Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Is it pie in the sky to think something like this could be implemented?


I think it looks fantastic.


I've been saying, for ages, to anyone that will listen that it would be wonderful if London became a predominately cycling city- it's the fastest way to get round town and obviously the healthiest, and the more bikes that are appearing on the road, it seems the more courteous drivers are becoming (just need to make some of the cyclists more courteous now).


http://londonist.com/2012/01/london-designer-has-a-new-take-on-cycle-wayfinding.php

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/21652-london-cyclists/
Share on other sites

Nice idea, I love the little cycleways that are provided but if your not familiar with the particular route your following you can lose your way quite easily. The signs can be tiny and have on occasion just disappeared leaving me scratching my head and hopelessly bereft. Bring it on. :))

How does London become a predominantly cycling city?

What about those folk - older or those whose health predisposes them against cycling, etc etc, who simply will never be a cyclist? If people want to and can, they will.

You can lead a person to a cycle, you can't make them use it!

That's brilliant - and actually has the added advantage of being useful for pedestrians as well. One problem may be that drivers try following it too which isn't going to work so well on one-way streets that are two-way for bikes.


bon3yard - I can't tell you how often I've tried following some of the little cycle signs only to arrive at a dead end with no obvious way to go. There's one particularly good one if you're coming back from Beckenham Junction which sends you through the railway station complete with taking your bike up/down stairs to get through the underpass.

PeckhamRose Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> How does London become a predominantly cycling

> city?

> What about those folk - older or those whose

> health predisposes them against cycling, etc etc


Or how about the taxis, buses, trucks, vans, etc which I suspect make up the majority of London traffic!


Anyway, surely dangerous roads are a bigger barrier to potential cyclists than poor signage.

Absolutely. Big holes in roads, cycle friendly speed humps blocked by parked vehicles, and constantly having to take one's eyes off the road to read the many signs, does not make for sensible safe cycling or riding as recommended by advanced road use groups. Mr PR doesn't need cycle lanes and special attention, he just reads the map to work out how to get from A to B and if a particular route looks inappropriate for some reason he'll experiment on side roads. A big picture of a bicycle in a road does not make it a cycle safe lane.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Yes, these are all good points. I agree with you, that division has led us down dangerous paths in the past. And I deplore any kind of racism (as I think you probably know).  But I feel that a lot of the current wave of xenophobia we're witnessing is actually more about a general malaise and discontent. I know non-white people around here who are surprisingly vocal about immigrants - legal or otherwise. I think this feeling transcends skin colour for a lot of people and isn't as simple as, say, the Jew hatred of the 1930s or the Irish and Black racism that we saw laterally. I think people feel ignored and looked down upon.  What you don't realise, Sephiroth, is that I actually agree with a lot of what you're saying. I just think that looking down on people because of their voting history and opinions is self-defeating. And that's where Labour's getting it wrong and Reform is reaping the rewards.   
    • @Sephiroth you made some interesting points on the economy, on the Lammy thread. Thought it worth broadening the discussion. Reeves (irrespective of her financial competence) clearly was too downbeat on things when Labour came into power. But could there have been more honesty on the liklihood of taxes going up (which they have done, and will do in any case due to the freezing of personal allowances).  It may have been a silly commitment not to do this, but were you damned if you do and damned if you don't?
    • I'd quit this thread, let those who just want to slag Labour off have their own thread.  Your views on the economy are worth debating.  I'm just stunned how there wasn't this level of noise with the last government.  I could try to get some dirt on Badenoch but she is pointless  Whilst I am not a fan of the Daily Mirror at least there is some respite from Labour bashing. https://www.mirror.co.uk/news/politics/grenfell-hillsborough-families-make-powerful-36175862 https://www.mirror.co.uk/news/politics/nigel-farage-facing-parliamentary-investigation-36188612  
    • That is a bit cake and eat it tho, isn’t it?    At what point do we stop respecting other people’s opinions and beliefs  because history shows us we sometimes simply have no other choice  you are holding some comfort blanket that allows you to believe we are all equal and all valid and we can simply voice different options - without that ever  impacting on the real world  Were the racists we fought in previous generations different? Were their beliefs patronised by the elites of the time? Or do we learn lessons and avoid mistakes of the past?   racists/bigots having “just as much to say” is both true and yet, a thing we have learnt from the past. The lesson was not “ooh let’s hear them out. They sound interesting and valid and as worthy of an audience as people who hold the opposite opinion” 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...