Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Hello, an elderly neighbour of mine was discharged from hospital she has numerous health conditions including cancer,stroke and renal problems. She was discharged from hospital 2 days ago and they actually dropped her home at 11:45 pm. Is it me, or do other people think this was acceptable? Due to no careers being available she was left in her wheelchair all night. I don?t want to skate the NHS because I know they are under a lot of pressure but I do believe this is wrong.
I think this is entirely wrong. I'm astonished that there wasn't a check to ensure that someone was at home to provide care for her on discharge. She sounds very vulnerable, if it were me I would at least bring the matter to a relevant person's attention and ask for an explanation as to why it was deemed appropriate.

Blimey - no that's not acceptable ! And if she gets pressure sores from sitting ( and potentially ) weeing in w/c all night ,it's going to end up costing the NHS more .Oh ,and possibly inconviencing the poor person .


I think contact PALS at the hospital and explain what has happened .

I can't believe that the hospital just discharged her without checking - something has surely gone wrong .


Delayed hospital transport ?? Agency failure ? Promise of carer on discharge not delivered ?


But definitely bring to attention of PALS ,hopefully they can find out what went wrong .

Yes the NHS is under a lot of pressure and Kings do a wonderful job under very difficult circumstances but this is totally unacceptable. An elderly vulnerable neighbour of mine was given an assessment and appropriate arrangements made prior to discharge involving carers and the district nurse. It?s crazy and dangerous for her to have been brought home at that time of day when no support was available.
Generally the elderly 'block beds' because there is nowhere safe for them to be discharged to - in this instance this lady should also have been a bed-blocker, clearly. This should be reported - I would guess hold-ups in discharge (transport issues?) and failure to join-up care has meant that what was planned (probably that morning) as a safe discharge turned out not to be, but it should certainly be reported if only to make sure the proper processes are in place and followed to avoid a recurrence. At this time of year there are often bed shortages and the critically ill must be cared for, but some balance has to be made.
I had a similar situation with a friend about a month ago. He had been discovered laying in his flat, he had maybe been there about three days. After a few days in Kings, they discharged him. He could not walk, he lives in a upstairs flat. We were stonewalled when we talked about a care plan. It was surreal, their only concern was filling in a form saying a district nurse would call and so he had been been passed in community care. After two days on our sofa we had to get him back to A&E and they only kept him in because we sat with him there for eight hours.

Definitely complain.


That surely can't be hospital policy, so something has gone wrong, and somebody along the line should have realised that something was going wrong.


A complaint to PALS will be investigated, and at the very least may prevent this happening to anybody else.

Her carers were arranged for 5.30 but wasn?t transported home until 11.30 , so obviously Ambulances were busy , I phoned her social worker at hospital no reply , then they phoned me to say district nurse couldn?t make it today would I give her injection:( don?t want this happening to anyone else . They might not have someone to call to help .sad affairs 😢

intexasatthe moment Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> then they phoned me to say district nurse couldn?t

> make it today would I give her injection - WHAT

> !

>

> Now that I do find outrageous .



So do I, but cynically I suspect it all stems from the present NHS underfunding/understaffing whilst the effing Tories prepare to privatise the NHS.


Not that that excuses any individual/systemic failings in the sorry saga above.

Sue Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> intexasatthe moment Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > then they phoned me to say district nurse

> couldn?t

> > make it today would I give her injection -

> WHAT

> > !

> >

> > Now that I do find outrageous .

>

>

> So do I, but cynically I suspect it all stems from

> the present NHS underfunding/understaffing whilst

> the effing Tories prepare to privatise the NHS.

>

> Not that that excuses any individual/systemic

> failings in the sorry saga above.


The f-ing tories eh?

https://www.theguardian.com/society/2018/aug/05/how-virgin-became-one-of-the-uks-leading-healthcare-providers

And as a person who has worked in the NHS fyi EVERY single piece of equipment etc is bought from private companies....the only state VERY subsidised area is teaching the staff- who promptly bugger off

uncleglen Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------


> The f-ing tories eh?

> https://www.theguardian.com/society/2018/aug/05/ho

> w-virgin-became-one-of-the-uks-leading-healthcare-

> providers

> And as a person who has worked in the NHS fyi

> EVERY single piece of equipment etc is bought from

> private companies....the only state VERY

> subsidised area is teaching the staff- who

> promptly bugger off


Yes, the f%^ing Tories indeed. If you read that article properly (get a grownup to help if necessary) you'll see that Labour asked Virgin to look at the NHS and report on what could be done to improve it. Labour did not award Virgin Care any NHS contracts for the simple reason that Virgin Care did not exist before 2012 (previously Assura Medical from 2010), the year it gained its first NHS contracts. All of the ?2bn of NHS contracts awarded to Virgin Care in its entire history were won under the coalition or Tory governments. Wrong again.

I find it incredulous that anyone could even begin to think that Tory policy has not led to the crisis in the NHS and specifically adult social care.


Uncleglen, go and talk to any local authority and ask them how central government funding cuts, almost 60% worth have impacted on adult social care since 2010. Because it is actually worse than whatever fantasy you have going on in your head. Osborne deliberately sought to shrink the state to levels not seen since 1930 - a totally unsustainable level of cuts vs genuine need. And that is before we get onto other health impacts, like mental health.

Quite Nxjen. Uncleglen might want to look at what any treatment or operation costs for the NHS and see how much more it costs in the private sector. He then might also want to ask why cuts have led to more NHS patients being outsourced to private companies at that increased cost to the NHS. And then come back and have a conversation about the Tory cuts that have exacerbated that situation.

Complain to PALS (also to Southwark News).

Kings (and other hospitals) were informed some time ago that elderly/vulnerable patients should not be discharged in the evening as even though a care package may have been arranged and the hospital informed of the details of the agency and time of first call, they should have realised that the patient would not have made it home in time.


When I was working, we used to inform the ward that unless patient was discharged and would be at home for x time, they should not discharge someone who did not have a reliable relative or friend waiting for them at home.

Care Agencies rarely work past 9 am. Also ambulance crews should check that patient could transfer independently in a chair or bed before leaving the house. If person was non weight bearing, the crew should assist into bed.

Pugwash thanks - good to know that there are/should be procedures to avoid this sort of situation .


I suppose it's possible that the person herself when it became obvious that she would be v late home fed up with waiting and longing to be out of the hospital and at home ,resisted attempts to get her to stay . And I suppose it's also possible that she dismissed the ambulance crew and didn't want them putting her to bed .


I find it hard to think that the ambulance staff just abandonded her in her wheelchair at midnight . Well ,I hope there's more to the whole sorry event .

Complain to PALS (also to Southwark News).

Kings (and other hospitals) were informed some time ago that elderly/vulnerable patients should not be discharged in the evening as even though a care package may have been arranged and the hospital informed of the details of the agency and time of first call, they should have realised that the patient would not have made it home in time.


When I was working, we used to inform the ward that unless patient was discharged and would be at home for x time, they should not discharge someone who did not have a reliable relative or friend waiting for them at home.

Care Agencies rarely work past 9 am. Also ambulance crews should check that patient could transfer independently in a chair or bed before leaving the house. If person was non weight bearing, the crew should assist into bed.




SORRY SHOULD HAVE SAID 9 PM not 9 AM. Some folk are desperate to get out of hospital and do not really appreciate that they are in a weak state and cannot climb stairs/get into bed etc and are too proud to seek help.



I recall many years ago that an elderly person arrived very late evening at a local care home - the Ambulance Service had been given the wrong address for person - the home took her/him in for the night and the next day sent them back to the hospital. Worse is when family/friends say that they will be at the property to let in discharged patient and approximate time is given for discharge and when ambulance crew get to the property - cannot get in so end up returning patient to hospital ward to find that their bed has already been allocated to someone else!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • OOOOooooOOOooohhhHHHHHH 👜 👜 👜 
    • That's actually why the Sherlock Holmes stories were so popular. There was so little crime people found it exciting to imagine robberies and murders happening in London.
    • Yes, because of course there were no violent robberies in the olden days. Pretty much no crime happened at all I believe through the entire Victorian era.
    • Hi all, Im a Southwark council leaseholder and live downstairs in a ground floor flat, there is one flat above me, it's a house with individual front doors leading from the street into the shared pathway. My neighbour told me he has had a ring doorbell installed, no discussion as to how I would feel being on camera everytime I go in and out or in my front garden. I was told it's only for deliveries and doesn't record and only activates when pressed, however I don't know this and I feel really uncomfortable everytime I'm out in garden or on doorstep talking to people. Everytime I walk in/out, it lights up and in the eve it has a  infra red  light. Now I've read up that as he said its only for deliveries, he could set it so it only activates when pressed, however it activates with its motion sensor. Had he said to me about getting it installed, I could have had the opportunity to ask about it recording etc but nothing except it's being installed and when I arrived home it was there. I don't like being horrible to people however I feel I have not been considered in his decision and I feel very uncomfortable as, some times I have to stand on doorstep to get signal for my mobile and I really don't like the idea of being watched and listened to. Has anyone got any advice as I'm beginning to get angry as I've asked about it once and was told it only activates when pressed. I believe this is not true. I know southwark council say you need to ask permission to make sure the neighbours are OK with it, I don't really want to go down that road but I don't know how to approach the subject again. They also put a shed approx 3 foot from my back room window, these places are built so my window faces their rear garden and there upstairs window  faces mine. They said it's there temporarily, that was over a year ago and it does affect the light, plus I'm hoping to sell up soon and the view from window is mainly a dark brown shed. When I've mentioned this, I was told they have no where else to put it, whereas originally they said its only temporary, Also the floorboards above are bare and I get woke early morning and at night, the thudding is so bad my light shakes and window rattles, so I mentioned this and asked if they have rugs, I was told when they get the boards re sanded they will get rugs, I should have asked if they could get rugs and just take them up when boards being done, which I would have done had it been me living above someone, their attitude was I can just put up with it until they are ready. so they had the floor boards done, and the workmen was hammering screws, yes screws, in the floorboards, I spoke to workmen to ask how much longer and they said yes, are using screws to make less noise! I could hear the cordless screwdriver, not an issue but for every screw there were at least 8 whacks, the owners had gone out to avoid the noise  so I  spoke to workmen as the noise was unbearable, the sanding, not an issue at all, people need to get things done to their home and I'm fine that on occasions there will be temporary noise. now I have a nice crack on my bedroom ceiling, I mentioned this to owner but no response, he said there were alot of loose floorboards and it will be much better now, not so noisy, as though I don't know the difference between squeaking floor boards and thudding, and nothing was mentioned re the crack or that they now have rugs, which if it were me, I'd be trying to resolve the issue so we can get on with feeling happy in our homes. so I'm feeling it's a total lack of consideration. these places are old and Edwardian and I've lived here over 40 years, had 4 different neighbours and it's only now the noise of thudding is really bad and the people before had floorboards but nothing like this. As you can probably tell I'm really wound up and I don't want to end up exploding at them, I've always got on with neighbours and always said if there's a problem with my dog, pls let me know, always tell me, however I feel it's got to the point where I say something and I'm fobbed off. I know I should tell them but I'm angry, perhaps I should write them a letter. Any suggestions greatly appreciated and thank you for reading my rant. 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...