Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Everything has a cost - the accidental death of a horse in a circumstances unrelated to the actual filming (the horse was returning to its stable with its stable lad) seems to me to be an unfortunate, sad and perhaps distressing event but not a reason to cancel a highly regarded and critically lauded show.

Undisputedtruth Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> To give a different perspective to your question,

> is the life of horses less important than your

> entertainment?


Yes it is. In the same way that the life of a Cow is less important than me enjoying a steak.

I find it very hard to believe it has been cancelled because of the horse deaths.


I?m more inclined to believe that the viewing figures aren?t holding up and they were looking for an excuse to can the series


I?m a big fan of David Milch (Deadwood remains one of my all time favourite ? but that too never saw a proper end to series 3) but I don?t know if enough people are

maxxi Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Given that figures of 600+ horse deaths at race

> meetings in 2006 in the USA were part of another

> thread on here a while back it does seem an

> over-reaction.

>

> Can't see people in this country caring much

> either way.

>

> Five have already died at the year's Cheltenham.


That's why I don't bet on Horses.

the-e-dealer Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> and 2000 retired Race Horses cannot be traced. yum

> Yum


There are many more than 2000 horses taken fron the USA to slaughter in Mexico and Canada every year (to avoid US Govt. guidelines) and these are predominantly non-racehorses. The same thing happens in Japan. It's not a racehorse thing - just a horse thing. (And yes they are mainly a food product - those that aren't eaten by humans are made into pet food).

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Thanks very much for that.   I think the better informed we are, the better our discussions will be. The article contained: "That arrest had quite an impact on the [phone theft] numbers for the following month,” said Green.  Here's another indicator, admittedly a piece of police PR,  of how well-targeted police efforts, mostly invisible to us,  can when successful  seriously affect offending figures: https://news.met.police.uk/news/met-police-drive-down-theft-and-robbery-by-84-percent-in-battersea-and-nine-elms-500495.  
    • Another excellent article from Jim Waterson's London Centric reporting https://www.londoncentric.media/p/kitchen-foil-and-algerian-markets?utm_source=substack&utm_medium=email Interesting that there seem to be favoured and repeated routes for phone snatching for particular thieves.  Seems ED might be one of them ☹️
    • Anywhere near the Overground/Windrush due to its excellent transport links.  You will get larger place in SE23 for example that will give you enough spare cash for private school if that's what you really want but states schools generally good, reflecting the demographic  Easy to get to the bustling streets of East Dulwich but in ten years see what happens to Forest Hill centre.  The whole of the area is full of green spaces. Access to East Croydon for days out in the South Coast   
    • Could East Dulwich or Forest Hill work? Some properties on Underhill Road and Wood Vale have large gardens e.g.  https://www.rightmove.co.uk/properties/161079866#/?channel=RES_BUY  You'd be close to the Horniman, Dulwich Park and Peckham Rye. Transport might not be what you're looking for though e.g. a 15 minute walk to Forest Hill station for the East London line or mainline into London Bridge.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...