Jump to content

Southwark council now introducing a ray of charges, strapped cash, or generating more??


Recommended Posts

The London Borough of Southwark have or are proposing extra charges in the borough, which has an affect of ED residents.


New charges to park at the lovely parks we have.


New charges for the brown bin / brown sacks.


Proposed new charges for a CPZ in the ED and West Peckham areas.


Increase Council tax bill


Is this the start of a strapped cash local authority, or an alternative to generate cash?

All councils are short of cash - the question is how do they generate it if government isn't providing enough and council tax can't be increased by more than a certain amount..


Do you generate cash from things people choose to do or things people need or even fines for littering and smoking or can we go after business somehow,if so what size ?


We (the residents of Southwark) should decide this so what we need is truth at the local elections (maybe ?).

The alternative when a council is short of funds is to look internally to see where savings can be made

E.g. Reduce top executives pay , golden handshakes and so on


Or stop rewarding failure , caused by departments spending all their funding to ensure they retain the same amount for next year, classic example is highways who implement a raft of unwanted works at the end of each tax year but plead poverty when pot holes need to be repaired. Why not try asking them to bank unused money each year, still get the same funds next and when money is needed it's in the bank ? (I realise it's a change in legislation and attitude)


There are possibly many savings and ideas to be had to maximise the existing inwards revenue, but sadly a council isn't run like a business or charity, it seems to be have the ability to spend more then it generates, expecting central government, residents and businesses to pay more for "essential" services and bail them out.



On a simple note, still can't work out why they relocated to a purpose built office in London Bridge, the most expensive area for real estate and associated charges when it would have been cheaper in the south of the borough , like Peckham or Camberwell, with the benefit of council officers purchasing items (lunch, shopping....) close to where they work thus benefitting the local economy and strategic growth of these areas. Mad decision

When they did locate all services to Tooley Street they found the building was too small and so had to get a another building in New Cross. So Tooley Street was North and New Cross South.


Many of the closed neighbourhood housing offices were sold off.


Also I believe I read somewhere that Southwark is purchasing commercial properties for revenue.


There does seem to be a large pot of money somewhere to be able to do this.

So much has been wasted in the economy on Brexit so far I don't see things improving in the next few years. No excuse for wasting local funds but I expect that LAs will continue to be hit by central funding.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • he's not on the general radar - not with the Labour tax scandal and the new Tories wanting to buddy up with Starmer (on their terms). if anything, he's a irrelevant distraction from some real alarms
    • Let me rephrase this He does not seem to be personally bothered by the impact he has.  Rather than immune from somebody taking action against him.  Although the bar had to be raised and raised before anyone did anything, and there are still those in his party who think it was wrong to get rid of him. He delivered a poor Brexit so didn't get that right.  He didn't believe in it, in the first place, he was just getting one up on his chum Dave.
    • 1. No he's not, he made a pigs ear of things, his leadership was poor and his behaviour was unbecoming of the highest office in the land.  2. No they don't,  he was a prime buffoon 3. Not a messiah, in no way. He caused great damage to both the Party and Country after three years of differing by May. The only thing he completed was B  r  e  x  i  t.  Are we paying the price. Don't ask me, I was in an induced coma at the time, fighting for my own life.    
    • My comment is trying to not take any political side but rather be objective on what I see, hear and read. If the Government made a positive difference to people's lives, people would be pro this Govt, but sadly the majority don't see an improvement since they have been in Office, but rather the opposite so people's opinions of the Government are poor.  I think if you did a straw poll of users on here, the result for those in favour of the Government is likely to be unfavourable, but I may be totally wrong, quite possible. No one I speak or am in contact with has a single good word to say about the current Administration. In fact the calls for a General Election just become stronger and stronger. 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...