Jump to content

Recommended Posts

My initial thought is that they shouldn't be in the squad in the first place if they know the birth is likely to be during the match. I don't think they should be dropping everything and leaving a job half done.


That said, I definitely don't think they should be expected to miss the birth of their child, you wouldn't be in most jobs.

Peckhamgatecrasher Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Controversial question: what do you think of

> players rushing back to be at wifey's side when

> they are giving birth?

>

> I rather think it's somewhat unprofessional.



I'm sure the wives don't think its unprofessional. Giving birth is not easy - although I have not tried it, it certainly doesn't look easy.

Well the answer would be that if you know you?re having a baby you shouldn?t go on tour then.


But what team wouldn?t want a player like Shane Warne or Kevin Pietersen there for at least 3 out of five tests if possible. Trouble is when you let them do it then you have to let the Ashley Giles? of this world, who you could probably live without, do it to.


Should the women?s team be given time off to give birth?

Keef Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

That said, I definitely don't think they should be expected to miss the birth of their child, you wouldn't be in most jobs.


Keef - in my old job it was said you could be present at conception or birth but not both

Peckhamgatecrasher Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Bloody Nora - I forgot the final was on.

>

> You and I could fall out kpc, I am a Maid of Kent!


PGC - have been following Warwickshire for a long time now. First ever game was a John Player League match against Kent somewhere in the mists of time.

  • 2 weeks later...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Sorry but I think it's best if people just check things for themselves when they buy things. In three shops/restaurants (from some years back) I just avoid the places concerned, as in all three  cases I was pretty sure it wasn't a genuine mistake, and in one place  it happened more than once and usually late at night.
    • Sorry Sue - me again. This has been on my mind all day, it's a big bug bear of mine. If you don't mind - please can you private message me some of these shops so I can cross reference / add to my AVOID list.  Thanks in advance. Let's make sure this doesn't happen this Christmas, particularly as we head into sales season. Even more problematic in my experience.
    • Pity you didn't quote what you are referring to, Mal. I didn't see the previous post, and my mind is boggling 😮
    • The Cherry Tree was absolutely excellent for a while when a youngish couple ran it and brought in a really good chef. It was them who renamed it The Cherry Tree. They were really turning it around. The chef did fantastic Scotch eggs, and one of the best roasts I've ever had. If memory serves the then owner,  for some reason known only to himself, took a dislike to them and what they were doing and sacked them all. And yes we weren't expecting a top class  meal last Christmas, and we left it too late to book anywhere else, but we weren't expecting it for a hundred pounds EACH to be quite as terrible as it was. Stupid us. Not sure why you are confused by my post, Jazzer? Did I misremember? Now it's got even more confusing because my posts have been merged and your confused emoji is shown at the bottom of the second one instead of the first 🤣
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...