Jump to content

Recommended Posts



You should realise that it is a breach of someone's human rights to ask them to interrupt a mobile phone call in order that you can have a conversation with them. The person deprived of their phone call can claim damages under the Human Rights Act.


What's all this nonsense about the LL PO being busy being used by all the middle classes? Whenever I go there, there are plenty of people who don't appear to fit into the "middle class" category.

giggirl Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I think it should be a given that customers who

> need to fill out forms should stand aside to do

> it. I use the PO a lot and I arrive with my

> envelopes ready to be scanned. I literally only

> take seconds at the counter. If you need to fill

> out a form, borrow a pen, finish selotaping your

> package, or anything else that does not require

> staff input, then stand aside and let someone else


Good girl giggirl erm, anyway - absolutely spot on - be prepared, bring sellotape and a pen. been using it since way back when, and always exchage pleasentries. They are human beings behind the counter as well... and as for the phone thing - the height of rudeness.

> be served. It's soul destroying to watch staff

> staring into space whilst waiting for customers to

> get ready to be served.

>

> Don't get me started on people who are on their

> phones at the counter; that's rude to the staff

> serving them and to the people waiting.

>

> The staff at Lordship Lane are good people doing

> their best. It's not their place to say "oh it's

> busy today I won't take a break". That's the thin

> end of the wedge. They have to eat and they have

> errands to run, just like everyone else.

Designerjooles Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Attention Razors: I was sending a box of

> chocolates and a card to my father in New Zealand

> for his birthday. Yeah - I'm so middle-class for

> doing that! The horror!

> Grow up and try to get that chip off your

> shoulder. Life is better when your happy.

. . . . . . . .

Sending a box of chocolates half way around the world-thats the type of thing that probably held up the original poster in queue-try reading and undestanding the OP b4 popping. Did the chocs melt i wonder. .

Loz Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Razors Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > What does everyone expect- LL PO is very busy

> with the middle classes sending all kinds of tat

> over

> > the world to their middle class pals, and it is

> they who clog up the PO.

>

> I wish you would PO...

. . . . . . . . . . .

Well if yot are happy to queue then don't complain about the staff,and put the OP right.

What GigGirl said.

If the middle classes are keeping the postal service going (and clogging up LL post office as a side effect) then hats off to them. I gave up on the Royal Mail years ago. All the chocs I send to New Zealand relatives originate from New Zealand chocolate shops. That's the beauty of the internet.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Actually I don't think so. What caused the problem was the ban on councils using the revenues from sales to build more houses. Had councils been able to reinvest in more housing then we would have had a boom in building. And councils would have been relieved, through the sales, of the cost of maintaining old housing stock. Thatcher believed that council tenants didn't vote Conservative, and home owners did. Which may have been, at the time a correct assumption. But it was the ban on councils building more from the sales revenues which was the real killer here. Not the sales themselves. 
    • I agree with Jenjenjen. Guarantees are provided for works and services actually carried out; they are not an insurance policy for leaks anywhere else on the roof. Assuming that the rendering at the chimney stopped the leak that you asked the roofer to repair, then the guarantee will cover that rendering work. Indeed, if at some time in the future it leaked again at that exact same spot but by another cause, that would not be covered. Failure of rendering around a chimney is pretty common so, if re-rendering did resolve that leak, there is no particular reason to link it to the holes in the felt elsewhere across the roof. 
    • Hey, I am on the first floor and I am directly impacted if roof leaks. We got a roofing company to do repair work which was supposed to be guaranteed. However, when it started leaking again, we were informed that the guarantee is just for a new roof and not repair work. Each time the company that did the repair work came out again over the next few years, we had to pay additional amounts. The roof continues to leak, so I have just organised another company to fix the roof instead, as the guarantee doesn't mean anything. 
    • Fernando came and sorted out our very overgrown garden.  He is a very friendly chap, works meticulously and charges very fair prices.   We’ve been using his Services for many years now and will continue to do so.    Here are his contact details if you have any gardening questions: Fernando - 07946 757938       
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...