Jump to content

Recommended Posts

We recently looked at a 1930s semi in the area. There was a fireplace in the regular sized hall. It was tiled over and I don?t see how it could ever have functioned as a real fireplace given it?s against an external wall with no chimney! Zoopla shows a few houses of the same style with something similar. Could it have been for coal delivery once upon a time? Can?t find a single clue online.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • "uneconomical to repair" - what does this mean? I can  adk a friend to repair it for a fraction of the council cost - why is this not  an option? Money wasted on closed  Dulwich Village junction absolutely relevant - where does it come from? Why there is money to spend on closed DV and yet nothing left for the bridge in Dulwich Park - if this is a reason for the repair delays?
    • The council can use money from PCNs on this type of thing, there is a category called Projects in Parks that they have spent revenue raised from PCNs etc on previously. I very much hope they find the money from somewhere.
    • They haven't said it's because of "lack of money", they have said it's "uneconomical to repair", which is quite different! If they had spent a lot of money repairing it, some people would be complaining about that!  I assume (and it's just an assumption, as obviously I am not privy to their thought processes) that they have decided that  the amount of money necessary to repair it would be better put towards a completely new bridge. The money spent on the  refurbishment of the Dulwich Village junction is irrelevant, surely?  I don't know how council budgets are worked out, but surely these two budgets must be completely separate pots of money, and they  can't take money from one pot and put it in the other pot ? (sorry, I don't mean to sound as if I'm explaining this to a three year old). Well, we don't know that without knowing all the details, do we? That's a very big assumption/accusation. Though I agree that on the face of it, it doesn't look good if the bridge has become unfit for purpose in such a short time.
    • Whoever authorised the building and the spending of all that money is clearly not capable of doing their job. 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...