Jump to content

Preparations for Trump's State visit 3-5 June - Demo central London on Tuesday


Recommended Posts

http://togetheragainsttrump.org.uk/plans-for-the-day/


'National Demonstration: Tuesday 4 June


Assemble 11am at Trafalgar Square, march to Downing Street and then to Parliament Square, creating a Trump-free zone and Carnival of Resistance.


Join the Facebook event for latest updates. Check the Getting There page for coaches to London.


Leaflets are available to pick up from Unite, 128 Theobalds Road, London, WC1X 8TN. It?s also available to download if you can get them printed yourself.'


Leaflet attached as pdf

Sue Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I understand part of Downing Street is being

> closed off by police, so it won't be possible to

> get directly to Parliament Square from Trafalgar

> Square, or vice versa?



There is a petition calling for the police to reverse that decision: https://www.change.org/p/metropolitan-police-let-protesters-march-against-trump-on-4th-june?recruiter=198717631&utm_source=share_petition&utm_medium=copylink&utm_campaign=share_petition


More info also at: https://www.peoplesworld.org/article/london-activists-you-cant-stop-us-from-marching-against-trump/

DulwichFox Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Trafalgar Square is connected to Parliament Square

> Via Whitehall and Parliament Street.

> Downing street is Off of Whitehall and has no

> public access.

>

> they would need to close Whitehall



They would not need to close the whole of Whitehall, Dulwich Fox, and were not intending to.


Not from what I understand, anyway.


ETA: My understanding was that they were going to block off part of the middle so that demonstrators could not gather near the entrance to Downing Street, and also could not walk down Whitehall directly between Trafalgar Square and Parliament Square, but would have to go a longer way round.

IlonaM Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Sue Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > I understand part of Downing Street is being

> > closed off by police, so it won't be possible

> to

> > get directly to Parliament Square from

> Trafalgar

> > Square, or vice versa?

>

>

> There is a petition calling for the police to

> reverse that decision:

> https://www.change.org/p/metropolitan-police-let-p

> rotesters-march-against-trump-on-4th-june?recruite

> r=198717631&utm_source=share_petition&utm_medium=c

> opylink&utm_campaign=share_petition

>

> More info also at:

> https://www.peoplesworld.org/article/london-activi

> sts-you-cant-stop-us-from-marching-against-trump/



The petition doesn't seem to have any signatures, from your link???

Sue Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> IlonaM Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > Sue Wrote:

> >

> --------------------------------------------------

>

> > -----

> > > I understand part of Downing Street is being

> > > closed off by police, so it won't be possible

> > to

> > > get directly to Parliament Square from

> > Trafalgar

> > > Square, or vice versa?

> >

> >

> > There is a petition calling for the police to

> > reverse that decision:

> >

> https://www.change.org/p/metropolitan-police-let-p

>

> >

> rotesters-march-against-trump-on-4th-june?recruite

>

> >

> r=198717631&utm_source=share_petition&utm_medium=c

>

> > opylink&utm_campaign=share_petition

> >

> > More info also at:

> >

> https://www.peoplesworld.org/article/london-activi

>

> >

> sts-you-cant-stop-us-from-marching-against-trump/

>

>

> The petition doesn't seem to have any signatures,

> from your link???



Over 70,000!


Try this link: https://www.change.org/p/metropolitan-police-let-protesters-march-against-trump-on-4th-june

snoopy17 Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> No respect.

>

> Why didn't you protest when the royal family had

> dinner with the saudi government?


...Saudi who?

What about boycotting Brunei...?

I do so love selective outrage/moral relativity. ;-)

Angelina Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> What's this all about, Trump wants business deals

> with NHS?



That's the US Ambassador Woody Johnson (family company Johnson and Johnson).


https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Johnson_%26_Johnson

JohnL Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> The Presidential plane is in sight over Stanstead

> when Sky News break that the President has just

> tweeted that Sadiq Khan is a loser.


Not before Khan was disrespectful to Trump- Khan is taking the visit as a great opportunity for electioneering...


And in reply to ZT...Trump was elected many people obviously supported his policies and are still happy with them. I am not sure where his decision about the transgender people in the military is coming from but that is for them to decide and I dare say the military have reported on the cost of surgeries and treatment and the disruption to service by transgender soldiers and a decision was made. I do believe that the democrats will jump on anything they can to smear Trump- much like the attitude of the far-left in the UK ...after all that is the nature of the filthy world of politics...and at the end of the day 'we' all love an endless supply of cheap labour- it kind of fits in with 'I want that and I want it NOW'

uncleglen Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> JohnL Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > The Presidential plane is in sight over

> Stanstead

> > when Sky News break that the President has just

> > tweeted that Sadiq Khan is a loser.

>

> Not before Khan was disrespectful to Trump- Khan

> is taking the visit as a great opportunity for

> electioneering...

>

> And in reply to ZT...Trump was elected many people

> obviously supported his policies and are still

> happy with them. I am not sure where his decision

> about the transgender people in the military is

> coming from but that is for them to decide and I

> dare say the military have reported on the cost of

> surgeries and treatment and the disruption to

> service by transgender soldiers and a decision was

> made. I do believe that the democrats will jump on

> anything they can to smear Trump- much like the

> attitude of the far-left in the UK ...after all

> that is the nature of the filthy world of

> politics...and at the end of the day 'we' all love

> an endless supply of cheap labour- it kind of fits

> in with 'I want that and I want it NOW'


Wrong on all counts. You appear to be a Trump supporter and notice the way you slip in your view on transgender and the military. Also your use of the word "filthy". All round depressing.

Ooo... We shouldn't take things out of context.


Trump openly tweeted:


"Sadiq Khan, who by all accounts has done a terrible job as Mayor of London, has been foolishly 'nasty' to the visiting President of the United States, by far the most important ally of the United Kingdom. He is a stone cold loser who should focus on crime in London, not me.


Kahn reminds me very much of our very dumb and incompetent Mayor of NYC, de Blasio, who has also done a terrible job - only half his height.


In any event, I look forward to being a great friend to the United Kingdom, and am looking very much forward to my visit. Landing now."


I completely agree with him because he's right.

Maybaby Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> snoopy17 Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > No respect.

> >

> > Why didn't you protest when the royal family

> had

> > dinner with the saudi government?

>

> ...Saudi who?

> What about boycotting Brunei...?

> I do so love selective outrage/moral relativity.

> ;-)



You wont find the far-left boycotting anyone of colour. It wouldn't support their narrative of being anti-racist. :)


Takes me back to a very interesting "debate". This gave me the tickles.


 

The truth & reality of the situation is that the UK will be leaving the EU - that is what the majority of Britain voted for. Whilst those who voted remain are busy doing this




or storming the streets like the sore losers that they are, the fact still stands that we are due to leave the EU, so I'm curious to know whether they've been spending any of the past 2 years productively thinking of ways to help themselves.


I take it the far-left are more comfortable with a hard-Brexit than they make out to be, given that they're chasing away our greatest ally.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • The current wave of xenophobia is due to powerful/influential people stirring up hatred.  It;'s what happened in the past, think 1930s Germany.  It seems to be even easier now as so many get their information from social media, whether it is right or wrong.  The media seeking so called balance will bring some nutter on, they don't then bring a nutter on to counteract that. They now seem to turn to Reform at the first opportunity. So your life is 'shite', let;s blame someone else.  Whilst sounding a bit like a Tory, taking some ownership/personal responsibility would be a start.  There are some situations where that may be more challenging, in deindustrialised 'left behind' wasteland we can't all get on our bikes and find work.  But I loathe how it is now popular to blame those of us from relatively modest backgrounds, like me, who did see education and knowledge as a way to self improve. Now we are seen by some as smug liberals......  
    • Kwik Fit buggered up an A/C leak diagnosis for me (saying there wasn't one, when there was) and sold a regas. The vehicle had to be taken to an A/C specialist for condensor replacement and a further regas. Not impressed.
    • Yes, these are all good points. I agree with you, that division has led us down dangerous paths in the past. And I deplore any kind of racism (as I think you probably know).  But I feel that a lot of the current wave of xenophobia we're witnessing is actually more about a general malaise and discontent. I know non-white people around here who are surprisingly vocal about immigrants - legal or otherwise. I think this feeling transcends skin colour for a lot of people and isn't as simple as, say, the Jew hatred of the 1930s or the Irish and Black racism that we saw laterally. I think people feel ignored and looked down upon.  What you don't realise, Sephiroth, is that I actually agree with a lot of what you're saying. I just think that looking down on people because of their voting history and opinions is self-defeating. And that's where Labour's getting it wrong and Reform is reaping the rewards.   
    • @Sephiroth you made some interesting points on the economy, on the Lammy thread. Thought it worth broadening the discussion. Reeves (irrespective of her financial competence) clearly was too downbeat on things when Labour came into power. But could there have been more honesty on the liklihood of taxes going up (which they have done, and will do in any case due to the freezing of personal allowances).  It may have been a silly commitment not to do this, but were you damned if you do and damned if you don't?
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...