Jump to content

Recommended Posts

http://www.paigntonpeople.co.uk/Follow-example-parking-charges/story-15108697-detail/story.html


Winge not East Dulwichians we are praised from afar !


I AM sure our councillors are all very nice individuals, but seem to have a collective 'head in the sand' mentality where parking meters are concerned.


Why is it they cannot see what we ordinary folk see, the town is dead because of parking meters and parking charges, yet they want to flood the town with more.


May I respectfully suggest they take a trip (not First Class) to East Dulwich, a very busy town in London where there are no parking meters and no empty shops?


There are a couple of parking attendants who patrol the streets advising people of the restrictions (bus lanes etc), and during many visits it seems few if any disregard these restrictions, or time limits displayed.


In the evenings after 6pm, and on Sundays, there are no restrictions at all. The place is buzzing day and night.


Alternatively, take a trip to North Allerton in Yorkshire, again no parking meters.


You obtain a paper clock, available in most shops, and display the time of arrival which allows you two hours' free parking.


If you are over the two hours then a warden can issue a ticket, but mostly it's 'a word in your ear'.


There are cheap car parks if you need more than two hours.


Again, no empty shops. The same system is used in most busy towns in Yorkshire and also Wiltshire.


In the aforementioned towns not only do the shops benefit, but the cafes and restaurants too as the shoppers delay their departure until rush hour is over.


Our traffic enforcers in Torquay seem to have standard issue stopwatches, woe betide you if you are a couple of minutes over the time paid for, a ticket is slapped on your screen.


My neighbour was six minutes over, his friend the day before four minutes over, all because they were caught in the slow queue at the bank or shop.


All the grand plans and bypass schemes for Torquay will come to nought if our councillors continue to follow this suicidal parking policy.


All those intended cruise ship passengers will be able to tell their friends about all those lovely empty beaches in Torbay.


I would respectfully suggest that our councillors remove their revenue raising blinkers, try cancelling all parking meter charges for two years, or alternatively charge 10p for two hours, so our enforcers know how long a car has been parked.


They may be surprised that the rates from the once-empty shops will outweigh the revenue earned from the parking meters.


If there are no feet on the streets then the town will die, can they not hear the death rattle? We ordinary folk can.


Ivan Cloherty


Lisburne Square


Torquay

Councillors like money

And they are supported by a small number of anti-car luddites who seem to think everyone else shares their smug 'idealism' and that parking restrictions mean no change for people from outside SE22 (say SE21, SE24, SE5) who will happily jump on a bus/train to pop down for some nick/nacks, foodies stuff or a beer/wine on the weekend.


It'll ruin SE22 as it has plenty of other places - many independent businesses here are on wafer thin margins and finding it tough enough in the recssion. Parking restriction evangicals FIGHT them, they are idiots.

eddie Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I wonder if I can get someone to take the rap for

> my parking tickets, you know, like the Liberal

> Democrat MP who appears to have had his wife take

> his points for speeding? Oh well, perhaps not.


He's not the first and he won't be the last. It's not exactly difficult (provided your dopey ex-wife can keep her mouth shut).

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Per Cllr McAsh, as quoted above: “We are currently updating our Enforcement Policy and changes will allow for the issuing of civil penalties ranging from £175 to £300 for visible smoke emissions, replacing the previous reliance on criminal prosecution. " Is anyone au fait with the Clean Air Act 1993, and  particularly with the state of 'Smoke Control' law and practice generally?  I've just been looking  through some of it for the first time and, afaics, the civil penalties mentioned  were introduced into the Clean Air Act, at Schedule 1A, in May 2022.  So it seems that, in this particular,  it's a matter of the enforcement policy trailing well behind the legislation.  I'm not criticising that at all, but am curious.  
    • Here's the part of march46's linked-to Southwark News article pertaining to Southwark Council. "Southwark Council were also contacted for a response. "Councillor James McAsh, Cabinet Member for Clean Air, Streets & Waste said: “One of Southwark’s key priorities is to create a healthy environment for our residents. “To achieve this we closely monitor legislation and measures that influence air pollution – our entire borough apart from inland waterways is designated as a Smoke Control Area, and we also offer substantial provision for electric vehicles to promote alternative fuel travel options and our Streets for People strategy. “We as a council support the work of Mums for Lungs and recognise the health and environmental impacts of domestic solid fuel burning, particularly from wood-burning appliances. “We are currently updating our Enforcement Policy and changes will allow for the issuing of civil penalties ranging from £175 to £300 for visible smoke emissions, replacing the previous reliance on criminal prosecution.  “This work is being undertaken in collaboration with other London boroughs as part of the pan-London Wood Burning Project, which aims to harmonise enforcement approaches and share best practice across the capital.” ETA: And here's a post I made a few years ago, with tangential relevance.  https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/278140-early-morning-drone-flying/?do=findComment&comment=1493274  
    • The solicitor is also the Executor. Big mistake, but my Aunt was very old, and this was the Covid years and shortly after so impossible to intervene and get a couple of close relatives to do this.  She had no children so this is the nephews and nieces. He is a single practitioner, and most at his age would have long since retired - there is a question over his competence Two letters have already gone essentially complaining - batted off and 'amusingly' one put the blame on us. There are five on our side, all speaking to each other, and ideally would work as a single point of contact.  But he has said that this is not allowed - we've all given approval to act on each others behalf. There are five on her late husband's side, who have not engaged with us despite the suggestion to work as a team, There is one other, who get's the lion's share, the typicical 'friend', but we are long since challenging the will. I would like to put another complaint together that he has not used modern collective communication (I expect that he is incapable) which had seriously delayed the execution of the will.   I know many in their 80s very adept with smart phones so that is not an ageist comment. The house has deteriorated very badly, with cold, damp and a serious leak.  PM me if you want to see the dreadful condition that it is now in. I would also question why if the five of us are happy to work together why all of us need to confirm in writing.             The house was lived in until Feb 23, and has been allowed to get like this.
    • Isn’t a five yearly electricity safety certificate one of the things the landlord must give for a legal tenancy?
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...