Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Singapore is plastic, money obsessessd and has knocked down its heritage for shopping malls, truly one of the most sterile and awful places I have visited.....but it is safe.......oh, by the way, ask all the thousands of Thai whores in Singapores multiple brothels how free and nice Singapore is.


Will never go back there again, hideous place full of western moneytraders and their eastern cpounterparts......


but it is safe.


*pukes

????, Lakeside, Bluewater, Brent X, The Glades, Bullring, Arndale, Meadowhall, Centrale, Whitgift, Whiteleys . . . I could go on. As for sex workers, there are thousands all over the UK, both indigenous and imported from Eastern Europe, South America and Asia.


So the only difference seems to be sunshine and crime?

Extract from the Singaporean Press:


In a breakthrough for American trade negotiators, Singapore recently relaxed its ban on chewing gum, imposed a dozen years ago for the sake of tidiness. Singaporeans now can lawfully buy 'medicinal' gum - including Nicorette and, on the theory that it promotes dental hygiene, Wrigley's sugar-free Orbit - but only in pharmacies, and only after showing identification. A pharmacist convicted of selling unregistered gum, the Associated Press reports, can be jailed for two years. Street cleaners are now grumbling about wads of gum defacing sidewalks and pavement.


. . . and in the UK Press:


In a breakthrough for drug dealers, the UK recently relaxed its ban of controlled drugs, imposed for the sake of protecting its citizens. People now can lawfully buy 'class A' drugs - including Heroin, Crack and Cocaine, on the theory that it promotes safer streets - but only in licenced pharmacies, and only after showing identification. A pharmacist convicted of selling unregistered Crack, can be jailed for twenty years. Special Constables are now grumbling about stoned addicts littering the sidewalks and pavement.



edited for spelling mistakes

Wahey lively debate.

I see both sides, LozzyLoz is right to counter quids' tirade by saying they're all applicable here, too right, but then quids has a point that it is indeed a sterile place that's knocked down its heritage, though there are huge amount of restoration going on in the areas that survived but rotted, such as Joo Chiat, where our own Huguenot now lives.


I didn't take to it like a duck to water, but what I sensed there was a buy-in to the social fabric, mutual respect and an absence of intolerance (I avoid saying the word tolerance as people aren't tolerating each other, it just works, the only other place I've witnessed this was Cuba).

That said the lack of political freedom does make me very uncomfortable, and the problem with benevolent dictatorship is that it doesn't take an awful lot to turn it into malevolent democracy.


Oh, and Goodfellas on TV "Fun your mop you muddy funster" was hilarious!!

Have a good trip Mockney?


I would never suggest for a moment that we emulate the Singaporean governments political straightjacket on it's people, only suggested that perhaps we try the zero tolerance drugs approach (minus death penalty (China is highest *Bob*)) which seems to work.


We have some pretty sterile places in this country too (Coventry, Portsmouth, Bradford, Docklands etc) and not much real political choice either.

When I read Mockney's description "I sensed there was a buy-in to the social fabric, mutual respect and an absence of intolerance" it was almost word-for-word the same as a description my old history lecturer used - about East Germany when he lived there.

Saying you want something like a Singaporean society minus the dictatorship and the death penalty is like saying you'd like a bag of chips minus the potatoes.

Yeah, great trip, good to see the lads again, and just nice to have a brief window of warmth and eat tonnes of great food.


I wasn't really trying to move the debate away from prohibition, but I guess I saw how the ultimate in nanny states had actually managed to achieve alot, and it was the social cohesion it achieves which troubled me most, as it's what I'm missing most about modern 'me me me' Britain.

However i guess what I'm doing is falsely attributing the latter to the former. If anything this state has become much more nannying AND managed to lose social cohesion and mutual respect.


Back on topic I by-and-large agree that prohibition really isn't working and anything which takes the power and money out of the hands of illegal criminals - see what I did there ;) - is a good thing, though I don't for a second thing it should be done lightly, and perhaps phased in kicking off with cannabis.

No *Bob*, you're reading too much into what I've said. I've never, and I thought I'd made that clear, said I wanted a Singaporean Society here. I've simply said as part of this thread on Drug Policy that perhaps a zero tolerance approach minus the death penalty could work here. This kind of approach doesn't necessitate importing all the other features of Singaporean Society.


Are you suggesting that controlled drugs should be available on the black market for recreational use and that the responsibility for taking them lies with the user? Fine for you and me but it doesn't solve the wider issue of dependency, abuse and crime does it?

lozzyloz Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Are you suggesting that controlled drugs should be

> available on the black market for recreational use

> and that the responsibility for taking them lies

> with the user?


That wouldn't be a suggestion - that would be the reality you're talking about there. And it always will be. I have no suggestions that will ever come to pass. Cannabis will probably waver around the periphery of legality - but as for the rest - forget it. Nothing will happen.

No government want be seen as 'soft on drugs' any more than it wants to criminalise several million of its electorate in one fell swoop.

The only way to have a crime free society and maintain our (western, democratic or what ever you want to call them) social and political ideals is to have a very low level of poverty and a relatively even distribution of wealth. This is why it works in place like Canada and New Zealand. Those countries still have the usual problems endemic to western society like drugs and binge drinking but there is very little violent crime and robbery.


The alternatives are: Totalitarian, iron fisted rule to impose order (like Singapore) or massive social inequalities coupled unchecked crime and violence (like South Africa).

Brendan Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> The only way to have a crime free society and maintain our (western, democratic or what ever you want to call them) social and political ideals is to have a very low level of poverty and a relatively even distribution of wealth. This is

why it works in place like Canada and New Zealand. Those countries still have the usual problems endemic to western society like drugs and binge drinking but there is very little violent crime and robbery.


I've always thought there was a lot of poverty in NZ, but that may just be because I've seen "Once were warriors" :-S

  • 2 weeks later...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • What was he doing on the stage at Glastonbury? Or on the stage at the other concert in Finsbury Park? Grinning like a Cheshire cat whilst pissed and stoned 20 somethings on the promise of free internet sung-- Oh Jeremy Corbyn---  What were his policies for Northern mining towns with no jobs or infrastructure? Free Internet and university places for youngsters. What were his other manifesto pledges? Why all the ambiguity over Brexit?  I didn't like Thatcher, Blair or May or Tony but I respected them as politicians because they stood by what they believed in. I respect all politicians across the board that stick to their principles. Corbyn didn't and its why he got  annihilated at the polls. A socialist, anti imperialist and anti capitalist that said he voted for an imperialist and pro capitalist cabal. He refused to say how he'd vote over and over again until the last knockings. He did so to appease the Islington elite and middle class students he was courting. The same people that were screaming that Brexit was racist. At the same time the EU were holding black and Asian immigrants in refugee camps overseas but not a word on that! Corbyn created and courted a student union protest movement that screamed at and shouted down anyone not on the left . They claimed Starmer and the centre right of labour were tories. He didn't get elected  because he, his movement and policies were unelectable, twice. He turned out not to have the convictions of his politics and died on his own sword.    Reform won't win an election. All the idiots that voted for them to keep out Labour actually enabled Labour. They'll be back voting tory next time.    Farage wouldn't be able to make his millions if he was in power. He's a very devious shyster but I very much doubt he'd actually want the responsibility that governance requires.
    • The purge of hard left members that were part of Corbyn's, Mcdonnel's and Lansmans momentum that purged the party of right wing and centrist members. That's politics. It's what Blair did to win, its what Starmer had to do to win. This country doesn't vote in extreme left or right governments. That's partly why Corbyn lost  We're pretty much a centrist bunch.  It doesn't make it false either. It's an opinion based on the voting patterns, demography and statistics. Can you explain then why former mining constituencies that despise the tories voted for them or abstained rather than vote for Corbyns Labour?  What is the truth then? But he never got elected!!! Why? He should have been binned off there and then. Why he was allowed to hang about is an outrage. I hold him party responsible for the shit show that we've had to endure since. 
    • Depends on what the Barista says doesnt it? There was no physical confrontation with the driver, OP thinks she is being targetted when she isnt. These guys work min wage under strict schedules so give them a break unless they damage your stuff
    • CPR Dave, attendance records are available on Southwark's website. Maggie Browning has attended 100% of meetings. Jon Hartley has attended 65%.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...