Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Mick Mac Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Sue. Whether something is cheap is nothing to do

> with what you are earning. Your gigs are arguably

> more expensive than the hockney exhibition. It's

> to do with what you get for your pound, not how

> many pounds you have got.


XXXXXXXXXXXXXx


Eh? No my gigs are not "more expensive"!


They are ?11/7 advance, ?12/8 on the door.


How is that more expensive than ?15?


Somebody help me out here, am I being very thick?


How do you define "cheap"??


ETA: Defintion of Cheap

Maybe you and Dave Hockers could do a trade


You give him one and he gives you one in return (like Brixton bricks)


That way no cash changes hands and you're both satisfied by the experience


I'm sure he'd be right up for a night of 'Goosing' with you Sue.


Never know, he might bring his brushes and give your front entrance a fresh lick over.



Nette:-S

Sue Wrote:



> Eh? No my gigs are not "more expensive"!


> They are ?11/7 advance, ?12/8 on the door.


> How is that more expensive than ?15?


> Somebody help me out here, am I being very thick?

>

> How do you define "cheap"??

>

> ETA: Defintion of Cheap


Actually Sue, your gigs are more expensive than the Hockney gig for those on low incomes. The Royal Academy has a range of entrance fees. ?15 is full price but, for example, ?6.50 (income support & jobseekers allowance); ?10.50 (student); ?5 (aged 12 to 18); and so on.


My maths isn't the best but that looks like over 50% discount for those on income support, which compares well to your 33%.


For those who can afford ?15 then I think it's cheap at the price but for those who can't then there are other options.

giggirl Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Sue Wrote:

>

>

> > Eh? No my gigs are not "more expensive"!

>

> > They are ?11/7 advance, ?12/8 on the door.

>

> > How is that more expensive than ?15?

>

> > Somebody help me out here, am I being very

> thick?

> >

> > How do you define "cheap"??

> >

> > ETA: Defintion of Cheap

>

> Actually Sue, your gigs are more expensive than

> the Hockney gig for those on low incomes. The

> Royal Academy has a range of entrance fees. ?15

> is full price but, for example, ?6.50 (income

> support & jobseekers allowance); ?10.50 (student);

> ?5 (aged 12 to 18); and so on.

>

> My maths isn't the best but that looks like over

> 50% discount for those on income support, which

> compares well to your 33%.

>

> For those who can afford ?15 then I think it's

> cheap at the price but for those who can't then

> there are other options.


xxxxxxx


I had no idea the Royal Academy did concessions, as nobody had mentioned it :)


And yes, their concessionary price for people on income support is a bigger discount than ours (but then I guess they have rather more of a financial buffer than we do :)) )


We keep our concession simple by just having one price, which is for anybody who is unwaged ie not in paid employment.


But my point that to a lot of people ?15 isn't "cheap" isn't affected by the fact that concessions are available, as that comment had nothing to do with the Royal Academy prices per se.

Relatively low in cost; inexpensive or comparatively inexpensive


Sue. The definition you referred me to is above. The important words are relatively and comparatively. It's not how much money that's important, but how it compares to other services or products being offered. A price can't be viewed in isolation in determining whether it is cheap or not.


But if we don't agree that is fine. I recognise that ?15 can be considered expensive too.

red devil Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Bring back bartering...I reckon the Hockney ticket

> is worth at least a goat and a dozen eggs



Ooh, can I have mine as an omelette?


http://t3.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcRIl8nsDltpTKoFqm5f6kL1Ga7GCjIronuqsYFtdKNCKqM884ps

I decided to buy a friends ticket with my christmas money - its ?100- you can go the exhibition as many times as you like with a guest at no additional cost.There are several exhibitions in a year- if you go enough times in a year with enough people- especially if a friend buys a similar for the tate etc- its good value for money.

I made it to the Royal Academy for the Hockney this week and I wouldn't have missed it.


I agree with what someone said before; that it could have done with a bit more editing; but I enjoyed most of it. I could have done without the Sermon on the Mount; it didn't look like it belonged with the rest of the work. The Yorkshire landscapes were inspirational and you could see them evolving from the ipad to the sketches to the oils. I wasn't expecting to see the earlier work but there were a couple of pieces from the Grand Canyon which were magnificent. This doesn't do them justice, but here goes:


http://www.hockneypictures.com/home.php


I was very impressed with the Academy for not packing people in. Given that it's been so popular they could have shoe-horned more punters in, making it an unpleasant experience for all concerned, but they didn't do that. They've extended the opening hours instead, so it is a comfortable experience and you don't feel like wherever you stand you're in somebody's way.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • The current wave of xenophobia is due to powerful/influential people stirring up hatred.  It;'s what happened in the past, think 1930s Germany.  It seems to be even easier now as so many get their information from social media, whether it is right or wrong.  The media seeking so called balance will bring some nutter on, they don't then bring a nutter on to counteract that. They now seem to turn to Reform at the first opportunity. So your life is 'shite', let;s blame someone else.  Whilst sounding a bit like a Tory, taking some ownership/personal responsibility would be a start.  There are some situations where that may be more challenging, in deindustrialised 'left behind' wasteland we can't all get on our bikes and find work.  But I loathe how it is now popular to blame those of us from relatively modest backgrounds, like me, who did see education and knowledge as a way to self improve. Now we are seen by some as smug liberals......  
    • Kwik Fit buggered up an A/C leak diagnosis for me (saying there wasn't one, when there was) and sold a regas. The vehicle had to be taken to an A/C specialist for condensor replacement and a further regas. Not impressed.
    • Yes, these are all good points. I agree with you, that division has led us down dangerous paths in the past. And I deplore any kind of racism (as I think you probably know).  But I feel that a lot of the current wave of xenophobia we're witnessing is actually more about a general malaise and discontent. I know non-white people around here who are surprisingly vocal about immigrants - legal or otherwise. I think this feeling transcends skin colour for a lot of people and isn't as simple as, say, the Jew hatred of the 1930s or the Irish and Black racism that we saw laterally. I think people feel ignored and looked down upon.  What you don't realise, Sephiroth, is that I actually agree with a lot of what you're saying. I just think that looking down on people because of their voting history and opinions is self-defeating. And that's where Labour's getting it wrong and Reform is reaping the rewards.   
    • @Sephiroth you made some interesting points on the economy, on the Lammy thread. Thought it worth broadening the discussion. Reeves (irrespective of her financial competence) clearly was too downbeat on things when Labour came into power. But could there have been more honesty on the liklihood of taxes going up (which they have done, and will do in any case due to the freezing of personal allowances).  It may have been a silly commitment not to do this, but were you damned if you do and damned if you don't?
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...