Jump to content

Recommended Posts

So, where next?


We havent been to Omrith for 12 months. Omrith is next to the Forest Hill Tavern.


For the date I suggest Monday 21 March - this with the aim of cycling through the days of the week so that SOME people might be able to shoe horn us into their busy social diaries and so avoiding any outbreaks of flouncing in otherwise respectable wine-bars.

Glad the dust is settling with you lot and the hatchet is being buried (all be it in someone's head, but beggars can't be choosers!)


Also enough of those subtle comments Mr Palaeologus - otherwise a letter will be sent to your mother.


Omrith would be exciting given the previous experience there who knows what will happen!

I see now. If somebody replies to a post further up the thread then it has the subject title of that earlier post. On a thread such as this the subject title changes every month. Reply to a post from previous months and the post will appear at the end of the thread but with the earlier subject title.


Spooks12 replied to a post from over a year ago; but you already knew that

I went there on Saturday night for the first time since the redecoration. The lighting is thankfully dimmer than it was and the food is back up to scratch again. Don't worry children I shan't be joining you but you have your fun anyway. Bon appetite.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • It's called The Restorative Place. Also, the Fired Earth storefront is under offer too, apparently. How exciting...!
    • Perhaps the view is that there are fewer people needing social housing in London, going forward, or to cap it as it is rather than increasing it. We already see the demographic changing.
    • But actually, replacing council housing, or more accurately adding to housing stock and doing so via expanding council estates was precisely what we should have been doing, financed by selling off old housing stock. As the population grows adding to housing built by councils is surely the right thing to do, and financing it through sales is a good model, it's the one commercial house builders follow for instance. In the end the issue is about having the right volumes of the appropriate sort of housing to meet national needs. Thatcher stopped that by forbidding councils to use sales revenues to increase housing stock. That was the error. 
    • Had council stock not been sold off then it wouldn't have needed replacing. Whilst I agree that the prohibition on spending revenue from sales on new council housing was a contributory factor, where, in places where building land is scarce and expensive such as London, would these replacement homes have been built. Don't mention infill land! The whole right to buy issue made me so angry when it was introduced and I'm still fuming 40 odd years later. If I could see it was just creating problems for the future, how come Thatcher didn't. I suspect though she did, was more interested in buying votes, and just didn't care about a scarcity of housing impacting the next generations.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...