Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Ok - I'm not a natural domestic goddess (this is an understatement!). But in an effort to make a plate of gooey, moist, yummy brownies that I can be proud to plonk on the PTA cake sale table (as opposed to sneak on the table without anyone seeing!), I have been experimenting with different receipes with my son (who have been inspired by the Junior Bakeoff series on CBBC). I have found the perfect brownie receipe (in the Moosewood Cookbook (American) if you'd like to try it) which ensures brownies are properly gooey and moist! The first time I made it, it was perfect! But last weekend, it sunk significantly in the middle! Any ideas why? I think maybe I put in too much vegetable oil (this receipe we don't use butter) Or could it be something to do with the oven?

That's the whole mystery of baking...sometimes they come out perfect and other times they don't. I for one, having followed the same recipe exactly, have countless times come up with what you could actually say are completely different items...


Sorry couldn't help, but I did want to say that it's really sweet that you bake with your son! I can't wait to do that one day myself (mine is not even a year old yet).

Yes, he loves to bake!!!!


Have googled this question and it looks like the oven temp might have been too high. I also might have put the tray to high in the oven.


I guess I'll try again this weekend and see what comes out of the oven - perfect brownie or sunken brownie! Whatever happens, there will be more gooey brownies to make and consume!!

Yes, I also thought the problem might be oven temp. Get a thermometer to check your oven. Brownies need an exact and very consistent temp. And don't open the oven while baking. If you absolutely must open the even to check, let at least 3/4 of your total baking time have passed before you do so.


Otherwise, what are you using for levening? Double check that everything is within its 'use by' date, and let the mixture come to room temp before placing in the oven.


If your brownies fell in the middle and didn't look as nice as you wanted, try icing them with mascarpone to even-up the surface, then dust with cinnamon, cocoa powder, confectioners sugar. xx

Ahhhh... now it's making sense! I did open the oven door to check them and also because I use an American receipe ( I am from North America myself)they didn't have the translation to the gas mark and I hadn't checked it again on google & assumed my memory from last time was correct. So I checked them half way through and realising they weren't baking well, I just bunged the temp up to what it should be! It sounds silly but it didn't occur to me it would matter but now you point out about the need for a consistent and even temp it's no wonder they sunk!!! They still were tasty though!


Thanks for the advice!! And in case anyone wonders the secret to gooey moist brownies is 1/4 cup golden syrup and 1/4 cup aPplesauce.

Haven't tried this personally, but it looks helpful. It's an online calculator for converting from conventional to convection (fan) oven:

http://convection-calculator.com/


Ah but you still have to do the conversion from F to C... see here: http://onlineconversion.com/

Or more specifically here... http://onlineconversion.com/cooking.htm

  • 3 weeks later...
Well, I made a fairly successful batch of brownies for tomorrows Goose Green PTA cake sale - thanks to all the advice I received here on the forum! I made sure that we didn't put in too much baking powder, I banged the tray (and sure enough, some air bubbles came to the surface) and I resisted the temptation to open the oven door before time. There was alittle sinking in the middle but not much! They are very, very moist and very gooey! (I think my boy got carried away when measuring out the applesauce!). YUM!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Work such as dry rot treatment will have a guarantee.  Major works as such are more general and I've not seen guarantees on any I've had done. You need to find the source of the damp and the cause of it and be able to demonstrate that it's down to the works that have been done.
    • Thanks for all of the thoughts. I have a letter from searches which outlines the scope of work but doesn't mention any work guarantee as far as I can see. I agree that next step is to check directly with the major works team. Tim .
    • I thoroughly recommend Jay from JK Electrical Contractors who is an NICEIC registered. NICEIC is the UK's leading certification body for the electrical contracting industry and conducts regular audits and assessments on all its members. It is the specialist trade body which certifies professional electricians.  Jay completed the installation of a 19 way consumer unit for us and works to the highest standards and our entire electrical installation is now fully compliant with 18th Edition of the electrical wiring regulations. Before installing the new CU he traced and corrected faults that had developed over the last 25 years -some of which were my DIY bodges that were non-compliant.  We now have an installation that is 100% safe and  reliable . His contact details are :- 0208 150 6450 info@jkec.net Here is what he installed for us.
    • I fully support this petition, however it will need to be shared far & wide to be effective. Also there is always a huge amount of interest / objection during the festival, but not so much when they start consulting for the next one, usually around January. It's crucial that everyone that has been impacted makes their voice heard then.  A couple of points which may be good to include in the wording (if it is still possible to amend?) - The total tickets sold are way more than 3000. The licence allows a capacity of up to 9,999, but this may include staff & performers etc. The published attendance for 2024 was:  Friday – 8,999 / Saturday – 9,512 / Sunday – 9,422 So that's c.28,000 people trampling & littering our park over three days - people who have no need or desire to take any care or consideration of our park.  - Gala claim for 2024 that "62% of all ticket holders were from Southeast London and 18% of these were from hyper-local postcode areas SE15 and SE22." So a bit of maths shows that means that around 89% of attendees were not what most people would term 'local'... - Gala have ambitions / plans to extend the number of event days to 6, over two weekends. They applied for a licence for this in 2024, but then withdrew it. Instead they added a "free" event, billed as a community day, to the existing 3 day festival, thereby increasing the event days to 4.  This would appear to be an attempt to set a precedent for increasing the number of event days, and it's inevitable that they will attempt to secure the 6 days they desire for 2026, to increase their profits further. Two weekends in a row of noise, disturbance & disruption would be unacceptable, plus an extra c.18,000 trampling & littering the park... - The site size has been increased. The claim is that it is to compensate for lost storage space due to recent flood alleviation works, but the area has increased by more than the area lost, and appears to have been used for attendee activity rather than site storage. Gala have often stated that the festival can only be located in the park because the footprint has been designed specifically for that area, and yet this year the footprint had been amended & extended without any apparent issues. Surely this proves that it could be relocated?  Apologies, I just can't help going into rant mode on this issue, but hopefully some of the above may be helpful in increasing the argument presented by the petition?
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...