Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Jah Lush Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> DulwichFox Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

>

> >

> > After being made redundant in 2008 and still

> > ueimployed have not claimed or indeed been told

> > intitled to a single

> > penny in benefits since.

>

> You got a nice little pay-off then.


Yes but with 0.1% interest... after 3 years ... there is not much left.

:(


Fox

DulwichFox Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------


>

> Yes but with 0.1% interest... after 3 years ...

> there is not much left.

> :(

>


xxxxxxx


0.1% ?


I know interest rates are low, but surely you could find something paying higher interest than that?!?!?!


Highest Paying Savings


I do sympathise because I took a lump sum as part of my pension and now I wish I hadn't because what's left of it is plummeting in value :-S


ETA: In the past even when I took voluntary redundancy it didn't affect my entitlement to JSA ???? The contributions - based kind, not the means-tested kind, anyway.

There's a new on-the-lash/benefits-street model being developed in Dartmouth Road ,Forest Hill.


Within easy signing-stumbling-distance of each other you've got: The "Ha-Ha" Job Centre next door to a new Pub called The Stamp (ex-postoffice) then Paddy Power, then The Wok Express and.


Over the road is Boots the chemist and The Bird-in-Hand pub.


Really, it's a Slackers Royal Flush.


There's also random street furniture, the pavement & even a "tree" for the exhausted clients to "chillax" on.



NETTE:-S

It is a touchy subject. The daily mail would have us believe that a life on benefits is somehow more cushy than for those in work. For the vast majority of people on benefits it isn't. The average payout for living expenses for a single person is just 67 quid a week. And that is for everything. Food, electric, gas, clothing etc. I defy anyone to get by like that for very long.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • I don't need you to tell me to 'fight against' racism.  I know what it looks it like, thank you.  And China would be our enemy whether we were in Europe or not (and has been for a long time), so that's immaterial.  I remember covering an EDL march 12 years ago, when there was a Cons-Lib Dem coalition, so the idea that this is a new problem is rubbish. BUT Reform is doing an excellent job of galvanising a minority in reaction to smug liberals like you, who blame the electorate's collective ignorance for all the country's demons.  What right have you for a moral mandate? 
    • Both Labour and Conservatives can remove the threat of a Reform government by making making two major policy promises. And these are .......... (1) categorically state that they will take Britain out of the ECHR and (2) Undertake to remove any new small boat arrivals to Rwanda or wherever else. Reform is basically a single issue party and adopting (1) & (2) would send Reform into obscurity. The country has had enough of our judiciary making a gold-plated interpretation of the ECHR statutes.  
    • You fight against by not pretending. By calling it what it is. Instead of slyly pretending they are not racist “actually”  recognise what the country is facing and say “no” why do you even need to ask the question?
    • How does one 'fight against...'?
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...