Jump to content

Recommended Posts

have just returned from walking the doggies in peckham rye park. damage by staff type dogs to the trees has reached horrendous proportions and we are now certain to lose many nice examples. bark has been stripped from the base of many trees and it may now be impossible to save them. park authorities really must start a programme of protective guards around the trees. I know cash is tight, but do we really have to write off our beloved trees? come on councillors. time to get cracking.
Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/21861-tree-damage-in-park/
Share on other sites

davidh Wrote: how the hell do you know that it is caused by staffy type dogs, do sit and spy on dog walkers? Makes you sound a bit weird if I'm honest. Maybe we should all get a Dalmation or some other piney dog

-------------------------------------------------------

> have just returned from walking the doggies in

> peckham rye park. damage by staff type dogs to the

> trees has reached horrendous proportions and we

> are now certain to lose many nice examples. bark

> has been stripped from the base of many trees and

> it may now be impossible to save them. park

> authorities really must start a programme of

> protective guards around the trees. I know cash is

> tight, but do we really have to write off our

> beloved trees? come on councillors. time to get

> cracking.

If it is damage by dogs surely the owners of the dogs should take responsibility not the park/ council. It is another waste of tax payers money that dog owners are unable to look after what they own.


The alternative is to ban dogs from the parks and at the same time to ban them from the streets which would save the cost of cleaning up after them.


Alternatively why not reintroduce dog licences at say ?500 a year, you then have the choise between dog ownership or not.


Everything else is taxed so why not another thing.

James it could be that the 'anti bite' foul-tasting ingredient is not effective, especially if the dog is being worked up and encouraged to bite at the trees. A cage might be better. Anyone that sees dogs doing this should report it to the park warden immediately.


Anyhow, it is the owners that need to be caught and dealt with- antisocial behaviour in its myriad forms is a problem for us all. Of course, in some cases the trees are just ripped at by people sans dog, I've seen young males doing this in the park. The regular grafitti damage to the Japanese summerhouse is a pain, but at least the bowling pavilion has not been burned down again. However, a couple of years back vandals did set fire to some trees on the Rye.


What was it you were saying about banning those causing damage from the park and streets grumpy?

grumpyoldman Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> If it is damage by dogs surely the owners of the

> dogs should take responsibility not the park/

> council. It is another waste of tax payers money

> that dog owners are unable to look after what they

> own.

>

> The alternative is to ban dogs from the parks and

> at the same time to ban them from the streets

> which would save the cost of cleaning up after

> them.

>

> Alternatively why not reintroduce dog licences at

> say ?500 a year, you then have the choise between

> dog ownership or not.

>

> Everything else is taxed so why not another thing.



If dog licences were introduced the type of dog owners that allow their dogs to chew and damage trees wouldn't pay for a licence for their dog you can guarantee that. It would be impossible to enforce it aswell!


As for saying an alternative is to ban dogs from parks and streets I do hope you were joking!

nununoolio Ha ha ha idiot

-------------------------------------------------------

> The owner of the Staffie (Not so weird now

> Lishyloo)that had been biting the trees was

> stopped and cautioned by the park warden on

> Sunday. Too late to save several trees, which have

> been badly damaged, but hopefully these attacks

> will no longer happen

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • I have a warning from EE that they're undertaking work locally to me, I'm assuming the south end of Underhill, over the next 5 days so there may be a temporary reduction in service. Otherwise it's fine. In case you suddenly hear adverse comments, problems may only be short lived. 
    • For those of us in Forest Hill this is great news.  As well as a better connection to Clapham, a quicker route to Catford is very welcome, as we often use Catford stations a lot for the Thameslink and to go down to Bromley and Beckenham. A stop in Brixton would be welcome.  Yes we have the P4.  But have you ever used the P4?
    • Sophie, I have to thank you for bringing me squarely into 2025.  I was aware of 4G/5G USB dongles for single computers, and of being able to use smartphones for tethering 4G/5G, but hadn't realised that the four mobile networks were now providing home hub/routers, effectively mimicking the cabled broadband suppliers.  I'd personally stick to calling the mobile networks 4G/5G rather than wifi, so as not to confuse them with the wifi that we use within home or from external wifi hotspots. 4G/5G is a whole diffferent, wide-area set of  networks, and uses its own distinct wavebands. So, when you're saying wi-fi, I assume you're actually referring to the wide-area networks, and that it's not a matter of just having poor connections within your home local area network, or a router which is deficient.   If any doubt, the best test will be with a computer connected directly to the router by cable; possibly  trying different locations as well. Which really leaves me with only one maybe useful thing to say.  :) The Which pages at https://www.which.co.uk/reviews/broadband/article/what-is-broadband/what-is-4g-broadband-aUWwk1O9J0cW look pretty useful and informative. They include local area quality of coverage maps for the four providers (including 5G user reports I think) , where they say (and I guess it too is pretty common knowledge): Our survey of the best and worst UK mobile networks found that the most common issues mobile customers have are constantly poor phone signal and continuous brief network dropouts – and in fact no network in our survey received a five star rating for network reliability. 
    • 5G has a shorter range and is worse at penetrating obstacles between you and the cell tower, try logging into the router and knocking it back to 4G (LTE) You also need to establish if the problem is WiFi or cellular. Change the WiFi from 5GHz to 2.4GHz and you will get better WiFi coverage within your house If your WiFi is fine and moving to 4G doesn't help then you might be in a dead spot. There's lots of fibre deployed in East Dulwich
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...