Jump to content

Recommended Posts

macroban Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> From the Coucil documentation is looks like no

> residents have been consulted.

>

>


It says here they have


http://planningonline.southwarksites.com/planningonline2/AcolNetCGI.exe?ACTION=UNWRAP&RIPNAME=Root.PgeNeighbours&TheSystemkey=9526750

macroban Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> No according to this.

>

> Only two consultees - both internal to Southwark

> Council.


You're looking at the list of internal consultees, so that makes sense.

Neighbours are listed elsewhere - if you read the page you're referring to, closely, there's a link there to neighbours.

It might be worth looking into the applicant - are they sufficiently robust to ensure that the site doesn't go derelict in the short term?


Remember that Southwark Council may be favourably disposed because outdoor companies often deliver other 'rewards' such as street furniture to councils that grant concessions.


It may also be possible to ensure that the site is only lit at reasonable hours.


If it is a rotating site please also be aware that their intermittent rumblings can drive a chap to the edge of insanity...


In the main though pretty ads aren't always a bad thing. Hello Boys...


http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2413/2128201006_207ddf464c.jpg?v=0

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Sue. You really don’t have to keep saying about the electoral system    a) we all know about it b) it doesn’t matter    FPTP is the system we have always had and hopefully we will get rid of it someday but it is what it is    when anyone suggests changing the system Corbyn is right there at the front of the queue to prevent it   so its pointless him or any of supporters complaining about it    the evidence you want is the result of the elections. You can’t have clearer evidence. 
    • Has anyone from the school commented? Have they said why? Is it a fresh start? Is it that Grove in the name may have connotations of wealth and they want to attract more applicants from a wider area? Is that it currently is linked to the DKH Estate? 
    • As you quite rightly say a sample of 500 is extremely  small. (actually unrepresentative in the scheme of things) Now corbyn has his own party or should that be Party, it'll be interesting to see if it is merely a "think tank" or if it contests seats and then if they win any and if they chase currently held seats by Labour. It'll be even more amusing if it unseats current Labour Ministers though.   
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...