Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Six of us enjoyed a Delicoius meal at Xoco Bar and Grill..

The food at this new addition to Lordship Lane is truely delightful and our Indian choices unlike anywhere else on the lane.


The service at Xoco is superb and the attention to detail is so good.

I personally would like to reccomend this new addition to all. Give this place a go.


Comlimentary Naan bread with Olives.. Hummus and Sun dried Tomatoes served pre meal..


My starter was The Falafel Onion Bhaji as pictured below..






Foxy

Delightful stone-based serving platters actually.


Food was indeed excellent. A contemporary take on the curry.


Its a shame more people don't try it. I think the menu doesn't help. Its a bit too eclectic and maybe gives the impression that there is too much going on for any of it to be excellent.


This is simply not the case.


So,give Xoco a chance, you will be rewarded.

Just to echo what Mike and Foxy have said ? the food here is really very good indeed. A significant step up from the usual Indo-Bangla fare (to which I'm partial, to be honest). Vibrant spices and flavours, great ingredients and very attentive service. Couldn't fault it.


But... and it's big 'but'. Their menu offering is currently very confusing (as is their name) and I fear many people won't give them a chance. They should ditch everything on the menu that isn't South Asian. And probably get rid of the big cokctail list too and soften the lighting a bit. Their food is more than good enough to shout from the rooftops that it's the best Indian fare on Lordship Lane.

DulwichFox Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Delightful stone-based serving platters actually.

>

> Well put Mr P.

>

> Take no notice of Jah Lush. He just cannot resist

> putting a negative slant on any positive post from

> The Fox.

>

> Tiresome attempt to highjack the thread.

>

> Foxy


I'm not trying highjack the thread. I certainly don't want to diss a new restaurant that I haven't tried yet either. I'm merely pointing out that eating anything off such a platter can't be healthy. Give me a proper plate any day.

Yep... get rid of the silly slates, get rid of the burgers, and concentrate on good contemporary south Asian.. lots of tasty grill/tandoor things and seafood options... get a couple of interesting beers in, maybe. Sounds like the basics are there, but needs a bit of refining to tune into what people really want.

red devil Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Mick Mac Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

>

> > Noone was interested in my name dropping. No

> > change there.

>

> We can't have that Mick. How much did Britain's

> richest man tip the waiter?...


To be honest. I didn't even know he was in there until someone told me this morning. Too busy troughing expensive popodoms and giant madagaskan prawns. I do remember a lot of waiters ushering someone through, but took no notice.



Thanks for your interest RD - much obliged.

DulwichFox Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Six of us enjoyed a Delicoius meal at Xoco Bar and

> Grill..

> The food at this new addition to Lordship Lane is

> truely delightful and our Indian choices unlike

> anywhere else on the lane.

>

> The service at Xoco is superb and the attention

> to detail is so good.

> I personally would like to reccomend this new

> addition to all. Give this place a go.

>

> Comlimentary Naan bread with Olives.. Hummus and

> Sun dried Tomatoes served pre meal..

>

> My starter was The Falafel Onion Bhaji as

> pictured below..

>

>

>

>

>

> Foxy


Three bhajis for a starter? Seems like a large portion or do you share?

DulwichFox Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Delightful stone-based serving platters actually.



Ha! Well you've certainly changed your tune.


DulwichFox Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------


> We get ?Pretentious? meals dished up on pieces of

> wood, chopping boards and slates, as well as

> drinks served in jam jars.

> ...and get charged a premium for the privilege..

>

> Just give us a nice white Porcelain plate...

>

> ... Yes ! there will be people on here that will

> say they like their food dished up on pieces of

> wood, chopping boards and slates, as well as

> drinks served in jam jars.

>

> .. Well I dont like it.. It's NOT cool.. It's

> Naff.

>

> Foxy

I really enjoyed my meal! The flavours of the spices and herbs were perfectly balanced and the presentaton was excellent. Only the starter came on a stone platter. The other courses were served on stylish plates. Service was attentive and the chef came out to check that everything was OK. Top notch!! Will be eating at Zoco again very soon. Do give them a try.

Sheila

Phlox Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Three bhajis for a starter? Seems like a large

> portion or do you share?


Too many onion bhajis is a nice problem to have as far as I'm concerned.


As for the slate... I think we can all agree it's a bit pass?, but if the food's OK, have a bit of a joke about it and move on...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Per Cllr McAsh, as quoted above: “We are currently updating our Enforcement Policy and changes will allow for the issuing of civil penalties ranging from £175 to £300 for visible smoke emissions, replacing the previous reliance on criminal prosecution. " Is anyone au fait with the Clean Air Act 1993, and  particularly with the state of 'Smoke Control' law and practice generally?  I've just been looking  through some of it for the first time and, afaics, the civil penalties mentioned  were introduced into the Clean Air Act, at Schedule 1A, in May 2022.  So it seems that, in this particular,  it's a matter of the enforcement policy trailing well behind the legislation.  I'm not criticising that at all, but am curious.  
    • Here's the part of march46's linked-to Southwark News article pertaining to Southwark Council. "Southwark Council were also contacted for a response. "Councillor James McAsh, Cabinet Member for Clean Air, Streets & Waste said: “One of Southwark’s key priorities is to create a healthy environment for our residents. “To achieve this we closely monitor legislation and measures that influence air pollution – our entire borough apart from inland waterways is designated as a Smoke Control Area, and we also offer substantial provision for electric vehicles to promote alternative fuel travel options and our Streets for People strategy. “We as a council support the work of Mums for Lungs and recognise the health and environmental impacts of domestic solid fuel burning, particularly from wood-burning appliances. “We are currently updating our Enforcement Policy and changes will allow for the issuing of civil penalties ranging from £175 to £300 for visible smoke emissions, replacing the previous reliance on criminal prosecution.  “This work is being undertaken in collaboration with other London boroughs as part of the pan-London Wood Burning Project, which aims to harmonise enforcement approaches and share best practice across the capital.” ETA: And here's a post I made a few years ago, with tangential relevance.  https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/278140-early-morning-drone-flying/?do=findComment&comment=1493274  
    • The solicitor is also the Executor. Big mistake, but my Aunt was very old, and this was the Covid years and shortly after so impossible to intervene and get a couple of close relatives to do this.  She had no children so this is the nephews and nieces. He is a single practitioner, and most at his age would have long since retired - there is a question over his competence Two letters have already gone essentially complaining - batted off and 'amusingly' one put the blame on us. There are five on our side, all speaking to each other, and ideally would work as a single point of contact.  But he has said that this is not allowed - we've all given approval to act on each others behalf. There are five on her late husband's side, who have not engaged with us despite the suggestion to work as a team, There is one other, who get's the lion's share, the typicical 'friend', but we are long since challenging the will. I would like to put another complaint together that he has not used modern collective communication (I expect that he is incapable) which had seriously delayed the execution of the will.   I know many in their 80s very adept with smart phones so that is not an ageist comment. The house has deteriorated very badly, with cold, damp and a serious leak.  PM me if you want to see the dreadful condition that it is now in. I would also question why if the five of us are happy to work together why all of us need to confirm in writing.             The house was lived in until Feb 23, and has been allowed to get like this.
    • Isn’t a five yearly electricity safety certificate one of the things the landlord must give for a legal tenancy?
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...