geh

any updates on this topic please, good or bad? I have engaged an ED firm, who granted told me they would be slow, but........... I need a will before I die (of old age hopefully) thanks

Apologies for my pedantry but in the same way Dulwich Hamlet is singular, it’s The Dulwich Estate, just the one. Sorry again.

still getting post from November!

No independents are being threatened with the arrival of Poundland (replacing another chain Foxtons), and the increase in footfall will more than make up for any losses independents make. It’s competition, pure and simple. except when it comes to rent review time

what's the cost/benefit, it would be useful if Southwark detailed the revenue raised. More useful still if that was directed/ring-fenced within Peckham Rye area, but I realise that's optimistic.

ate in there last night, and delighted to confirm its as superb as ever!

also, and more importantly Cauliflowear, why are you so vile?

Cauliflowerear Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > I used to think Johnnies but they seem to put up > their prices every month, pure greed, hopefully > they go out of business. can't imagine why they would be putting up their prices monthly now?

37 ED to Brixton, I used to use this all the time, can't face sitting on it now, and presumably when Herne Hill 'improvements' enacted it will be even slower. Two consequences, no spend directed to local Brixton Market, restaurants/bars, plus if going into town, more often or not get an uber - so that's not terrible good is it!

Labour flyer through the door (Goose Green Ward) this week, appreciate that its not the full manifesto but no mention of LTN's - not exactly conviction politics is it? Nothing from the other parties (any of them). Not sure who is the least bad...

In any other world taking money for a service when you have either no ability, or no intention of delivering that service is called fraud. So frustrating, and I have no confidence that anything currently in the sorting office will ever be delivered.

absolutely lets do this, then we can all truly share the benefits EDAus Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > Ashbourne Grove has become the driveway to > Melbourne Grove South, we have had an increase in > traffic, speeding and pollution - all the multiple > cars, vans and delivery trucks. > > The residents of Ashbourne Grove were promised our > views and concerns would be considered when the > proposals were reviewed, this seemed fair as we > were the ones adversely affected. > > What happened? When Councillor Rose visited > Melbourne Grove South she was taken into a > pro-barrier house and other residents were stopped > from approaching her ? how is this is fair and > transparent? > > Low traffic neighbourhoods do work but not the way > they are being implemented in East Dulwich. > > If Melbourne Grove South want their barrier and > the council are serious about climate change and > active travel, they need to remove all the parking > between Tell and Ashbourne Grove. That section of > road should be reclaimed and made into a bike shed > and a community garden with a bike track through > it. Strangely that option has been soundly > rejected by the ?local? residents every time it > has been raised.

LTN?s definitely altering my transport habits. I now never get the 37 to Brixton to then get the tube, too congested, too painful, too slow. What I have done is to make a conscious decision to only purchase pre 40 year old vehicles that are classed as classics and exempt from Ulez and Congestion charge. Someone once said for every action, there is an equal and opposite reaction!

eastdulwichhenry Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > I received an update on plans from the council > today, and I opened it with some trepidation, > thinking they might decide to just scrap the whole > LTN based on the noisy objections like those we > see here, reversing the gains we've made in ease > of walking and cycling on Melbourne Grove/Calton > Avenue, but apparently it's even better news than > that, they've decided not to proceed with the > Melbourne Grove south reopening. If I understood > correctly, that's great news. Reopening that route > as a LL to EDG rat-run would have reversed some of > the fantastic gains that we've made due to the LTN > - in particular the ability to go from ED station > to the library along a largely traffic-free route. yup, great news, great for the businesses that have closed great for those that are suffering great news

or is it 100% diverted from landfill? Perhaps it's that, but I think one leaves the centre thinking the situation may be better than in fact it really is?

slarti b Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > Renata Hamvas Wrote: > -------------------------------------------------- > ----- > I don't know exactly the total recycling > percentage but nothing goes to landfill and > nothing goes abroad. Most of the recycled > material > > According to Govt figures for Southwark, about 35% > of household is sent for recycling. This puts > Southwark in the bottom 25% of boroughs across the > UK. The Govt figures don't say the waste sent for > recycling ends up being burned, is that something > you can find out? > > As a long term councillor I am surprised you > didn't know this sort of stuff already ;-) ? This is a rather disappointing read, I'm sure I recall from previous visits to the Old Kent Rd centre, as will others, that the signage proudly claims 100% of the materials are recycled. Cllr Hamvas, it would be useful to understand whether this statement is true, or in fact another interpretation of the facts, perhaps you would be able to clarify for me please? Thanks

30 minutes today to go 0.9 miles though the village up 1/2 moon lane this afternoon. last sat, 40 minutes on the bus, prob 1.1 miles its not the public school run traffic LTN's have not caused traffic/congestion to evaporate its a complete f*****g mess this is now a thoroughly difficult and unpleasant place to live, sorry, but that's my experience. thanks

As per most city noises during the night I find it rather comforting. Think dogs and kids can learn to live with it.

Tet?

moped, not motorbike (apparently)

if money from endless and pointless consultations were used, plus the million odd quid from the DV junction works rendered obsolete by the closure and creation of Dulwich Square, Leeming may find the cost more palatable.

'fairest', by penalising those who can least afford to shoulder such a price increase - a wonderful if unintentional illustration of some of what is wrong in our society!

had to go to Cumbria the other week, (actually in the end it was cancelled), 2 of us. Train tickets ?225 each! Each! then cab when we got there (each way as it was a rural venue) Cost to drive (Hybrid, will change to EV next year) prob c. ?50. What exactly should I do/have done given the cost differential? Believe me I have no desire to spend 6 hrs each way in a car (and much of that is getting out of SE22!). Nothing will really change unless there is an effective centrally subsidised public transport system. The conservative "for profit" approach is singularly inappropriate in many cases (as those whose energy providers are currently falling over are discovering).