Jump to content

Recommended Posts

My daughter lives in Kent...I know not local to ED....

Yesterday she took her cat to the vets, it has kidney failure. The vet told her to bring it back today, treated as necessary,and sent her on her way.

Last night her cat collapsed. The emergency vet wanted to charge ?148 to put the cat to sleep. How humane is that? What if a poor animal was run over and the owner couldnt afford the vet bill? Would it have to suffer until the next day when the bill would be ?100 cheaper??? Before you ask she can afford it and isnt on a low income so doesnt qualify for free treatment. However,should this be questioned if an animal is dying?

Stepping down from soapbox now grrrrrrrrrrrr........

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/2203-gonna-have-a-moan/
Share on other sites

I'm really sorry to hear about your cat.


Have you tried looking for a local Blue Cross centre or something similar?


Losing a cat really is losing a member of the family so my heart goes out to you.


We had a wonderful cat who lived for 24 years who passed away peacefully under her favourite spot under the radiator on Christmas day a few years ago, terrible to lose a cat at this time of the year.


I'll chip in to buy a brick for spade, maybe we can take it in turns?

Well you lot are just insensitive bastards.

This is such a sad story.

I am so sorry to read it.

I do not know why so much money was charged.

When our cat was dying we called in Mr Lomax (that place has "gone to the dogs" since he retired, for sure) who charged us just ?50 to come round to our flat and put my cat to sleep in my arms.

I absolutely can not understand why these vets can get away with charging so much money.

My heart goes out to you and specially your daughter.

Lilolil I've had many similar experiences with normal vets and emergency ones in the past - last one being poor Gus, back in June. He was a young cat (only 3yrs old) and had a growth in his intestines. We took him to the vets, who took lots of tests including numerous x-rays. We colleted him the same day, they called us back the following day and advised he needed an operation to remove the growth which also meant he would have to stay at the vets the whole weekend. He came back in a really sorry state - the nurses hadnt really looked after him properly. Things were beginning to look positive and he was even beginning to run around like his usual loonytoon self but a few days later the vet called to say it was cancer and had spread so we had to have him put down.
As well as is being incredibly heart breaking it was a very expensive time. At no point were we asked whether we could afford everything, whether we had insurance and whether it was wot we wanted (u assume the vet knows wot theyre talking about). It seemed that they were using Gus to try out new procedures and tests instead of being realistic - growths in the intestines r serious things!

trying to post rest of my comment...


Now I'm not suggesting the vets were being mean money grabbing so and sos and I loved my Gus to bits but for the end result wot a waste of money in between.I think sometimes vets avoid making the "decision" for you and assume you are wanting to prolong ur pets life for as long as possible too - my mum knew a woman who had a cat who was very old, had no teeth, deaf, blind, incontinent, and couldnt walk.

She carried it around everywhere and had to bath it daily (for obvious reasons) but wouldnt do the kindest and decent thing (for the cat)and put it down.I could continue with my list of examples.. it's a shame some vets (not all) dont just tell it how it really is.


wots wiv that word man!

Hello!

Thanks for your kind posts had a similar experience with Lomax years ago.When he first moved in back in the 1960's, we had the shop next door. He was always very kind, and when our moggie became very ill, he put her to sleep free of charge. Likewise with a kitten I found that was badly deformed.

I dont expect free treatment but to pay a fair price. ?148 is extreme and not justified.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • The current wave of xenophobia is due to powerful/influential people stirring up hatred.  It;'s what happened in the past, think 1930s Germany.  It seems to be even easier now as so many get their information from social media, whether it is right or wrong.  The media seeking so called balance will bring some nutter on, they don't then bring a nutter on to counteract that. They now seem to turn to Reform at the first opportunity. So your life is 'shite', let;s blame someone else.  Whilst sounding a bit like a Tory, taking some ownership/personal responsibility would be a start.  There are some situations where that may be more challenging, in deindustrialised 'left behind' wasteland we can't all get on our bikes and find work.  But I loathe how it is now popular to blame those of us from relatively modest backgrounds, like me, who did see education and knowledge as a way to self improve. Now we are seen by some as smug liberals......  
    • Kwik Fit buggered up an A/C leak diagnosis for me (saying there wasn't one, when there was) and sold a regas. The vehicle had to be taken to an A/C specialist for condensor replacement and a further regas. Not impressed.
    • Yes, these are all good points. I agree with you, that division has led us down dangerous paths in the past. And I deplore any kind of racism (as I think you probably know).  But I feel that a lot of the current wave of xenophobia we're witnessing is actually more about a general malaise and discontent. I know non-white people around here who are surprisingly vocal about immigrants - legal or otherwise. I think this feeling transcends skin colour for a lot of people and isn't as simple as, say, the Jew hatred of the 1930s or the Irish and Black racism that we saw laterally. I think people feel ignored and looked down upon.  What you don't realise, Sephiroth, is that I actually agree with a lot of what you're saying. I just think that looking down on people because of their voting history and opinions is self-defeating. And that's where Labour's getting it wrong and Reform is reaping the rewards.   
    • @Sephiroth you made some interesting points on the economy, on the Lammy thread. Thought it worth broadening the discussion. Reeves (irrespective of her financial competence) clearly was too downbeat on things when Labour came into power. But could there have been more honesty on the liklihood of taxes going up (which they have done, and will do in any case due to the freezing of personal allowances).  It may have been a silly commitment not to do this, but were you damned if you do and damned if you don't?
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...