Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Just wondering if anyone knows how many times a day one needs to breastfeed in order to have lowered levels of oestrogen? Is lowered oestrogen something that lasts say for two hours after a feed? (for example)


If a breastfeeding mother needed to increase her levels of oestrogen (not to conceive) but didn't want to give up breastfeeding completely would this be possible? Or would she need to give up completely?

My midwife told me that once feeds are consistently more than three hours apart, ovulation was more more likely. (I don't know on what she was basing that, maybe just experience.) I would infer from this that there is a threshold level for prolactin production in order supress oestrogen, but that's likely to differ greatly among women b/c every mother-baby dyad is different.


I've no idea about oestrogen kinetics immediately post-breastfeed, but judging by how hormones systems run in general, I would guess there are small, acute cycles of rising and falling oestrogen on a background of very low, slowly rising oestrogen over a period of many months when babies are demand-fed and slowly weaned. This could possibly be very different in the case of scheduled feeding or abrupt weaning.


You could increase oestrogen by consuming a diet high in natural oestrogens, but the result might be that you interfer with prolactin to the extent that breastfeeding is compromised.


Is it the symptoms of low eostrogen that you're trying to address (fatigue, insomnia, night sweats)?

A friend needs to increase her Oestrogen levels prior to an operation, is already on oestrogen supplements but is worried that if she is still breast feeding when the call up for the op comes they'll refuse to do in on the grounds that it's success is unlikely if oestrogen levels are low
I think she really needs to have interim blood work done to check hormone levels, if there is a real likelihood that she might be refused on grounds of low oestrogen. Is the surgery to correct uterine prolapse (increased oestrogen thought to help this) or similar? Would a pessary hormone ring provide better local uptake of oestrogen w/o excessive systemic exposure, thereby limiting the likelihood of interfering with b/fing?

Stitches were done well according to doc but there may have been grazes that were missed and have healed with the stitches, so in effect she has been stitched up too much! Needs re-cutting and stitching..:(

She has localised cream to apply apparently but I will suggest she discuss the bloods with whoever she is dealing with, thanks a lot for the links too Saffron

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • I'm a bit worried by your sudden involvement on this Forum.  The former Prince Andrew is now Andrew Mountbatten Windsor Mountbatten in an anglicisation of Von Battenburg adopted by that branch of our Royal Family in 1917 due to anti-German sentiment. Another anglicisation could be simply Battenburg as in the checker board cake.  So I surmise that your are Andrew Battenburg, aka Andrew Mountbatten Windsor and that you have infiltrated social media so that the country can put the emphasis on Mandelson ather than yourself.  Bit of a failure. I don't expect an answer from police custody.  
    • We had John fit our PLYKEA kitchen (IKEA cabinets with custom doors) and would happily recommend him and Gabi to anyone. Gabi handled all communication and was brilliant throughout — responsive and happy to answer questions however detailed. John is meticulous, cares about the small details, and was a pleasure to have in the house. The carpentry required for the custom doors was done to a high standard, and he even refinished the plumbing under the sink to sit better with the new cabinets — a small touch that made a real difference. They were happy to return and tie up a few things that couldn't be finished in the time, which we appreciated. No hesitations recommending them.
    • Not sure about that. Rockets seems to have (rightly in my view) identified two key motivating elements in Mcash's defection: anger at his previous (arguably shabby) treatment and a (linked) desire to trash the Labour party, nationally and locally. The defection, timed for maximum damage, combined with the invective and moral exhibitionism of his statement counts as rather more than a "hissy fit".  I would add a third motivation of political ambition: it's not inconceivable that he has his eye on the Dulwich & West Norwood seat which is predicted to go Green.  James Barber was indulging in typical LibDem sleight of hand, claiming that Blair introduced austerity to *councils* before the coalition. This is a kind of sixth form debating point. From 1997-1999 Labour broadly stuck to Tory spending totals, meaning there was limited growth in departmental spending, including local govt grants. However local government funding rose substantially in the Noughties, especially in education and social care. It is a matter of record that real-terms local authority spending increased in the Blair / Brown years overall. So he's manifestly wrong (or only right if the focus is on 1997-1999, which would be a bizarre focus and one he didn't include in his claim) but he wasn't claiming Blair introduced austerity more widely. 
    • My view is that any party that welcomes a self-declared Marxist would merit a negative point. 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...