Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I think that Southwark only publish the data for the local authority schools (of which there are very few)! otherwise its down to each school to release this data. If there are specific schools you are interested in the best approach might be to ask them.

Renata tends to have information on the LA schools before they are officially published. She is one of the councillors for nun head so do a search for her and then send her a message. While some schools are academies a number are still LA schools-- Heber and Goodrich among them.


Good luck

Southwark makes this information available in its primary school application booklet. Data for the 2018 intake is now online and data for the 2019-2020 intake will be available from around September, I should think. I don?t find Southwark to be terribly forthcoming with information.

Hi all, we haven't got the information yet, once it's out I will post on here. It's always just the LA primary schools as the voluntary aided (faith) and academies set their own admission processes. For non-LA schools you'll need to contact the schools directly.


Renata


ps I am a Peckham Rye Ward Councillor, the Nunhead and Queen's Road Councillors are Gavin Edwards, Sandra Rhule and Sunil Chopra. Peckham Rye Ward does encompass the southern part of Nunhead, the area to the East of Peckham Rye Park and part of Honor Oak.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Or increase tax.  The freezing of personal allowances is one way, not what I would choose.  On principle I don't care if the rich immigrate.  The main parties could have been more honest before the election.  Reform is deluded.
    • I edited my post because I couldn't be sure we were talking about politicians and I couldn't be bothered to read it all back. But it was off the back of a thread discussing labour councillors, so it went without saying really and I should have left it.  What I said was 'There's something very aggressive about language like that - it's not big and it's not clever. Some of the angry energy that comes from the far left is pretty self-defeating.' (In relation to a labour councillor rather immaturely, in my view, wearing a jumper that read 'fuck the Tories').  But I don't recall saying that "violent rhetoric" is exclusively the domain of the left wing. So I do think you're taking a bit of a bit of leap here. 
    • You literally just edited your earlier reply to remove the point you made about it being “politicians”.  Then you call me pathetic.    I’m  not trying to say you approve any of the ugly right wing nonsense.  But I AM Saying your earlier post suggesting  violent rhetoric being “left wing” was one-sided and incorrect 
    • I never said that. Saying I don’t like some of the rhetoric coming from the left doesn’t mean I approve of Farage et al saying that Afghans being brought here to protect their lives and thank them for their service means there is an incalculable threat to women.    Anything to score a cheap point. It’s pretty pathetic. 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...