Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Not sure the Mash has the right angle there, Brendan - amusing as it is. ECB knows exactly, and has done for ages, that all the power and money lies with the BCCI - and that's why they don't know how to play this.


It's not a question of surprise and resentment at the uppity colonials - the ECB is alone in this in that the IPL is taking place during its own domestic season - giving it a headache other Boards don't have.


Sure, other countries have had tours planned that clashed (Oz to Pakistan - India to Zim) but they have conveniently found reasons to cancel them.


If I were the ECB cricket board I would be working with the players likely to get contracts to sort out a plan that would allow them to play some cricket in the IPL as long as it doesn't detract from their international commitments or preparation. The contracted players play precious little county cricket as it is so that's less of an issue. Clarke made a decent point - how would cricket public and media react if next year most of the Test squad came back ill-prepared for the Ashes after 6 weeks hit and giggle in India?


But given the idiot Gatting is head of cricket partnerships, it seems unlikely there'll be any sensible solution and we're heading for an unnecessary rift - and resentment between players and ECB.


And PGC, the first to do a Greig has already done it - Dimitri Mascarenhas - but as a ODI player only, and not on a central contract, he has less to lose and has probably made the right gamble that it won't unduly affect his career anyway. The sparks will fly when the Pieterson/ Flintoff offers are made next season.

It all depends on the accent really PGC and more specifically whether the South African in question is English or Afrikaans. Although if we are being pedantic it is an Afrikaans name and therefore the Afrikaans version would be strictly correct. Although I pronounce it the English way.


Anyway it looks like it has fallen on the IPL to exercise some common sense in the matter.*


http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport1/hi/cricket/7339289.stm


*Not the mispronunciation of names that is. although considering the problem most of us have with Indian, Bangladeshi and especially Sri Lankan names someone should probably publish a book on it.

Some South Africans I know pronounce it: "thatfukehnturncoatPieterson".


Bindra needs to be seen as the good guy, given he has the ICC-sanctioned competition and has manoevred the ICL into the rebel corner.

He also is shoulders with the ECB and Clarke at the moment because he wants something back. What does he want back? The ECB not getting too cosy with Sandford, and to start cross-promoting its own version of the league in a competitive way.


Look at his buzzword - "global" - what he's after is the expansion of his league to become a world event. He needs the ICC on side for that, and for that he needs the buy-in of the members - even fusty old reactionary, neo-colonial, useless ECB (which invented 20/20).

When I think of cricket, I think of fat botham and fat lamb and all the other fat gits who call themselves pro cricketers.

How can they be taken seriously as sportsmen?

How can we expect to do well against full time pros like the aussies, when we wheel out the last batch of school leavers and expect to win?

The lack of professionalism here makes me(6)

  • 5 weeks later...
  • 3 weeks later...

I know that right now England still have a few games to play against New Zealand. But who really cares about how they do against an obscure Welsh county anyway?


The biggest question at the moment is whether the English sun will shine long enough for SA to win all the test matches this summer.

Anyone catch that documentary on Basil D'Oliveira last night on BBC4? It was pretty good, but left me feeling a bit anti-Colin Cowdrey who, since I'm from Kent, has always been a hero.


On topic, they showed a test at the Oval in 1968 which was rained off until members of the public jumped up to help drain the pitch and sweep the excess water away - ee, one doesn't see sights like that nowadays, made me proper proud.

Was it a repeat of the Peter Oborne film? Seen it before if so, and yes Obourne very much fingered Cowdrey as having done the dirty deed behind closed doors - in the most two faced manner.


IIRC the film kind of came out of Oborne's biography of D'Oliveira which is brilliant - read it if you can. Oborne doesn't nail down every aspect of his theory of a high level political stitch up between the MCC and the Saf government - some of it is pretty circumstantial. But he's brilliant on placing D'Oliveira as a player in world terms.


And if you like John Arlott, he comes out of it very well, btw.


EDITED to get the writer's name right.

The Mag has WiFi and good Pizza going for it. This makes it a very good venue for WFP while the cricket is on.


It is still not going to be the same as spending a weekday afternoon at the bar in the CPT while the sun streams in through the windows and the match unfolds on the screen above the door. ADrinking shooters with the bar staff at lunch time and passing the time of day with the daytime regulars.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Link to petition if anyone would like to object: Londis Off-License Petition https://chng.it/9X4DwTDRdW
    • He did mention it's share of freehold, I’d be very cautious with that. It can turn into a nightmare if relationships with neighbours break down. My brother had a share of freehold in a flat in West Hampstead, and when he needed to sell, the neighbour refused to sign the transfer of the freehold. What followed was over two years of legal battles, spiralling costs and constant stress. He lost several potential buyers, and the whole sale fell through just as he got a job offer in another city. It was a complete disaster. The neighbour was stubborn and uncooperative, doing everything they could to delay the process. It ended in legal deadlock, and there was very little anyone could do without their cooperation. At that point, the TA6 form becomes the least of your worries; it’s the TR1 form that matters. Without the other freeholder’s signature on that, you’re stuck. After seeing what my brother went through, I’d never touch a share of freehold again. When things go wrong, they can go really wrong. If you have a share of freehold, you need a respectful and reasonable relationship with the others involved; otherwise, it can be costly, stressful and exhausting. Sounds like these neighbours can’t be reasoned with. There’s really no coming back from something like this unless they genuinely apologise and replace the trees and plants they ruined. One small consolation is that people who behave like this are usually miserable behind closed doors. If they were truly happy, they’d just get on with their lives instead of trying to make other people’s lives difficult. And the irony is, they’re being incredibly short-sighted. This kind of behaviour almost always backfires.  
    • I had some time with him recently at the local neighbourhood forum and actually was pretty impressed by him, I think he's come a long way.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...