Jump to content

dulwich plumbing and heating recommendation


Recommended Posts

just had the flat refubrished and had some work done in the shop, have been using dulwich plumbing and heating for long time, they always have provided value for the money, and being local make them convenient as well. to contact dulwich plumbing and heating call Daniel on 07879220447.
  • 3 weeks later...
  • 3 weeks later...
  • 1 year later...

Just wanted to say a big thank you to Daniel for doing an essential repair job in my bathroom over the Christmas period.

I highly recommend the work Dulwich plumbing and heating (07879220447)has done for me over last year. Wish all workmen were as efficient, polite, punctual, clean and tidy and reasonably priced.


Many thanks again and very happy new year to Daniel and his colleagues!

Although there are some positives..and that's why I opted for this companty, there are lots of posts elsewhere on this forum about the appalling "service" delivered by Dulwich Heating and Plumbing. I suggest you do a trawl of those before reaching a final decision about whether to use them. Their behaviour is predatory, dishonest and irresponsible. I am currently pursuing Daniel for work carried out at a rate of ?150 per hour, but which has not actually fixed the leak which he was contracted to do. I have full written documentation from Daniel admitting liability for failure to carry out the work, and undertakings to pay me back the ?150 owed, but which he simply refuses to pay back. I have no other option but to resort to the law to recover my money.

My experience is identical to many others that can be seen elsewhere on this site.

It would be interesting to cost up how much Daniel has cost members of this forum in uncompleted and/or bodged work.

Buyer beeware....personally I wouldn't touch with a bargepole and can not warn strongly enough against this company.

  • 3 months later...
Our experience is absolutely negative. We called Dulwich Heating and Plumbing out to look at a job. It was not intended to be done at all at this first meeting. The job involved replacing two motorised valves (one of which we had already purchased) and replacing a leaking flange attachment and then ensuring that the under-floor heating would then work. Daniel and two others arrived and promptly proceeded to fit the motorised valve that we already had and told me that further parts would be required. He then demanded ?200!! to reflect the fitting of the motorised valve and the bleeding of a towel rail only. It was not part-payment for the rest of the job. He asked if we could pay by cash and reduced the demand to ?180. He then reduced it to ?150. He had been at our house for less than 1 hour.He sought to justify this outrageous demand because he turned up with 2 other men. Foolishly we paid ?150. This was not an emergency call out but a request to price a job. We feel that he conned us. He then had the gall to suggest that the additional work would be done at a discount rate of ?400 labour only. That additional work would take at most one or possibly two hours.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Latest Discussions

    • I'm a bit worried by your sudden involvement on this Forum.  The former Prince Andrew is now Andrew Mountbatten Windsor Mountbatten in an anglicisation of Von Battenburg adopted by that branch of our Royal Family in 1917 due to anti-German sentiment. Another anglicisation could be simply Battenburg as in the checker board cake.  So I surmise that your are Andrew Battenburg, aka Andrew Mountbatten Windsor and that you have infiltrated social media so that the country can put the emphasis on Mandelson ather than yourself.  Bit of a failure. I don't expect an answer from police custody.  
    • We had John fit our PLYKEA kitchen (IKEA cabinets with custom doors) and would happily recommend him and Gabi to anyone. Gabi handled all communication and was brilliant throughout — responsive and happy to answer questions however detailed. John is meticulous, cares about the small details, and was a pleasure to have in the house. The carpentry required for the custom doors was done to a high standard, and he even refinished the plumbing under the sink to sit better with the new cabinets — a small touch that made a real difference. They were happy to return and tie up a few things that couldn't be finished in the time, which we appreciated. No hesitations recommending them.
    • Not sure about that. Rockets seems to have (rightly in my view) identified two key motivating elements in Mcash's defection: anger at his previous (arguably shabby) treatment and a (linked) desire to trash the Labour party, nationally and locally. The defection, timed for maximum damage, combined with the invective and moral exhibitionism of his statement counts as rather more than a "hissy fit".  I would add a third motivation of political ambition: it's not inconceivable that he has his eye on the Dulwich & West Norwood seat which is predicted to go Green.  James Barber was indulging in typical LibDem sleight of hand, claiming that Blair introduced austerity to *councils* before the coalition. This is a kind of sixth form debating point. From 1997-1999 Labour broadly stuck to Tory spending totals, meaning there was limited growth in departmental spending, including local govt grants. However local government funding rose substantially in the Noughties, especially in education and social care. It is a matter of record that real-terms local authority spending increased in the Blair / Brown years overall. So he's manifestly wrong (or only right if the focus is on 1997-1999, which would be a bizarre focus and one he didn't include in his claim) but he wasn't claiming Blair introduced austerity more widely. 
    • My view is that any party that welcomes a self-declared Marxist would merit a negative point. 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...