Racing car bed for child aged 3-7 years

By Alicat
March 10, 2019 in For Sale & Items Offered

Recommended Posts

Alicat

Posted March 10, 2019

- Share

Posted March 10, 2019

Sadly our son has outgrown his racing car bed which he has really enjoyed and he has been reluctant to give up. Amazingly it's still in great condition. Ideal for a child aged about 3-7 years (depending on their height, our son has suddenly shot up and is quite tall for his age) he's outgrown it at age 7.

The bed measures approx. 186 x 76 cm and takes a 140cm x 70cm mattress. Selling with the mattress if you would like it, but easy to replace if you would prefer to buy your own.

It's perfect for toddlers as it has high sides so they can't fall out and it's low to the ground so easy to get in and out. It would make a fun birthday or big bed present. Selling for ?50 ONO.

Link to comment

https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/220226-racing-car-bed-for-child-aged-3-7-years/

Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

Advertise Here
Latest Discussions
- Rude Evri delivery in SE22
  
  By maddison · Posted 4 minutes ago
  
  Depends on what the Barista says doesnt it? There was no physical confrontation with the driver, OP thinks she is being targetted when she isnt. These guys work min wage under strict schedules so give them a break unless they damage your stuff
- Councillor Jon Hartley
  
  By MaryT · Posted 1 hour ago
  
  CPR Dave, attendance records are available on Southwark's website. Maggie Browning has attended 100% of meetings. Jon Hartley has attended 65%.
- Cllr Williams to stand down
  
  By jazzer · Posted 1 hour ago
  
  I do hope NOT, wouldn't trust Farage as far as I could throw him, Starmer & co. He's backed by GB News which focus's predominantly on immigration while the BBC focus predominantly on the Israel - Gazza conflict.
- Cllr Williams to stand down
  
  By Dogkennelhillbilly · Posted 1 hour ago
  
  Everyone gets the point that Corbynites try to make with the "total number of votes cast" statistic, it's just a specious one. In 2017, Corbyn's Labour got fewer votes than May's Tories (both the percentage of votes and aggregate number of votes). In 2019, Corbyn's Labour fewer votes than Johnson's Tories (both the percentage of votes and aggregate number of votes); and he managed to drop 2.7 million votes or 6.9% of vote share between the two elections. I repeat, he got trounced by Boris F***ing Johnson and the Tories after the Brexit omnishambles. It is not true that a "fairer" electoral system would have seen Labour beat the Tories: Labour simply got fewer votes than the Tories. Corbyn lost twice. There is no metric by which he won the general election. His failure to win was a disaster for the UK, and let Johnson and Truss and Sunak into office. Corbynites have to let go of this delusion that Corbyn but really won somehow if you squint in a certain way. It is completely irrelevant that Labour under Corbyn got more votes than Labour under Starmer. It is like saying Hull City was more successful in its 2014 FA Cup Final than Chelsea was in its 2018 FA Cup Final, because Hull scored 2 goals when Chelsea only scored 1. But guess what - Chelsea won its game and Hull City lost. Corbyn's fans turned out to vote for him - but an even larger group of people who found him repellant were motivated enough to show up and vote Tory.

Sign In