Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Looks like my Positive review of this new restaurant and indeed Michael p's have both been removed..


as for..


We get ?Pretentious? meals dished up on pieces of wood, chopping boards and slates, as well as

> drinks served in jam jars.

> ...and get charged a premium for the privilege..

>

> Just give us a nice white Porcelain plate...


Well the meal was not pretentious and we were not charged a premium for the privilege..and the main meal was on a porcelain plate..


DulwichFox


P.S. My photo was to highlight the food .. Not the slate.

Appologies for multiple edits but my browser is playing up and posts are not showing up properly.

DulwichFox Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------


>

> P.S. My deleted photo was to highlight the food ..

> Not the slate.



DulwichFox Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Delightful stone-based serving platters actually


Caught out but your denial will go on and on and on and on......

Jeremy Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Phlox Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > Three bhajis for a starter? Seems like a large

> > portion or do you share?

>

> Too many onion bhajis is a nice problem to have as

> far as I'm concerned.

>

> As for the slate... I think we can all agree it's

> a bit pass?, but if the food's OK, have a bit of a

> joke about it and move on...


Theye were not ordinary Onion Bhajis they were Falafel Onion barjis.. They are very delicate and light.

I am a very small eater and I managed to scoff the lot.. after my share of the Naans and Hummus.


DulwichFox

Mike - i respect your view a bit but given that a certain CC member, who acts with such self importance on this thread about any as he see's it 'non-members' comments/intrusions is on almost any other New Restaurant/ Bar thread with negativity, well, hmmmfff, it's the Lounge.

The problem for me is that this thread should be welcoming to new people who might wish to come along to Curry Club.


I do not want it to be hijacked to pursue gripes and vendettas that can be, and are, played out elsewhere.


The sniping of people, full of their own self importance communicates the impression of a clique and is off-putting. This is true of regulars and those of you who have never been to curry club.


That the thread is in The Lounge is a happy accident of history and demonstrates that this thread has been on the Forum longer than those that are posting.


Please squabble away elsewhere and show some respect to this venerable institution.

???? Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Mike - i respect your view a bit but given that a

> certain CC member, who acts with such self

> importance on this thread about any as he see's it

> 'non-members' comments/intrusions is on almost any

> other New Restaurant/ Bar thread with negativity,

> well, hmmmfff, it's the Lounge.


Making a comment on our previous CC night out is usual and most people do so when the night has been exceptional.

WTF has that got to do with self importance. ??

Sorry can't understand the above sentence ..


DulwichFox

DulwichFox Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Delightful stone-based serving platters actually.

>

> Well put Mr P.

>

> Take no notice of Jah Lush. He just cannot resist

> putting a negative slant on any positive post from

> The Fox.

>

> Tiresome attempt to highjack the thread.

>

> Foxy



This self importance from a man "the Fox" who jumps in with negativity on any new opening resturant thread


Sorry Mike, it's Friday and the lounge who wants to grow up anyway?

Michael Palaeologus Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------


> That the thread is in The Lounge is a happy

> accident of history and demonstrates that this

> thread has been on the Forum longer than those

> that are posting.


You've been FoxyFacted...


Curry Club thread started 02/01/08


Sue joined the EDF 04/12/06

Jeremy joined 01/02/07

Jah Lush joined 20/03/07

Alan Medic nee Narnia active in Aug '07

Red Devil joined 14/11/07

???? joined 01/12/07

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • In what way? Maybe it just felt more intelligent and considered coming directly after Question Time, which was a barely watchable bun fight.
    • Yes, all this. Totally Sephiroth. The electorate wants to see transformation overnight. That's not possible. But what is possible is leading with the right comms strategy, which isn't cutting through. As I've said before, messaging matters more now than policy, that's the only way to bring the electorate with you. And I worry that that's how Reform's going to get into power.  And the media LOVES Reform. 
    • “There was an excellent discussion on Newscast last night between the BBC Political Editor, the director of the IFS and the director of More In Common - all highly intelligent people with no party political agenda ” I would call this “generous”   Labour should never have made that tax promise because, as with - duh - Brexit, it’s pretending the real world doesn’t exist now. I blame Labour in no small part for this delusion. But the electorate need to cop on as well.  They think they can have everything they want without responsibilities, costs or attachments. The media encourage this  Labour do need to raise taxes. The country needs it.  Now, exactly how it’s done remains to be seen. But if people are just going to go around going “la la laffer curve. Liars! String em up! Vote someone else” then they just aren’t serious people reckoning with the problem yes Labour are more than a year into their term, but after 14 years of what the Tories  did? Whoever takes over, has a major problem 
    • Messaging, messaging, messaging. That's all it boils down to. There are only so many fiscal policies out there, and they're there for the taking, no matter which party you're in. I hate to say it, but Farage gets it right every time. Even when Reform reneges on fiscal policy, it does it with enough confidence and candidness that no one is wringing their hands. Instead, they're quietly admired for their pragmatism. Strangely, it's exactly the same as Labour has done, with its manifesto reverse on income tax, but it's going to bomb.  Blaming the Tories / Brexit / Covid / Putin ... none of it washes with the public anymore  - it wants to be sold a vision of the future, not reminded of the disasters of the past. Labour put itself on the back foot with its 'the tories fucked it all up' stance right at the beginning of its tenure.  All Lammy had to do (as with Reeves and Raynor etc) was say 'mea culpa. We've made a mistake, we'll fix it. Sorry guys, we're on it'. But instead it's 'nothing to see here / it's someone else's fault / I was buying a suit / hadn't been briefed yet'.  And, of course, the press smells blood, which never helps.  Oh! And Reeve's speech on Wednesday was so drab and predictable that even the journalists at the press conference couldn't really be arsed to come up with any challenging questions. 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...