Jump to content

CPZ Recommendations out

Hare

By Hare
in General ED Issues / Gossip

 Share

Recommended Posts

Abe_froeman

Abe_froeman

Posted
Posted

A lot of the numbers used to jsutify the conlcusino don't even make sense.


"Responses (569 in total) from 33 streets around Melbourne Grove were analysed to determine if there was

enough support from respondents here.


...


Officers have analysed the difference in responses north and south of East Dulwich Grove for the Melbourne

Grove area. The results show that we received the majority of responses from the south (50) with 35 from the

north. "

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Siduhe

Siduhe

Posted
Posted

singalto Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Who is surprised? And diesel cars have to pay more

> to park?


I hadn't picked that up until you posted that - on what basis does charging diesel drivers more for the paid parking have anything to do with parking pressure? Surely that's well out of remit? I don't drive a diesel so have no skin in that game but it seems to conflate two totally different issues.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share
Go to topic listing
  • Advertise Here

  • Latest Discussions

    • first mate
      Latest One Dulwich update

      By first mate · Posted

      Okay Earl, of those 'consulted' how many voices were in favour of the junction and how many against? Were there more responses in favour or more against? This local junction change is being driven by Southwark Labour Councillors- not as you assert by Central Govt. Also, if consultations are so irrelevant as indicators of meaningful local support in the way you seem to imply, why do organisations like Southwark Cyclists constantly ask their members to respond to all and any consultation on LTN's and CPZ's?  
    • first mate
      Cyclists taking over paths!!

      By first mate · Posted

      You could apply the same argument to any kind of penalty as an effective deterrent.  Better than doing nothing. 
    • Earl Aelfheah
      Latest One Dulwich update

      By Earl Aelfheah · Posted

      Check the link I provided above. It’s gives a very full account of where the push for LTNs came from, (in brief, central government). The consultation did not show that the majority of local residents were against the LTN. Not for the first time, you’ve confused a ‘consultation’ with a ‘referendum’. The outcome of local elections (which many opposed to LTNs excitedly promoted as a referendum on the scheme), suggested they are actually quite popular. All the polling on LTNs generally, also shows majority support across London.
    • first mate
      Latest One Dulwich update

      By first mate · Posted

      Rockets said: "Perhaps you should be asking who is lobbying the council to close the junction or parts of it or why the council is happy to waste so much of our money on it - who are they representing as even their own consultation demonstrated they did not have support from the local community for the measures? The results showed the majority of local residents were against the measure...but they are going ahead with them anyway" This.   

East Dulwich Forum

Established in 2006, we are an online community discussion forum for people who live, work in and visit SE22.

Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...