Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Anyhoo, let us once again to Star Trek. The split infinite never bothered me too much. I just assumed they forgot to put the commas in. What bothers me is the concept of, ?Space - the final frontier.?


A frontier is the area where your stuff ends and another bit of stuff starts. You can always push further into the other stuff (as long as the UN doesn?t stop you) and then you will have another frontier. So a frontier isn?t final unless nothing exists on the other side of it.


Now this is possibly true of space, if you mean the sort of existence-balloon of space-time that houses our reality. Perhaps nothing exists outside of this but perhaps something does and we just aren?t able to perceive it.


Which is all very well but it is as much a final frontier to someone sitting in a barrel of pilchards in 18th century Ipswich as it is to people in matching pyjamas in a spaceship in the far-flung future.


Trouble is I don?t think that is what they meant at all. I think they were talking about the places outside of the earth?s atmosphere that you have to wear pyjamas and ride a spaceship to visit. Like Saturn and Hollywood. There may be new frontiers out there but final ones?


Well maybe if you suddenly come up against the end of space like a big wall. But that doesn?t exist apparently. It?s all supposed to sort of fold in on itself.


Isn?t it?


Or have the men in white coats and old jumpers changed their minds again?

Today's Evening Standard have picked up our baton.


The hitherto unbeknownst-to-me-but-now-love-of-my-imaginary-life Rosamund Urwin criticises both prospective mayoral candidate Ken Livingstone for:


"Watch out! There's less police about"


in a campaign poster - all those with O-Level English will know that "police" is a count noun and should therefore should be prefixed with "fewer" (I recently read that a supermarket has changed it's aisle posters but can't remember which one) - and she also knocks Prime Minister David Cameron for insisting:


"...on saying 'try and' whenever he speaks. An Eton education apparently isn't enough to impart the information that this sense of 'try' is followed by an infinitive."


She also admits to being a "young fogey" and reading Simon Heffer's Strictly English on holiday. I think I might be in love.

reading her biog I pity your alter ego and his misguided crush


"Rosamund is a reporter on the City desk with a fashion obsession. It has regularly been noted that this combination makes her a real-life Rebecca Bloomwood from Confessions of a Shopaholic, although she hopes with more financial savvy and better taste in clothes."


Especially given the fallaciousness "taht[sic] this sense of 'try' is followed by an infinitive."


Standards of journalism these days eh! *she is rather pretty though I'll grant you*

Hugo,

H said

------------------------------

People get confused about dyslexia (unwitting pun) - it's not about spelling problems, and those spelling problems which are created are usually quite specific, not general grammatical rules.


True dyslexia is much broader than simply confusing or transposing letters, for example mistaking ?b? and ?d.".


In general, symptoms of DRD may include:


- Difficulty determining the meaning (idea content) of a simple sentence


- Difficulty learning to recognize written words


- Difficulty rhyming


What's your source for that info? I'd always thought,perhaps erroneously, that dyslexia was an umbrella term that covered a range of things, and that most involve problems with memory processing. In this way problems with category, especially that sound the same- two/too/to- might arise as a result of dyselxia.

I've no doubt that they could first mate. My point was more that these would be part of a significant portfolio of problems.


Not being able or willing to spell correctly is not the definition of dyslexia. Having worked so closely with someone who genuinely suffered from dyslexia I generously get offended on his behalf when idle ingrates claim that they're dyslexic as a get out of jail free card.


That definition of dyslexia was from one of the big medical associations, but I forget which.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Just catching up on some of this thread. My own view is that the BBC clearly misquoted Trump in a programme that broadly gave an accurate account of what happened on January 6th - that he inspired the attack on the Capitol. His speech did repeatedly call on people to fight. He repeatedly claimed that the election had been stolen, and continues to repeat this lie. He has since pardoned many of those involved in that violence. The 'journalist' at the Telegraph who 'broke' this a story, more than a year after the Panorama documentary aired, also misquoted Trump's speech and gave a false impression of what was actually said. In both the case of the BBC and the Telegraph, the editing was misleading and sloppy. Trump used the term "fight" twenty time, and the term "peacefully" just once. During Trump's speech, his supporters chanted "Take the Capitol", "Invade the Capitol", "Storm the Capitol" and "Fight for Trump". In my opinion, the editing of the speech by the Telegraph is actually more misleading. The jist of the speech was not one calling for calm, but one calling for supporters to "...fight. We fight like Hell and if you don't fight like Hell, you're not going to have a country anymore. The Telegraph have not acknowledged their misleading editing / misquote of course. Trump has escaped punishment for his role in a violent insurrection. Many of the rioters who stormed the Capital have been let off / pardoned. The only people to have taken responsibility for anything, or to have faced any consequences for their behaviour, are the BBC. Both the BBC Director General and the News CEO have lost their jobs. They also face a1 billion dollar law suit from a corrupt, criminal, President (an unprecedented and outrageous act from the apparent 'defender of free speech / the free world'). The idea that the BBC's errors are being 'swept under the carpet is ridiculous'. It is very clear that there the Telegraph would love to end the BBC. For Trump to be suing any media organisation as the sitting president of the United states, (let along a publicly owned UK broadcaster - effectively, the British taxpayer) is outrageous. That the whole country isn't telling him where to go, does shoe a distinct lack of patriotism in my opinion. 
    • Trying to get to the bottom of the confusion. The events team email, the council website and the letter we all got through the door, says the consultations are this evening. I went along yesterday because it looks as though word of mouth had sent some people there on the wrong day (myself included). So not an error by the council on the date, but definitely a problem in letting people register their interest in attending. Hopefully that clears things up.
    • The ‘tree people’ conjures up a very Tolkienesque image.
    • I am hoping to find Furniture Risers, 4" or above. Needed to raise a bed and a sofa.  If you have any that you no longer need / wish to sell, please contact me by PM. Thank you  
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...