins for restoring our faith in eating out at Christmas! 
    • That is almost too ridiculous to answer but I'll take the bait. You are comparing a national charity with one branch of a small charity. Cats Protection has around 34 dedicated rehoming centres. CHAT has two, Lewisham & Canning Town and a sanctuary in Sussex. So if Cats Protection have homed 34,000 cats, thats an average of 1000 per branch. From memory this years total so far for Lewisham CHAT was over 980. I saw a few homed this weekend so we may well reach 1000 for this year. The same as Cats Protection. No need for head scratching.    
    • Actually, if it was factory fitted then it's location would be documented. It's the fact that it can be fitted in different places which means that it's difficult for thieves to locate. 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...