Jump to content

Recommended Posts

El Pibe - great project, not boring at all and doing it this way as a new development will help reduce costs. Insulation = key. I would hope that at least your architect knows about thermal briding tho.


Solar PV does not need direct sunlight they are capable of generating some electricity on cloudy days.

Micro CHP is still powered by mains gas or LPG, which is very expensive in rural areas. Biomass waste wood chips/pellets/logs worth thinkgin about.


Choice of air/or ground source heat pumps would be dependent on your heating demands and what other heating you have (eg air to air ones don't provide hot water, do you want underfloor heating at low temp over long period of time etc). Air source is easier to install than ground source but this may not be aproblem in your case.

For generation, mini wind (needs a detached property) but costs would be huge and not related to what it delivers.


Check if there are any financial incentives for investing in new technology which may help and good luck! am going to send you some links too which should help you to choose.

These guys are brilliant; Centre For Alternative Technology.


They do short eco building courses and have loads of books and pamphlets for sale.


I have been to visit the site loads of times since I was a kid and still love going there.


They are very inspiring.

Am building a house at present and looked into all this.


Short summary is that the "cool" eco technologies generally didn't stack up whereas the "boring" ones did, i.e. insulation.


Ground Source Heat Pump GSHP


Waste of time when I looked at it. Coefficient of performance of 3-4x. This means for evey unit of enery used driving the pump you get 3-4 units worth of heat back. So far so good. However, driven by electricity and transmission losses between generation (power station) and point of use approach 75% so net net you have not really gained anything when compared to an efficient gas boiler.


Gas - no transmission losses, decent condensing boiler c.95% efficient.


I think it could be justifiable if you were using PV solar panels to drive the pump, but this only stacks up if you are a net generator of energy, i.e. you can power all your other kit and kaboodle and there is a surplus for the GSHP.


GSHP does make sense in remote locations off the gas network where the alternative is electric central heating. In this limited case you benefit from the 3-4x COP compared to electric heaters. i.e. it allows you to recover to being as efficient as gas...


Solar Panels and Feed in Tariffs


Complete nonsense in this country IMHO.

The embodied energy in producing and installing these things can outweigh the carbon saving from electricity generation. The environmental argument is certainly thin. The economic argument is easier with the feed in tariff but this is questionable from a social perspective. Basically energy companies are allowed by the regulator to operate at a certain profit level. If customers install solar panels then the energy company pays them for the energy they generate (even if they use it and don't export any energy back to the grid) and so they get to charge the other customers a higher rate so that they make the same overall profit. So you are basically stealing from your neighbours and generally cash rich people can afford the panels whereas poorer people don't have the option. Anti social behaviour total green washing without any substance behind it. Save the planet and the hassle by just stealing things from your neighbours.


Insulation and Passivhaus


Genuinely very good idea and makes sense. Super insulate your house (e.g. timber frame with 300mm insulation. Tape and seal the whole house so it is totally air tight. Triple glazing with special coated glazing. Eliminate thermal bridging. Exhaust air heat exchange so all air changes in the house go through a heat recovery system rather than trickle vents on doors and windows. All seems to stack up.


As mentioned above, hard to retro fit. Best designed in up front.




Thermal Solar Panels


Basically hot water in black sacks on the roof. Next best thing to spend money on after insulation. Seemed to stack up. Downsides are too much hot water in summer and not enough in winter but still probably worthwhile. Comes into its own if you have a pool as you need a heat sink to dump excess hot in and this heats the pool in Summer when you want it most.




Good Luck, sounds like an ace project. Building in London absolutely sucks.

Good advice SC, thanks for that.

We are pretty remote so are almost definitely going with SPV, hopefully we can get some pretty decent output as we have a lot of surface area to work with.


Everyone in that part of the world goes with oil burners which is something we're very keen to avoid if possible for a whole host of reasons about cost (present and future), sustainability, energy security and of course carbon footprint.

I'll add my 2 p: Dig in into the ground so the roof becomes a wild flower hill. Ground source heat. Facing south. Entirely triple gas filled glass front. Wind turbine off to the side. I'm 50% solar generated hot water and electricity on a mid terrasse wrong facing house. Lucky you to build. Look at all the German prefab fab stuff.
Much as I love some of the wackier stuff out there, we are quite limited in how zany we can be as the original farmhouse and outhouses are listed and basically need to end up looking like they do now...only without the rotting crumbling ex/interiors obviously.
Well done. My house has been insulated to within an inch of its life and powers itself (very efficiently) off solar energy panels. Not sure about any of the technical specifications. The house is very warm and I don't get big energy bills. Nice.
  • 4 weeks later...

Can I just say a big thank you to Ruairi firstly for the above freely offered advice, and subsequently for the passive report, calculations and patient advice to myself and La Piba. We now have a much clearer picture of where we're headed with all of this.

If anyone else is thinking of doing similar things and is thinking of talking to someone, he now officially has the El Pibe seal of approval ;)

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • And from what I remember, she eventually cut the tea shop for a similar  reason to chandelier.  Chariot style buggies
    • Oh yes, it could have been about there, I can't remember exactly. At one point there seemed to be a load of pizza places opening on NCR. I vaguely remember the one we used to use was put out of business by another one which opened. Wasn't Grace and Favour's food offering more of a tea shop at the back of the actual shop? If memory serves the owner, whose name escapes me now, was one of the earliest people I know to move to Hastings. Which must now be crammed with South East Londoners 🤣
    • That Neal Street veggie cafe was great. Food For Thought ❤️
    • Hi Dogkennelhillbilly, You won't be aware that i proposed infill sites for housing in East Dulwich - the garages on Bassano Street and Henslowe that respectively became 1-4 Dill Terrace family houses and the 78, 80, 80A Henslowe Street family houses. These were council owned garages and it was frustrating how slow the council was to go from my idea to completion (roughly eight years). East Dulwich has some other vacant WW2 bomb sites I'm guessing that the private land owners have been sitting on.Owe for a land tax for vacant land.  WRT to the builders yard by East dulwich station. Southwark Council has an agreed policy the area should remain suburban 2/3 storeys maximum. But the approved scheme is 9 storeys of student accommodation. Very hard to put this genie back in the bottle. The council has recently publicly stated lower ratios of social housing will be required. I will be amazed if the developer doesn't submit another application now they have the 9 storeys approved but with significantly less social housing. The less social housing the higher the land values. The higher the land values the less social housing viability reports state are possible.  If we really want to increase home supply - Southwark have over 6,000 empty homes. Vancouver charges a low % of the value of empty homes and rapidly eased this problem. Parts of Wales have introduced under Article 4 planning permission is required for second homes seeing within 12 months a dramatic decrease in property prices. Southwark Council have Article 4 requirements - why not add this one? It takes National political will to solve this AND regional and local authorities such as the second home council tax premium and these being used promptly. 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...